- This topic has 605 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 20, 2010 at 3:29 PM #504770January 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM #503897partypupParticipant
[quote=pri_dk]
We live in the most prosperous time in the most prosperous place that has ever existed. Anyone that can read this message board has more freedom and opportunity than 99% of all the people whom have ever lived in history. [/quote]
I just want everyone on this board to consider the drivel coming from this person’s mouth before responding to their posts in the future. It’s like arguing with a log or a lawn chair.
January 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM #504039partypupParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
We live in the most prosperous time in the most prosperous place that has ever existed. Anyone that can read this message board has more freedom and opportunity than 99% of all the people whom have ever lived in history. [/quote]
I just want everyone on this board to consider the drivel coming from this person’s mouth before responding to their posts in the future. It’s like arguing with a log or a lawn chair.
January 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM #504439partypupParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
We live in the most prosperous time in the most prosperous place that has ever existed. Anyone that can read this message board has more freedom and opportunity than 99% of all the people whom have ever lived in history. [/quote]
I just want everyone on this board to consider the drivel coming from this person’s mouth before responding to their posts in the future. It’s like arguing with a log or a lawn chair.
January 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM #504530partypupParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
We live in the most prosperous time in the most prosperous place that has ever existed. Anyone that can read this message board has more freedom and opportunity than 99% of all the people whom have ever lived in history. [/quote]
I just want everyone on this board to consider the drivel coming from this person’s mouth before responding to their posts in the future. It’s like arguing with a log or a lawn chair.
January 20, 2010 at 3:35 PM #504780partypupParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
We live in the most prosperous time in the most prosperous place that has ever existed. Anyone that can read this message board has more freedom and opportunity than 99% of all the people whom have ever lived in history. [/quote]
I just want everyone on this board to consider the drivel coming from this person’s mouth before responding to their posts in the future. It’s like arguing with a log or a lawn chair.
January 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM #503902Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s why I’d much rather be a social progressive than a conservative. Let’s try new ways of thinking and living.I believe that conservatives are static in thinking. How far back in time do they want to conserve?
When I think of the Republican masses, I picture people in Mississippi with no teeth and no health-care voting for conservatives such as Haley Barbour.[/quote]
Brian: Well, I didn’t want to do this, but I think its time to discuss GSF (Gadarene Swine Fallacy) with you. Similar to the “echo chamber” or “Groupthink”, GSF asks one simple, yet very important question: Just because you’re in the right formation, does that mean you’re going in the right direction? http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/The%20Gadarene%20Swine%20Fallacy.htm
When you’re done digesting that, pick up a copy of Isaiah Berlin’s “Essays on Liberty”. It’ll teach some valuable, and needed, lessons on what it means to be an American and why tired post-structuralist memes, metaphors and aphorisms crouching under the moniker of “social progressivism” are so much bullshit. The Left can dress up statist nonsense circa 1968 (or circa 1848, for that matter) all they want, but its the same old, same old.
The Democrats haven’t had a solid ideological underpinning since the early 1960s and the most vibrant and vital ideas have come from conservatives. The last successful Democratic President, Clinton, got that way by stealing all the good shit from conservatives (triangulation, anyone?) and claiming it for his own.
New ways of thinking, indeed. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
January 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM #504044Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s why I’d much rather be a social progressive than a conservative. Let’s try new ways of thinking and living.I believe that conservatives are static in thinking. How far back in time do they want to conserve?
When I think of the Republican masses, I picture people in Mississippi with no teeth and no health-care voting for conservatives such as Haley Barbour.[/quote]
Brian: Well, I didn’t want to do this, but I think its time to discuss GSF (Gadarene Swine Fallacy) with you. Similar to the “echo chamber” or “Groupthink”, GSF asks one simple, yet very important question: Just because you’re in the right formation, does that mean you’re going in the right direction? http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/The%20Gadarene%20Swine%20Fallacy.htm
When you’re done digesting that, pick up a copy of Isaiah Berlin’s “Essays on Liberty”. It’ll teach some valuable, and needed, lessons on what it means to be an American and why tired post-structuralist memes, metaphors and aphorisms crouching under the moniker of “social progressivism” are so much bullshit. The Left can dress up statist nonsense circa 1968 (or circa 1848, for that matter) all they want, but its the same old, same old.
The Democrats haven’t had a solid ideological underpinning since the early 1960s and the most vibrant and vital ideas have come from conservatives. The last successful Democratic President, Clinton, got that way by stealing all the good shit from conservatives (triangulation, anyone?) and claiming it for his own.
New ways of thinking, indeed. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
January 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM #504444Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s why I’d much rather be a social progressive than a conservative. Let’s try new ways of thinking and living.I believe that conservatives are static in thinking. How far back in time do they want to conserve?
