- This topic has 450 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 27, 2008 at 2:48 PM #262783August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM #262489
Ex-SD
Participant[quote=renterclint]Ex-SD,
I think we have shown the above chainmail from your “VP at a very large bank” is MOSTLY inaccurate.Btw, I work in banking & let me tell you they give away “VP” titles pretty loosely. My department alone has 3. Sadly, I am not one yet…maybe next year? I was told the industry does this to make our clients feel important that they deal directly with an important vice president.[/quote]
Renterclint: You know NOT of what you speak. The guy who forwarded it to me is an Exec Vp and is not a flunky in a two-bit bank. He works in Atlanta in one of the largest banks. He may guilty of not thoroughly checking out all the links on the bottom of the email (just as I didn’t) but he is no lightweight in the financial world.
You may think that it’s OK to tax the shit out of people who have worked their way up to a large income (just like your buddies, Obama and Pelosi) but I don’t want any politicians putting their hands in my pocket (anymore than they already are) just because I have an income that they consider “too big so I need to share with the have nots of the world.”
Your bias for the Empty-suit, Obama has beamed through your posts. So, you just keep on worshiping at the liberal shrine and if you ever make any real money, you’ll see the light. Until then, you can hang out with your Johnny-NO-Money friends and drink wine while all of you bow to Hillary, Obama, Kennedy, etc etc and solve all of the world’s problems.
I, on the other hand have never gushed over McCain. I am a registered Libertarian and will vote for him solely in an attempt to keep another liberal, social program giveaway artist out of the White House. But you hang in there and maybe one day, they’ll give you a junior VP title at that little bank where you work.August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM #262691Participant[quote=renterclint]Ex-SD,
I think we have shown the above chainmail from your “VP at a very large bank” is MOSTLY inaccurate.Btw, I work in banking & let me tell you they give away “VP” titles pretty loosely. My department alone has 3. Sadly, I am not one yet…maybe next year? I was told the industry does this to make our clients feel important that they deal directly with an important vice president.[/quote]
Renterclint: You know NOT of what you speak. The guy who forwarded it to me is an Exec Vp and is not a flunky in a two-bit bank. He works in Atlanta in one of the largest banks. He may guilty of not thoroughly checking out all the links on the bottom of the email (just as I didn’t) but he is no lightweight in the financial world.
You may think that it’s OK to tax the shit out of people who have worked their way up to a large income (just like your buddies, Obama and Pelosi) but I don’t want any politicians putting their hands in my pocket (anymore than they already are) just because I have an income that they consider “too big so I need to share with the have nots of the world.”
Your bias for the Empty-suit, Obama has beamed through your posts. So, you just keep on worshiping at the liberal shrine and if you ever make any real money, you’ll see the light. Until then, you can hang out with your Johnny-NO-Money friends and drink wine while all of you bow to Hillary, Obama, Kennedy, etc etc and solve all of the world’s problems.
I, on the other hand have never gushed over McCain. I am a registered Libertarian and will vote for him solely in an attempt to keep another liberal, social program giveaway artist out of the White House. But you hang in there and maybe one day, they’ll give you a junior VP title at that little bank where you work.August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM #262699Participant[quote=renterclint]Ex-SD,
I think we have shown the above chainmail from your “VP at a very large bank” is MOSTLY inaccurate.Btw, I work in banking & let me tell you they give away “VP” titles pretty loosely. My department alone has 3. Sadly, I am not one yet…maybe next year? I was told the industry does this to make our clients feel important that they deal directly with an important vice president.[/quote]
Renterclint: You know NOT of what you speak. The guy who forwarded it to me is an Exec Vp and is not a flunky in a two-bit bank. He works in Atlanta in one of the largest banks. He may guilty of not thoroughly checking out all the links on the bottom of the email (just as I didn’t) but he is no lightweight in the financial world.
You may think that it’s OK to tax the shit out of people who have worked their way up to a large income (just like your buddies, Obama and Pelosi) but I don’t want any politicians putting their hands in my pocket (anymore than they already are) just because I have an income that they consider “too big so I need to share with the have nots of the world.”
