Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Downtown 2/2 condo
- This topic has 16 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by PerryChase.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2007 at 4:02 PM #8891April 20, 2007 at 4:09 PM #50669Diego MamaniParticipant
Property tax and HOA alone could easily exceed $700 a month, and that’s before homeowner insurance. The mortgage pmt could be $2500 or so. That’s a lot of money to throw down the drain, especially on a depreciating asset. Perhaps you can rent a similar 2/2 unit for $2k a month and see if you really like the downtown condo lifestyle?
April 20, 2007 at 4:11 PM #50670CritterParticipantAre you familiar with Mr. Brightside? His blog tracks the downtown condo market. Here’s the link:
April 20, 2007 at 4:32 PM #50672PerryChaseParticipantHOA Downtown is $500/mo or more. Combine that with property taxes and you can easily hit $1200/month before even touching the interest and principal payment.
I think that once Downtown gets built-up, the lower end apartments (let’s call them what they are) will sell for about rental value, or below original builder prices.
There are so many rentals Downtown now that it’s stupid to buy. Unlike single family homes where school district and other features call for a premium, you can easily rent an apartment Downtown that is right next door to one that is for sale.
For example, you may not be able to rent a 3000sf SFR in a certain neighborhood with a certain school district. But you can rent an apartment in virtually any building Downtown.
April 20, 2007 at 4:59 PM #50673fsboParticipantif it went down to 1/02 price, around $250 ppsf for condo, the housing bubble would have been crashed.
how much is the HOA per month (and what does it cover)?April 20, 2007 at 5:38 PM #50676PerryChaseParticipantThis is an old condo with $393/mo HOA.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-076014470-1640_10th_Ave_107_San_Diego_CA_92101
I wouldn’t touch it with a 10 ft pole. I would not be surprised to see this or similarly old units drop to $200k or less. Rent and save your money.
——–
I’m exaggerating a bit here. Cortez Hill is a good area of Downtown (better than East Village, IMO) so compared to other properties at 1000sf, this one is not bad. But, realistically, you should wait another few years. I bet that you’ll be pleasantly surprised at what you could afford in a couple of years. Renting is the best option for now.
April 20, 2007 at 6:40 PM #50679no_such_realityParticipantI’m exaggerating a bit here.
I don’t think so. That’s a very dated interior. Like old apartments, they can’t command rent. Downtown is flooded with new decked out condos that will be competing desperately for renters.
April 20, 2007 at 6:54 PM #50680TemekuTParticipantWarning! Warning!
If this is a older wood-framed structure, you will hear the upstairs neighbors walking. You will even hear their bed creaking…and speaking of creaking, the older wood subfloor will definitely creak.
Buy in a concrete building for peace of mind. (but don’t buy yet)
April 20, 2007 at 9:40 PM #50687SD RealtorParticipantIf there is absolutely 1 place in the entire county that I would NOT buy into right now it would be downtown SD. I cannot urge you strong enough to hold off.
SD Realtor
April 20, 2007 at 11:18 PM #50696blahblahblahParticipantWhat will happen to the HOAs downtown as the FBs start walking away from their toxic voodoo loans? Are the banks obligated to pay the HOA or will the remaining homeowners have to pick up the tab?
April 20, 2007 at 11:48 PM #50698PerryChaseParticipantSD Realtor, there goes your Downtown sale. 😉
April 21, 2007 at 10:27 AM #50725PCinSDGuestWow, thanks for everyone’s input and the reality check. I currently rent in Bankers Hill for $845 a month. I think I’ll fix up my apartment and be content with that for the time being. Thanks again.
April 21, 2007 at 10:59 PM #50754SD RealtorParticipantDarn it Perry!! I would have gotten both sides as well… Anyways I did get the listing today. He did not price at my recommendation, I recommended 510 and he wanted 540. I got him to list at 525-565. Don’t ask me why he wanted the range. I think it is because he has the Prudential hangover. I was wrong, he bought at 600 not 620.
DNY – You were right it is Discovery, the general area is Cortez Hill.
SD Realtor
April 21, 2007 at 11:29 PM #50756sdrealtorParticipantYou’ll do fine with that price as any buyer will view it as 525K. Value range pricing is so 2004!
April 21, 2007 at 11:53 PM #50757anxvarietyParticipantYou’ll do fine with that price as any buyer will view it as 525K. Value range pricing is so 2004!
I saw some VRM priced places earlier in a flyer, and it was kinda funny how small the ranges were… I mean no gap I wouldn’t expect to shave off the bottom end of the price to begin with.
If you need to satisfy pride of ownership.. one such approach too consider, and one I’m taking is – buy a trailer, and a cheap desert acre for 10-20k.. That’s assuming you even like hanging out in the desert or have something to tow with.. at that point you have something you own, livable spot, weekend escape, and are buying in an area that in my opinion stands to appreciate in almost any conditions.. I see demand for desert land as ever increasing more than just more people on the planet.. see the Temecula experiment for the pattern that I think is most fitting.. even if it were to depreciate, it would be peanuts relative to an average salary or compared to a 20% drop on a 300-500k place..
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.