- This topic has 117 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 10 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2011 at 9:26 AM #667213February 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM #666082SD RealtorParticipant
I would agree with you UCG. One of the issues I see with downtown inventory is that (to me) there was heavy speculative purchases made. Couple that sort of buyer with severe carrying costs dictated by high HOA and you have a nice supply of foreclosures moving forward. You still dont come close to cash flowing with downtown condos when you factor in price/hoa/property taxes.
February 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM #666142SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with you UCG. One of the issues I see with downtown inventory is that (to me) there was heavy speculative purchases made. Couple that sort of buyer with severe carrying costs dictated by high HOA and you have a nice supply of foreclosures moving forward. You still dont come close to cash flowing with downtown condos when you factor in price/hoa/property taxes.
February 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM #666744SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with you UCG. One of the issues I see with downtown inventory is that (to me) there was heavy speculative purchases made. Couple that sort of buyer with severe carrying costs dictated by high HOA and you have a nice supply of foreclosures moving forward. You still dont come close to cash flowing with downtown condos when you factor in price/hoa/property taxes.
February 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM #666883SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with you UCG. One of the issues I see with downtown inventory is that (to me) there was heavy speculative purchases made. Couple that sort of buyer with severe carrying costs dictated by high HOA and you have a nice supply of foreclosures moving forward. You still dont come close to cash flowing with downtown condos when you factor in price/hoa/property taxes.
February 14, 2011 at 10:03 AM #667218SD RealtorParticipantI would agree with you UCG. One of the issues I see with downtown inventory is that (to me) there was heavy speculative purchases made. Couple that sort of buyer with severe carrying costs dictated by high HOA and you have a nice supply of foreclosures moving forward. You still dont come close to cash flowing with downtown condos when you factor in price/hoa/property taxes.
February 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM #666211barnaby33ParticipantDo mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.
February 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM #666270barnaby33ParticipantDo mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.
February 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM #666875barnaby33ParticipantDo mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.
February 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM #667013barnaby33ParticipantDo mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.
February 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM #667348barnaby33ParticipantDo mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.
February 19, 2011 at 8:02 AM #668322wild.t.a.Participant[quote=barnaby33]Do mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.[/quote]
I concur. I live in the marina district and would never buy in the area of where vantage is located.
February 19, 2011 at 8:02 AM #668384wild.t.a.Participant[quote=barnaby33]Do mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.[/quote]
I concur. I live in the marina district and would never buy in the area of where vantage is located.
February 19, 2011 at 8:02 AM #668991wild.t.a.Participant[quote=barnaby33]Do mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.[/quote]
I concur. I live in the marina district and would never buy in the area of where vantage is located.
February 19, 2011 at 8:02 AM #669130wild.t.a.Participant[quote=barnaby33]Do mean that Vantage point is solely, or even mostly responsible for a glut of units for sale? That doesn’t seem to be a realistic statement, because buyers there would seemingly be very different than buyers at BOSA or something more westerly.[/quote]
I concur. I live in the marina district and would never buy in the area of where vantage is located.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.