Your bias for the Empty-suit, Obama has beamed through your posts. So, you just keep on worshiping at the liberal shrine and if you ever make any real money, you’ll see the light. Until then, you can hang out with your Johnny-NO-Money friends and drink wine while all of you bow to Hillary, Obama, Kennedy, etc etc and solve all of the world’s problems.
I, on the other hand have never gushed over McCain. I am a registered Libertarian and will vote for him solely in an attempt to keep another liberal, social program giveaway artist out of the White House. But you hang in there and maybe one day, they’ll give you a junior VP title at that little bank where you work.August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM #262750Participant[quote=renterclint]Ex-SD,
I think we have shown the above chainmail from your “VP at a very large bank” is MOSTLY inaccurate.Btw, I work in banking & let me tell you they give away “VP” titles pretty loosely. My department alone has 3. Sadly, I am not one yet…maybe next year? I was told the industry does this to make our clients feel important that they deal directly with an important vice president.[/quote]
Renterclint: You know NOT of what you speak. The guy who forwarded it to me is an Exec Vp and is not a flunky in a two-bit bank. He works in Atlanta in one of the largest banks. He may guilty of not thoroughly checking out all the links on the bottom of the email (just as I didn’t) but he is no lightweight in the financial world.
You may think that it’s OK to tax the shit out of people who have worked their way up to a large income (just like your buddies, Obama and Pelosi) but I don’t want any politicians putting their hands in my pocket (anymore than they already are) just because I have an income that they consider “too big so I need to share with the have nots of the world.”
Your bias for the Empty-suit, Obama has beamed through your posts. So, you just keep on worshiping at the liberal shrine and if you ever make any real money, you’ll see the light. Until then, you can hang out with your Johnny-NO-Money friends and drink wine while all of you bow to Hillary, Obama, Kennedy, etc etc and solve all of the world’s problems.
I, on the other hand have never gushed over McCain. I am a registered Libertarian and will vote for him solely in an attempt to keep another liberal, social program giveaway artist out of the White House. But you hang in there and maybe one day, they’ll give you a junior VP title at that little bank where you work.August 27, 2008 at 2:49 PM #262788Participant[quote=renterclint]Ex-SD,
I think we have shown the above chainmail from your “VP at a very large bank” is MOSTLY inaccurate.Btw, I work in banking & let me tell you they give away “VP” titles pretty loosely. My department alone has 3. Sadly, I am not one yet…maybe next year? I was told the industry does this to make our clients feel important that they deal directly with an important vice president.[/quote]
Renterclint: You know NOT of what you speak. The guy who forwarded it to me is an Exec Vp and is not a flunky in a two-bit bank. He works in Atlanta in one of the largest banks. He may guilty of not thoroughly checking out all the links on the bottom of the email (just as I didn’t) but he is no lightweight in the financial world.
You may think that it’s OK to tax the shit out of people who have worked their way up to a large income (just like your buddies, Obama and Pelosi) but I don’t want any politicians putting their hands in my pocket (anymore than they already are) just because I have an income that they consider “too big so I need to share with the have nots of the world.”
Your bias for the Empty-suit, Obama has beamed through your posts. So, you just keep on worshiping at the liberal shrine and if you ever make any real money, you’ll see the light. Until then, you can hang out with your Johnny-NO-Money friends and drink wine while all of you bow to Hillary, Obama, Kennedy, etc etc and solve all of the world’s problems.
I, on the other hand have never gushed over McCain. I am a registered Libertarian and will vote for him solely in an attempt to keep another liberal, social program giveaway artist out of the White House. But you hang in there and maybe one day, they’ll give you a junior VP title at that little bank where you work.August 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM #262497jficquette
ParticipantShe is a racist just like her husband.
How do I know?? Racists go to churchs for 20 years so they hear a Pastor talk about white devils.
People who are not racists walk out after about 5 mins of hearing crap like that.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM #262702ParticipantShe is a racist just like her husband.
How do I know?? Racists go to churchs for 20 years so they hear a Pastor talk about white devils.
People who are not racists walk out after about 5 mins of hearing crap like that.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM #262709ParticipantShe is a racist just like her husband.
How do I know?? Racists go to churchs for 20 years so they hear a Pastor talk about white devils.
