- This topic has 90 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by LAAFTERHOURS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 16, 2008 at 11:56 AM #13317July 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM #240588PadreBrianParticipant
It’s just a resection. The unemployment is too low. But, if there are more layoffs/out-sourcing or there’s a banking collapse, we’ll be there. BUT, I don’t see that happening. Dubya is doing everything he can to correct his blunders…he doesn’t want to take the title as “worst president ever” from Hoover.
July 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM #240390PadreBrianParticipantIt’s just a resection. The unemployment is too low. But, if there are more layoffs/out-sourcing or there’s a banking collapse, we’ll be there. BUT, I don’t see that happening. Dubya is doing everything he can to correct his blunders…he doesn’t want to take the title as “worst president ever” from Hoover.
July 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM #240595PadreBrianParticipantIt’s just a resection. The unemployment is too low. But, if there are more layoffs/out-sourcing or there’s a banking collapse, we’ll be there. BUT, I don’t see that happening. Dubya is doing everything he can to correct his blunders…he doesn’t want to take the title as “worst president ever” from Hoover.
July 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM #240535PadreBrianParticipantIt’s just a resection. The unemployment is too low. But, if there are more layoffs/out-sourcing or there’s a banking collapse, we’ll be there. BUT, I don’t see that happening. Dubya is doing everything he can to correct his blunders…he doesn’t want to take the title as “worst president ever” from Hoover.
July 16, 2008 at 12:56 PM #240528PadreBrianParticipantIt’s just a resection. The unemployment is too low. But, if there are more layoffs/out-sourcing or there’s a banking collapse, we’ll be there. BUT, I don’t see that happening. Dubya is doing everything he can to correct his blunders…he doesn’t want to take the title as “worst president ever” from Hoover.
July 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM #240583crParticipantInteresting read, except I am unfortunately not as optimistic because looking at what pulled America out the Great Depression I don’t see such opportunity this time around. We’re already at war, already predominantly dual house-hold incomes, and greatly reducing manufacturing jobs.
Apparently I’m not as optimistic as Wall Street either seeing as the Dow is up about 2% today despite a 1.1% jump in consumer prices for June alone, but that’s basically the article’s point.
Then again a close look at the Dow from 1928 to 1938 by no means gives reason to think today’s jump means the bottom is behind us.
[img_assist|nid=8275|title=Dow ’28-38|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=55]
July 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM #240590crParticipantInteresting read, except I am unfortunately not as optimistic because looking at what pulled America out the Great Depression I don’t see such opportunity this time around. We’re already at war, already predominantly dual house-hold incomes, and greatly reducing manufacturing jobs.
Apparently I’m not as optimistic as Wall Street either seeing as the Dow is up about 2% today despite a 1.1% jump in consumer prices for June alone, but that’s basically the article’s point.
Then again a close look at the Dow from 1928 to 1938 by no means gives reason to think today’s jump means the bottom is behind us.
[img_assist|nid=8275|title=Dow ’28-38|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=55]
July 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM #240529crParticipantInteresting read, except I am unfortunately not as optimistic because looking at what pulled America out the Great Depression I don’t see such opportunity this time around. We’re already at war, already predominantly dual house-hold incomes, and greatly reducing manufacturing jobs.
Apparently I’m not as optimistic as Wall Street either seeing as the Dow is up about 2% today despite a 1.1% jump in consumer prices for June alone, but that’s basically the article’s point.
Then again a close look at the Dow from 1928 to 1938 by no means gives reason to think today’s jump means the bottom is behind us.
[img_assist|nid=8275|title=Dow ’28-38|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=55]
July 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM #240523crParticipantInteresting read, except I am unfortunately not as optimistic because looking at what pulled America out the Great Depression I don’t see such opportunity this time around. We’re already at war, already predominantly dual house-hold incomes, and greatly reducing manufacturing jobs.
Apparently I’m not as optimistic as Wall Street either seeing as the Dow is up about 2% today despite a 1.1% jump in consumer prices for June alone, but that’s basically the article’s point.
Then again a close look at the Dow from 1928 to 1938 by no means gives reason to think today’s jump means the bottom is behind us.
[img_assist|nid=8275|title=Dow ’28-38|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=55]
July 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM #240384crParticipantInteresting read, except I am unfortunately not as optimistic because looking at what pulled America out the Great Depression I don’t see such opportunity this time around. We’re already at war, already predominantly dual house-hold incomes, and greatly reducing manufacturing jobs.
Apparently I’m not as optimistic as Wall Street either seeing as the Dow is up about 2% today despite a 1.1% jump in consumer prices for June alone, but that’s basically the article’s point.
Then again a close look at the Dow from 1928 to 1938 by no means gives reason to think today’s jump means the bottom is behind us.
[img_assist|nid=8275|title=Dow ’28-38|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=55]
July 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM #240603peterbParticipantWWII brought about full employment based on huge govt spending. By the end of WWII the USA had a debt greater than 50% of it’s GDP. Historically speaking, we could go there again. The Fed is trying every trick in the book to get money moving, but it aint working….so if they cant get the private sector to spend, then they’ll have to start spending themselves. Which is essentially what brought us out of the Great Depression. It makes sense, when things get really bad, the only people who will spend money are those that dont have to earn it.
July 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM #240400peterbParticipantWWII brought about full employment based on huge govt spending. By the end of WWII the USA had a debt greater than 50% of it’s GDP. Historically speaking, we could go there again. The Fed is trying every trick in the book to get money moving, but it aint working….so if they cant get the private sector to spend, then they’ll have to start spending themselves. Which is essentially what brought us out of the Great Depression. It makes sense, when things get really bad, the only people who will spend money are those that dont have to earn it.
July 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM #240600peterbParticipantWWII brought about full employment based on huge govt spending. By the end of WWII the USA had a debt greater than 50% of it’s GDP. Historically speaking, we could go there again. The Fed is trying every trick in the book to get money moving, but it aint working….so if they cant get the private sector to spend, then they’ll have to start spending themselves. Which is essentially what brought us out of the Great Depression. It makes sense, when things get really bad, the only people who will spend money are those that dont have to earn it.
July 16, 2008 at 1:11 PM #240538peterbParticipantWWII brought about full employment based on huge govt spending. By the end of WWII the USA had a debt greater than 50% of it’s GDP. Historically speaking, we could go there again. The Fed is trying every trick in the book to get money moving, but it aint working….so if they cant get the private sector to spend, then they’ll have to start spending themselves. Which is essentially what brought us out of the Great Depression. It makes sense, when things get really bad, the only people who will spend money are those that dont have to earn it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.