- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by AK.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 30, 2009 at 9:59 PM #14947January 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM #3392224plexownerParticipant
lease-to-own is one way to try and recover from a bad RE investment
statistically, only 20% or so of lease-to-owns are ever purchased by the renter
landlord gets a premium rent and a tenant that takes care of the property and then gets to keep to property to boot
it doesn’t get much better than that!
January 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM #3395494plexownerParticipantlease-to-own is one way to try and recover from a bad RE investment
statistically, only 20% or so of lease-to-owns are ever purchased by the renter
landlord gets a premium rent and a tenant that takes care of the property and then gets to keep to property to boot
it doesn’t get much better than that!
January 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM #3396434plexownerParticipantlease-to-own is one way to try and recover from a bad RE investment
statistically, only 20% or so of lease-to-owns are ever purchased by the renter
landlord gets a premium rent and a tenant that takes care of the property and then gets to keep to property to boot
it doesn’t get much better than that!
January 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM #3396714plexownerParticipantlease-to-own is one way to try and recover from a bad RE investment
statistically, only 20% or so of lease-to-owns are ever purchased by the renter
landlord gets a premium rent and a tenant that takes care of the property and then gets to keep to property to boot
it doesn’t get much better than that!
January 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM #3397654plexownerParticipantlease-to-own is one way to try and recover from a bad RE investment
statistically, only 20% or so of lease-to-owns are ever purchased by the renter
landlord gets a premium rent and a tenant that takes care of the property and then gets to keep to property to boot
it doesn’t get much better than that!
January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM #339512AKParticipantI’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.
January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM #339838AKParticipantI’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.
January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM #339934AKParticipantI’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.
January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM #339961AKParticipantI’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.
January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM #340055AKParticipantI’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.
February 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM #340149Blissful IgnoramusParticipantAccording to Zillow, it last sold in Sep 2003 for 327K.
Maybe they’re thinking that if someone comes in at 100K under the asking price, they won’t take a bath.
Anyway, you know things are pretty bad when people who bought 5+ years ago are looking at a good 20% price decline.
February 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM #340270Blissful IgnoramusParticipantAccording to Zillow, it last sold in Sep 2003 for 327K.
Maybe they’re thinking that if someone comes in at 100K under the asking price, they won’t take a bath.
Anyway, you know things are pretty bad when people who bought 5+ years ago are looking at a good 20% price decline.
February 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM #340176Blissful IgnoramusParticipantAccording to Zillow, it last sold in Sep 2003 for 327K.
Maybe they’re thinking that if someone comes in at 100K under the asking price, they won’t take a bath.
Anyway, you know things are pretty bad when people who bought 5+ years ago are looking at a good 20% price decline.
February 1, 2009 at 7:37 PM #340053Blissful IgnoramusParticipantAccording to Zillow, it last sold in Sep 2003 for 327K.
Maybe they’re thinking that if someone comes in at 100K under the asking price, they won’t take a bath.
Anyway, you know things are pretty bad when people who bought 5+ years ago are looking at a good 20% price decline.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.