- This topic has 95 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by sjk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 18, 2008 at 3:14 PM #224955June 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM #2249704plexownerParticipant
“Under the new plan, downtown could absorb much of
the region’s growth, with a total of 75,000+ residents — one of the largest residential populations of any downtown in the United States. It will also accommodate substantial increase in employment, more than doubling downtown’s existing employment population, as well as substantial increases in civic and cultural amenities.”This is the kind of BS that CCDC used to fool San Diego taxpayers
June 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM #2249534plexownerParticipant“Under the new plan, downtown could absorb much of
the region’s growth, with a total of 75,000+ residents — one of the largest residential populations of any downtown in the United States. It will also accommodate substantial increase in employment, more than doubling downtown’s existing employment population, as well as substantial increases in civic and cultural amenities.”This is the kind of BS that CCDC used to fool San Diego taxpayers
June 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM #2248484plexownerParticipant“Under the new plan, downtown could absorb much of
the region’s growth, with a total of 75,000+ residents — one of the largest residential populations of any downtown in the United States. It will also accommodate substantial increase in employment, more than doubling downtown’s existing employment population, as well as substantial increases in civic and cultural amenities.”This is the kind of BS that CCDC used to fool San Diego taxpayers
June 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM #2250014plexownerParticipant“Under the new plan, downtown could absorb much of
the region’s growth, with a total of 75,000+ residents — one of the largest residential populations of any downtown in the United States. It will also accommodate substantial increase in employment, more than doubling downtown’s existing employment population, as well as substantial increases in civic and cultural amenities.”This is the kind of BS that CCDC used to fool San Diego taxpayers
June 18, 2008 at 3:30 PM #2250174plexownerParticipant“Under the new plan, downtown could absorb much of
the region’s growth, with a total of 75,000+ residents — one of the largest residential populations of any downtown in the United States. It will also accommodate substantial increase in employment, more than doubling downtown’s existing employment population, as well as substantial increases in civic and cultural amenities.”This is the kind of BS that CCDC used to fool San Diego taxpayers
June 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM #225594barnaby33ParticipantIts not that they lied, its just that the jobs created (waiters and bartenders) aren’t going to earn enough to live downtown in rentals, let alone buy.
JoshJune 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM #225612barnaby33ParticipantIts not that they lied, its just that the jobs created (waiters and bartenders) aren’t going to earn enough to live downtown in rentals, let alone buy.
JoshJune 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM #225567barnaby33ParticipantIts not that they lied, its just that the jobs created (waiters and bartenders) aren’t going to earn enough to live downtown in rentals, let alone buy.
JoshJune 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM #225549barnaby33ParticipantIts not that they lied, its just that the jobs created (waiters and bartenders) aren’t going to earn enough to live downtown in rentals, let alone buy.
JoshJune 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM #225439barnaby33ParticipantIts not that they lied, its just that the jobs created (waiters and bartenders) aren’t going to earn enough to live downtown in rentals, let alone buy.
JoshJune 20, 2008 at 9:09 AM #225768macmichaelParticipantWe moved to SD in 98 and thought we were ready for a condo. First year lived in Park Row downtown and then bought on Bankers Hill in Brittany Tower. After 5 years we sold and moved to Del Cerro for a SFR. This was well before the high rise condo explosion. Some points we found.
We always tended to go north to Hillcrest or Little Italy to eat; Gas Lamp was too expensive, and too tourist focused.
At the time Ralph’s was only store and it was way over priced. Had to drive too far to get to anything. Shortage of a wide variety of services.
Parking, storage, homeless people, HOA issues and a wide variety of similar issues and we said no more. Although Bankers Hill was alot better than downtown.
All the advertising shows the glamor and implies everything is so light and easy. I suppose if you have unlimited $$$ and live in best building and can hire everything out ( dog walking, cleaning, shopping, etc. ) it is okay, but think carefully about the reality of everyday life and how the HOA limits your rights. Been there, done that.
June 20, 2008 at 9:09 AM #225935macmichaelParticipantWe moved to SD in 98 and thought we were ready for a condo. First year lived in Park Row downtown and then bought on Bankers Hill in Brittany Tower. After 5 years we sold and moved to Del Cerro for a SFR. This was well before the high rise condo explosion. Some points we found.
We always tended to go north to Hillcrest or Little Italy to eat; Gas Lamp was too expensive, and too tourist focused.
At the time Ralph’s was only store and it was way over priced. Had to drive too far to get to anything. Shortage of a wide variety of services.
Parking, storage, homeless people, HOA issues and a wide variety of similar issues and we said no more. Although Bankers Hill was alot better than downtown.
All the advertising shows the glamor and implies everything is so light and easy. I suppose if you have unlimited $$$ and live in best building and can hire everything out ( dog walking, cleaning, shopping, etc. ) it is okay, but think carefully about the reality of everyday life and how the HOA limits your rights. Been there, done that.
June 20, 2008 at 9:09 AM #225875macmichaelParticipantWe moved to SD in 98 and thought we were ready for a condo. First year lived in Park Row downtown and then bought on Bankers Hill in Brittany Tower. After 5 years we sold and moved to Del Cerro for a SFR. This was well before the high rise condo explosion. Some points we found.
We always tended to go north to Hillcrest or Little Italy to eat; Gas Lamp was too expensive, and too tourist focused.
At the time Ralph’s was only store and it was way over priced. Had to drive too far to get to anything. Shortage of a wide variety of services.
Parking, storage, homeless people, HOA issues and a wide variety of similar issues and we said no more. Although Bankers Hill was alot better than downtown.
All the advertising shows the glamor and implies everything is so light and easy. I suppose if you have unlimited $$$ and live in best building and can hire everything out ( dog walking, cleaning, shopping, etc. ) it is okay, but think carefully about the reality of everyday life and how the HOA limits your rights. Been there, done that.
June 20, 2008 at 9:09 AM #225889macmichaelParticipantWe moved to SD in 98 and thought we were ready for a condo. First year lived in Park Row downtown and then bought on Bankers Hill in Brittany Tower. After 5 years we sold and moved to Del Cerro for a SFR. This was well before the high rise condo explosion. Some points we found.
We always tended to go north to Hillcrest or Little Italy to eat; Gas Lamp was too expensive, and too tourist focused.
At the time Ralph’s was only store and it was way over priced. Had to drive too far to get to anything. Shortage of a wide variety of services.
Parking, storage, homeless people, HOA issues and a wide variety of similar issues and we said no more. Although Bankers Hill was alot better than downtown.
All the advertising shows the glamor and implies everything is so light and easy. I suppose if you have unlimited $$$ and live in best building and can hire everything out ( dog walking, cleaning, shopping, etc. ) it is okay, but think carefully about the reality of everyday life and how the HOA limits your rights. Been there, done that.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.