People who are not racists walk out after about 5 mins of hearing crap like that.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM #262760ParticipantShe is a racist just like her husband.
How do I know?? Racists go to churchs for 20 years so they hear a Pastor talk about white devils.
People who are not racists walk out after about 5 mins of hearing crap like that.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM #262798ParticipantShe is a racist just like her husband.
How do I know?? Racists go to churchs for 20 years so they hear a Pastor talk about white devils.
People who are not racists walk out after about 5 mins of hearing crap like that.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:36 PM #262502Participant[quote=asianautica]SD Realtor, you and I are on the same track regarding this. That’s why I really hope this is the year a 3rd party will get a serious look. My vote will go to Bob Barr. Hopefully the Libertarian party will get enough vote to get public funding and a spot in the debate the next time around.[/quote]
Libertarian party will never be viable because too many people work for the government.
Libertarian party has been round for years. No one cares about supporting them.
Our system was designed to be grassroots system. All the power was put out in the local communities to elect their reps to congress. However, people think we are a top down system. They think we just elect a certain person as President and they will take care of everyting and get whatever they want done.
We think we can elect 535 Socialists to congress and expect the President to ride herd on the big mess and do it all by himself.
Right now Jesus Christ could be President and we would still be screwed because of our sorry congress.
We really need a grassroots movement to get the kind of ideals we want in the people we elect to congress. Once you get congress on your side then true reform can take place.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:36 PM #262706Participant[quote=asianautica]SD Realtor, you and I are on the same track regarding this. That’s why I really hope this is the year a 3rd party will get a serious look. My vote will go to Bob Barr. Hopefully the Libertarian party will get enough vote to get public funding and a spot in the debate the next time around.[/quote]
Libertarian party will never be viable because too many people work for the government.
Libertarian party has been round for years. No one cares about supporting them.
Our system was designed to be grassroots system. All the power was put out in the local communities to elect their reps to congress. However, people think we are a top down system. They think we just elect a certain person as President and they will take care of everyting and get whatever they want done.
We think we can elect 535 Socialists to congress and expect the President to ride herd on the big mess and do it all by himself.
Right now Jesus Christ could be President and we would still be screwed because of our sorry congress.
We really need a grassroots movement to get the kind of ideals we want in the people we elect to congress. Once you get congress on your side then true reform can take place.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:36 PM #262714Participant[quote=asianautica]SD Realtor, you and I are on the same track regarding this. That’s why I really hope this is the year a 3rd party will get a serious look. My vote will go to Bob Barr. Hopefully the Libertarian party will get enough vote to get public funding and a spot in the debate the next time around.[/quote]
Libertarian party will never be viable because too many people work for the government.
Libertarian party has been round for years. No one cares about supporting them.
Our system was designed to be grassroots system. All the power was put out in the local communities to elect their reps to congress. However, people think we are a top down system. They think we just elect a certain person as President and they will take care of everyting and get whatever they want done.
We think we can elect 535 Socialists to congress and expect the President to ride herd on the big mess and do it all by himself.
Right now Jesus Christ could be President and we would still be screwed because of our sorry congress.
We really need a grassroots movement to get the kind of ideals we want in the people we elect to congress. Once you get congress on your side then true reform can take place.
John
August 27, 2008 at 3:36 PM #262765Participant[quote=asianautica]SD Realtor, you and I are on the same track regarding this. That’s why I really hope this is the year a 3rd party will get a serious look. My vote will go to Bob Barr. Hopefully the Libertarian party will get enough vote to get public funding and a spot in the debate the next time around.[/quote]
Libertarian party will never be viable because too many people work for the government.
Libertarian party has been round for years. No one cares about supporting them.
Our system was designed to be grassroots system. All the power was put out in the local communities to elect their reps to congress. However, people think we are a top down system. They think we just elect a certain person as President and they will take care of everyting and get whatever they want done.
We think we can elect 535 Socialists to congress and expect the President to ride herd on the big mess and do it all by himself.
Right now Jesus Christ could be President and we would still be screwed because of our sorry congress.
We really need a grassroots movement to get the kind of ideals we want in the people we elect to congress. Once you get congress on your side then true reform can take place.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.