Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Does anyone have advice about whole life insurance?
- This topic has 116 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by ljinvestor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM #655990January 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM #654881RenParticipant
You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.
January 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM #654944RenParticipantYou people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.
January 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM #655541RenParticipantYou people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.
January 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM #655679RenParticipantYou people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.
January 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM #656010RenParticipantYou people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.
January 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM #654896CoronitaParticipant[quote=Ren]You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.[/quote]
Even with an gross income of $300k, it doesn’t really pan out as good shelter if your below the estate tax exemptions anyway, i think.
January 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM #654959CoronitaParticipant[quote=Ren]You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.[/quote]
Even with an gross income of $300k, it doesn’t really pan out as good shelter if your below the estate tax exemptions anyway, i think.
January 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM #655556CoronitaParticipant[quote=Ren]You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.[/quote]
Even with an gross income of $300k, it doesn’t really pan out as good shelter if your below the estate tax exemptions anyway, i think.
January 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM #655694CoronitaParticipant[quote=Ren]You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.[/quote]
Even with an gross income of $300k, it doesn’t really pan out as good shelter if your below the estate tax exemptions anyway, i think.
January 17, 2011 at 2:00 PM #656025CoronitaParticipant[quote=Ren]You people are too negative. Whole life is awesome for those who make $300k and can afford to throw money at bad investments.[/quote]
Even with an gross income of $300k, it doesn’t really pan out as good shelter if your below the estate tax exemptions anyway, i think.
January 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM #654931ltokudaParticipantMy brother and sister-in-law are both execs at a big insurance company. I asked them about this a few years ago and they said to buy 20 year term. Build up your savings over time so that you won’t need life insurance 20 years from now.
Insurance companies will often try to concentrate on certain markets (e.g. 35 years old, good health, 20 year term). So depending on your age, health, and product type, one company may offer better rates than another. For the “35 year old, good health, 20 year term” market, my brother recommended Banner, ING, West Coast Life, and Genworth.
January 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM #654994ltokudaParticipantMy brother and sister-in-law are both execs at a big insurance company. I asked them about this a few years ago and they said to buy 20 year term. Build up your savings over time so that you won’t need life insurance 20 years from now.
Insurance companies will often try to concentrate on certain markets (e.g. 35 years old, good health, 20 year term). So depending on your age, health, and product type, one company may offer better rates than another. For the “35 year old, good health, 20 year term” market, my brother recommended Banner, ING, West Coast Life, and Genworth.
January 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM #655591ltokudaParticipantMy brother and sister-in-law are both execs at a big insurance company. I asked them about this a few years ago and they said to buy 20 year term. Build up your savings over time so that you won’t need life insurance 20 years from now.
Insurance companies will often try to concentrate on certain markets (e.g. 35 years old, good health, 20 year term). So depending on your age, health, and product type, one company may offer better rates than another. For the “35 year old, good health, 20 year term” market, my brother recommended Banner, ING, West Coast Life, and Genworth.
January 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM #655730ltokudaParticipantMy brother and sister-in-law are both execs at a big insurance company. I asked them about this a few years ago and they said to buy 20 year term. Build up your savings over time so that you won’t need life insurance 20 years from now.
Insurance companies will often try to concentrate on certain markets (e.g. 35 years old, good health, 20 year term). So depending on your age, health, and product type, one company may offer better rates than another. For the “35 year old, good health, 20 year term” market, my brother recommended Banner, ING, West Coast Life, and Genworth.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.