- This topic has 95 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by 5yearwaiter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 30, 2008 at 10:51 AM #12603April 30, 2008 at 11:18 AM #196611gdcoxParticipant
Yeah, but it is not genuine wealth.
Real loss in wealth is what has hit bank shareholder whereby dividends per have have been slashed.
A landlord by contrast is still getting his rents, even if the price of the apartment has fallen by half.
A home owner is still getting the benefits of living in his house whether or not it rises or falls in value.
The only people really hit is the housing sector are those forced out because their debt service rises to affordable levels.
In the depression the income generation ability of business was damaged beyond belief. You can’t compare a house price adjustment with that.
April 30, 2008 at 11:18 AM #196645gdcoxParticipantYeah, but it is not genuine wealth.
Real loss in wealth is what has hit bank shareholder whereby dividends per have have been slashed.
A landlord by contrast is still getting his rents, even if the price of the apartment has fallen by half.
A home owner is still getting the benefits of living in his house whether or not it rises or falls in value.
The only people really hit is the housing sector are those forced out because their debt service rises to affordable levels.
In the depression the income generation ability of business was damaged beyond belief. You can’t compare a house price adjustment with that.
April 30, 2008 at 11:18 AM #196729gdcoxParticipantYeah, but it is not genuine wealth.
Real loss in wealth is what has hit bank shareholder whereby dividends per have have been slashed.
A landlord by contrast is still getting his rents, even if the price of the apartment has fallen by half.
A home owner is still getting the benefits of living in his house whether or not it rises or falls in value.
The only people really hit is the housing sector are those forced out because their debt service rises to affordable levels.
In the depression the income generation ability of business was damaged beyond belief. You can’t compare a house price adjustment with that.
April 30, 2008 at 11:18 AM #196690gdcoxParticipantYeah, but it is not genuine wealth.
Real loss in wealth is what has hit bank shareholder whereby dividends per have have been slashed.
A landlord by contrast is still getting his rents, even if the price of the apartment has fallen by half.
A home owner is still getting the benefits of living in his house whether or not it rises or falls in value.
The only people really hit is the housing sector are those forced out because their debt service rises to affordable levels.
In the depression the income generation ability of business was damaged beyond belief. You can’t compare a house price adjustment with that.
April 30, 2008 at 11:18 AM #196668gdcoxParticipantYeah, but it is not genuine wealth.
Real loss in wealth is what has hit bank shareholder whereby dividends per have have been slashed.
A landlord by contrast is still getting his rents, even if the price of the apartment has fallen by half.
A home owner is still getting the benefits of living in his house whether or not it rises or falls in value.
The only people really hit is the housing sector are those forced out because their debt service rises to affordable levels.
In the depression the income generation ability of business was damaged beyond belief. You can’t compare a house price adjustment with that.
April 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM #196739desmondParticipantPlease tell this to my mom whom I advised not to buy in 2005. She has not spoken to me since.
April 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM #196700desmondParticipantPlease tell this to my mom whom I advised not to buy in 2005. She has not spoken to me since.
April 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM #196678desmondParticipantPlease tell this to my mom whom I advised not to buy in 2005. She has not spoken to me since.
April 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM #196621desmondParticipantPlease tell this to my mom whom I advised not to buy in 2005. She has not spoken to me since.
April 30, 2008 at 11:43 AM #196654desmondParticipantPlease tell this to my mom whom I advised not to buy in 2005. She has not spoken to me since.
April 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM #196679Diego MamaniParticipantDesmond,
I pity your mom. I have a friend at work who bought in mid 2005 against my advice. He paid $900K and put 20% down. Now he wants to sell due to a job change, but he’s delusional. He has lowered his wishing price to $800K but even better houses than his are selling in the low $700s. So, the house now sits empty. With HOA, property tax, insurance, etc., his monthly expense is close to $5,000 (pre-tax).
He listed the house as a rental for $3500 but no one wants it. He has lowered his wishing rent to $3300, and I heard that another co-worker has offered him $3000.
Bitter owners, throwing money away on mortgage payments! This guy has lost more than his $180K down payment, and will probably lose more over the next 18-24 months. Of course, I never say “I told you so.”
April 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM #196764Diego MamaniParticipantDesmond,
I pity your mom. I have a friend at work who bought in mid 2005 against my advice. He paid $900K and put 20% down. Now he wants to sell due to a job change, but he’s delusional. He has lowered his wishing price to $800K but even better houses than his are selling in the low $700s. So, the house now sits empty. With HOA, property tax, insurance, etc., his monthly expense is close to $5,000 (pre-tax).
He listed the house as a rental for $3500 but no one wants it. He has lowered his wishing rent to $3300, and I heard that another co-worker has offered him $3000.
Bitter owners, throwing money away on mortgage payments! This guy has lost more than his $180K down payment, and will probably lose more over the next 18-24 months. Of course, I never say “I told you so.”
April 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM #196646Diego MamaniParticipantDesmond,
I pity your mom. I have a friend at work who bought in mid 2005 against my advice. He paid $900K and put 20% down. Now he wants to sell due to a job change, but he’s delusional. He has lowered his wishing price to $800K but even better houses than his are selling in the low $700s. So, the house now sits empty. With HOA, property tax, insurance, etc., his monthly expense is close to $5,000 (pre-tax).
He listed the house as a rental for $3500 but no one wants it. He has lowered his wishing rent to $3300, and I heard that another co-worker has offered him $3000.
Bitter owners, throwing money away on mortgage payments! This guy has lost more than his $180K down payment, and will probably lose more over the next 18-24 months. Of course, I never say “I told you so.”
April 30, 2008 at 12:02 PM #196725Diego MamaniParticipantDesmond,
I pity your mom. I have a friend at work who bought in mid 2005 against my advice. He paid $900K and put 20% down. Now he wants to sell due to a job change, but he’s delusional. He has lowered his wishing price to $800K but even better houses than his are selling in the low $700s. So, the house now sits empty. With HOA, property tax, insurance, etc., his monthly expense is close to $5,000 (pre-tax).
He listed the house as a rental for $3500 but no one wants it. He has lowered his wishing rent to $3300, and I heard that another co-worker has offered him $3000.
Bitter owners, throwing money away on mortgage payments! This guy has lost more than his $180K down payment, and will probably lose more over the next 18-24 months. Of course, I never say “I told you so.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.