- This topic has 175 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 21, 2008 at 9:49 PM #140665January 21, 2008 at 10:02 PM #140381AnonymousGuest
You’re interesting. Your wife’s a lucky woman-IF you’re easy on the eyes. Is she Catholic as well? Curious.
January 21, 2008 at 10:02 PM #140600AnonymousGuestYou’re interesting. Your wife’s a lucky woman-IF you’re easy on the eyes. Is she Catholic as well? Curious.
January 21, 2008 at 10:02 PM #140622AnonymousGuestYou’re interesting. Your wife’s a lucky woman-IF you’re easy on the eyes. Is she Catholic as well? Curious.
January 21, 2008 at 10:02 PM #140643AnonymousGuestYou’re interesting. Your wife’s a lucky woman-IF you’re easy on the eyes. Is she Catholic as well? Curious.
January 21, 2008 at 10:02 PM #140694AnonymousGuestYou’re interesting. Your wife’s a lucky woman-IF you’re easy on the eyes. Is she Catholic as well? Curious.
January 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM #140376AnonymousGuestIt’s complicated Allen. Not hypocrisy, but rather two opposing forces working. I would only be interesting in deflowering BIG alter boys. Not little. Do you think I’m a pedophile, Allan dearest?
Would you like me to stop calling you, dearest? Or do you secretly enjoy it?
Finish it.
correction: well, not really deflowering them.
January 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM #140594AnonymousGuestIt’s complicated Allen. Not hypocrisy, but rather two opposing forces working. I would only be interesting in deflowering BIG alter boys. Not little. Do you think I’m a pedophile, Allan dearest?
Would you like me to stop calling you, dearest? Or do you secretly enjoy it?
Finish it.
correction: well, not really deflowering them.
January 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM #140616AnonymousGuestIt’s complicated Allen. Not hypocrisy, but rather two opposing forces working. I would only be interesting in deflowering BIG alter boys. Not little. Do you think I’m a pedophile, Allan dearest?
Would you like me to stop calling you, dearest? Or do you secretly enjoy it?
Finish it.
correction: well, not really deflowering them.
January 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM #140638AnonymousGuestIt’s complicated Allen. Not hypocrisy, but rather two opposing forces working. I would only be interesting in deflowering BIG alter boys. Not little. Do you think I’m a pedophile, Allan dearest?
Would you like me to stop calling you, dearest? Or do you secretly enjoy it?
Finish it.
correction: well, not really deflowering them.
January 21, 2008 at 10:13 PM #140689AnonymousGuestIt’s complicated Allen. Not hypocrisy, but rather two opposing forces working. I would only be interesting in deflowering BIG alter boys. Not little. Do you think I’m a pedophile, Allan dearest?
Would you like me to stop calling you, dearest? Or do you secretly enjoy it?
Finish it.
correction: well, not really deflowering them.
January 21, 2008 at 10:16 PM #140396Allan from FallbrookParticipantSo, it is not hypocrisy, but two opposing forces working? That requires explanation. In your words, you need to finish that particular thought. The truncated version you just tossed out there doesn’t get it, and leaves more unanswered than answered. In other words, a dodge.
I don’t think you’re a pedophile. At least, I hope you’re not. What is the fascination with altar boys (regardless of size)? Is it that corruption of the innocent (which smacks somewhat of a rather predatory approach) you voiced earlier, or is there something else lurking there?
My wife is a converted Presbie. She converted to Catholicism (of her own accord, I certainly did not push in that direction).
I get the sense that the “dearest” is a nose tweak. I could be wrong, of course.
January 21, 2008 at 10:16 PM #140614Allan from FallbrookParticipantSo, it is not hypocrisy, but two opposing forces working? That requires explanation. In your words, you need to finish that particular thought. The truncated version you just tossed out there doesn’t get it, and leaves more unanswered than answered. In other words, a dodge.
I don’t think you’re a pedophile. At least, I hope you’re not. What is the fascination with altar boys (regardless of size)? Is it that corruption of the innocent (which smacks somewhat of a rather predatory approach) you voiced earlier, or is there something else lurking there?
My wife is a converted Presbie. She converted to Catholicism (of her own accord, I certainly did not push in that direction).
I get the sense that the “dearest” is a nose tweak. I could be wrong, of course.
January 21, 2008 at 10:16 PM #140634Allan from FallbrookParticipantSo, it is not hypocrisy, but two opposing forces working? That requires explanation. In your words, you need to finish that particular thought. The truncated version you just tossed out there doesn’t get it, and leaves more unanswered than answered. In other words, a dodge.
I don’t think you’re a pedophile. At least, I hope you’re not. What is the fascination with altar boys (regardless of size)? Is it that corruption of the innocent (which smacks somewhat of a rather predatory approach) you voiced earlier, or is there something else lurking there?
My wife is a converted Presbie. She converted to Catholicism (of her own accord, I certainly did not push in that direction).
I get the sense that the “dearest” is a nose tweak. I could be wrong, of course.
January 21, 2008 at 10:16 PM #140659Allan from FallbrookParticipantSo, it is not hypocrisy, but two opposing forces working? That requires explanation. In your words, you need to finish that particular thought. The truncated version you just tossed out there doesn’t get it, and leaves more unanswered than answered. In other words, a dodge.
I don’t think you’re a pedophile. At least, I hope you’re not. What is the fascination with altar boys (regardless of size)? Is it that corruption of the innocent (which smacks somewhat of a rather predatory approach) you voiced earlier, or is there something else lurking there?
My wife is a converted Presbie. She converted to Catholicism (of her own accord, I certainly did not push in that direction).
I get the sense that the “dearest” is a nose tweak. I could be wrong, of course.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.