When I think of the Republican masses, I picture people in Mississippi with no teeth and no health-care voting for conservatives such as Haley Barbour.[/quote]
Brian: Well, I didn’t want to do this, but I think its time to discuss GSF (Gadarene Swine Fallacy) with you. Similar to the “echo chamber” or “Groupthink”, GSF asks one simple, yet very important question: Just because you’re in the right formation, does that mean you’re going in the right direction? http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/The%20Gadarene%20Swine%20Fallacy.htm
When you’re done digesting that, pick up a copy of Isaiah Berlin’s “Essays on Liberty”. It’ll teach some valuable, and needed, lessons on what it means to be an American and why tired post-structuralist memes, metaphors and aphorisms crouching under the moniker of “social progressivism” are so much bullshit. The Left can dress up statist nonsense circa 1968 (or circa 1848, for that matter) all they want, but its the same old, same old.
The Democrats haven’t had a solid ideological underpinning since the early 1960s and the most vibrant and vital ideas have come from conservatives. The last successful Democratic President, Clinton, got that way by stealing all the good shit from conservatives (triangulation, anyone?) and claiming it for his own.
New ways of thinking, indeed. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
January 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM #504535Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s why I’d much rather be a social progressive than a conservative. Let’s try new ways of thinking and living.I believe that conservatives are static in thinking. How far back in time do they want to conserve?
When I think of the Republican masses, I picture people in Mississippi with no teeth and no health-care voting for conservatives such as Haley Barbour.[/quote]
Brian: Well, I didn’t want to do this, but I think its time to discuss GSF (Gadarene Swine Fallacy) with you. Similar to the “echo chamber” or “Groupthink”, GSF asks one simple, yet very important question: Just because you’re in the right formation, does that mean you’re going in the right direction? http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/The%20Gadarene%20Swine%20Fallacy.htm
When you’re done digesting that, pick up a copy of Isaiah Berlin’s “Essays on Liberty”. It’ll teach some valuable, and needed, lessons on what it means to be an American and why tired post-structuralist memes, metaphors and aphorisms crouching under the moniker of “social progressivism” are so much bullshit. The Left can dress up statist nonsense circa 1968 (or circa 1848, for that matter) all they want, but its the same old, same old.
The Democrats haven’t had a solid ideological underpinning since the early 1960s and the most vibrant and vital ideas have come from conservatives. The last successful Democratic President, Clinton, got that way by stealing all the good shit from conservatives (triangulation, anyone?) and claiming it for his own.
New ways of thinking, indeed. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
January 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM #504785Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s why I’d much rather be a social progressive than a conservative. Let’s try new ways of thinking and living.I believe that conservatives are static in thinking. How far back in time do they want to conserve?
When I think of the Republican masses, I picture people in Mississippi with no teeth and no health-care voting for conservatives such as Haley Barbour.[/quote]
Brian: Well, I didn’t want to do this, but I think its time to discuss GSF (Gadarene Swine Fallacy) with you. Similar to the “echo chamber” or “Groupthink”, GSF asks one simple, yet very important question: Just because you’re in the right formation, does that mean you’re going in the right direction? http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Archives/The%20Gadarene%20Swine%20Fallacy.htm
When you’re done digesting that, pick up a copy of Isaiah Berlin’s “Essays on Liberty”. It’ll teach some valuable, and needed, lessons on what it means to be an American and why tired post-structuralist memes, metaphors and aphorisms crouching under the moniker of “social progressivism” are so much bullshit. The Left can dress up statist nonsense circa 1968 (or circa 1848, for that matter) all they want, but its the same old, same old.
The Democrats haven’t had a solid ideological underpinning since the early 1960s and the most vibrant and vital ideas have come from conservatives. The last successful Democratic President, Clinton, got that way by stealing all the good shit from conservatives (triangulation, anyone?) and claiming it for his own.
New ways of thinking, indeed. “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”.
January 20, 2010 at 3:50 PM #503907briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
We don’t need to take it back.We already have it. We’ve had it since 1776.
Sure some have more than others — and some have a lot more than others. But collectively, we still have our country. [/quote]
You put it well. π
By all measures the American people are better off than they have ever been. We certainly don’t want to go back in time in a conservative sort of way.
As a whole, progressive forces have always moved us forward whereas conservative elements want to hold us back.
January 20, 2010 at 3:50 PM #504048briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
We don’t need to take it back.We already have it. We’ve had it since 1776.
Sure some have more than others — and some have a lot more than others. But collectively, we still have our country. [/quote]
You put it well. π
By all measures the American people are better off than they have ever been. We certainly don’t want to go back in time in a conservative sort of way.
As a whole, progressive forces have always moved us forward whereas conservative elements want to hold us back.
January 20, 2010 at 3:50 PM #504449briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
We don’t need to take it back.We already have it. We’ve had it since 1776.
Sure some have more than others — and some have a lot more than others. But collectively, we still have our country. [/quote]
You put it well. π
By all measures the American people are better off than they have ever been. We certainly don’t want to go back in time in a conservative sort of way.
As a whole, progressive forces have always moved us forward whereas conservative elements want to hold us back.
January 20, 2010 at 3:50 PM #504539briansd1Guest[quote=pri_dk]
We don’t need to take it back.We already have it. We’ve had it since 1776.
Sure some have more than others — and some have a lot more than others. But collectively, we still have our country. [/quote]
You put it well. π
By all measures the American people are better off than they have ever been. We certainly don’t want to go back in time in a conservative sort of way.
As a whole, progressive forces have always moved us forward whereas conservative elements want to hold us back.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.