Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Del Cerro View Homes
- This topic has 1,005 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by poway_seller.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #212300May 28, 2008 at 2:46 AM #212386AnonymousGuest
KamFongasChinHO, so what is your conclusion on the 6486
Dwane closure, who was the clear winner or loser in the deal the buyer or the seller and what are your reasons??? and with a price of $258 per square foot , is that a good benchmark for buying properties in Del Cerro ? or should we see lower prices per sq foot ? much appreciated,Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 2:46 AM #212462AnonymousGuestKamFongasChinHO, so what is your conclusion on the 6486
Dwane closure, who was the clear winner or loser in the deal the buyer or the seller and what are your reasons??? and with a price of $258 per square foot , is that a good benchmark for buying properties in Del Cerro ? or should we see lower prices per sq foot ? much appreciated,Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 2:46 AM #212488AnonymousGuestKamFongasChinHO, so what is your conclusion on the 6486
Dwane closure, who was the clear winner or loser in the deal the buyer or the seller and what are your reasons??? and with a price of $258 per square foot , is that a good benchmark for buying properties in Del Cerro ? or should we see lower prices per sq foot ? much appreciated,Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 2:46 AM #212511AnonymousGuestKamFongasChinHO, so what is your conclusion on the 6486
Dwane closure, who was the clear winner or loser in the deal the buyer or the seller and what are your reasons??? and with a price of $258 per square foot , is that a good benchmark for buying properties in Del Cerro ? or should we see lower prices per sq foot ? much appreciated,Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 2:46 AM #212541AnonymousGuestKamFongasChinHO, so what is your conclusion on the 6486
Dwane closure, who was the clear winner or loser in the deal the buyer or the seller and what are your reasons??? and with a price of $258 per square foot , is that a good benchmark for buying properties in Del Cerro ? or should we see lower prices per sq foot ? much appreciated,Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 7:13 AM #212398poway_sellerParticipantVulture, if you ask that type of question on a Forum like this, the answer will ALWAYS be the buyer paid too much and prices should be under $200, or under $150, or under whatever price was actually paid. So, your answer from someone named KamFongasChinHO should bear no weight – whatsoever!
IMHO, the winner here was both parties. The buyer got a great home in a great neighborhood for a really fair price. Whether they underpaid or overpaid is of little consequence over the long term for this buyer who likely will live there for a long time. The seller won as well because they likely paid just a few hundred thousand for the home a long time ago, enjoyed it for many many years, raised their kids in it, and now have over $1.1m to buy a downsized home to live out their retirement. The agents won because they got 5% or more on the deal. There were no losers on this transaction.
Lastly, to take a square footage price and use that as a benchmark for other purchases is not logical (at least not on a single property). Hence the term is ‘comps’, not ‘comp’
May 28, 2008 at 7:13 AM #212472poway_sellerParticipantVulture, if you ask that type of question on a Forum like this, the answer will ALWAYS be the buyer paid too much and prices should be under $200, or under $150, or under whatever price was actually paid. So, your answer from someone named KamFongasChinHO should bear no weight – whatsoever!
IMHO, the winner here was both parties. The buyer got a great home in a great neighborhood for a really fair price. Whether they underpaid or overpaid is of little consequence over the long term for this buyer who likely will live there for a long time. The seller won as well because they likely paid just a few hundred thousand for the home a long time ago, enjoyed it for many many years, raised their kids in it, and now have over $1.1m to buy a downsized home to live out their retirement. The agents won because they got 5% or more on the deal. There were no losers on this transaction.
Lastly, to take a square footage price and use that as a benchmark for other purchases is not logical (at least not on a single property). Hence the term is ‘comps’, not ‘comp’
May 28, 2008 at 7:13 AM #212499poway_sellerParticipantVulture, if you ask that type of question on a Forum like this, the answer will ALWAYS be the buyer paid too much and prices should be under $200, or under $150, or under whatever price was actually paid. So, your answer from someone named KamFongasChinHO should bear no weight – whatsoever!
IMHO, the winner here was both parties. The buyer got a great home in a great neighborhood for a really fair price. Whether they underpaid or overpaid is of little consequence over the long term for this buyer who likely will live there for a long time. The seller won as well because they likely paid just a few hundred thousand for the home a long time ago, enjoyed it for many many years, raised their kids in it, and now have over $1.1m to buy a downsized home to live out their retirement. The agents won because they got 5% or more on the deal. There were no losers on this transaction.
Lastly, to take a square footage price and use that as a benchmark for other purchases is not logical (at least not on a single property). Hence the term is ‘comps’, not ‘comp’
May 28, 2008 at 7:13 AM #212520poway_sellerParticipantVulture, if you ask that type of question on a Forum like this, the answer will ALWAYS be the buyer paid too much and prices should be under $200, or under $150, or under whatever price was actually paid. So, your answer from someone named KamFongasChinHO should bear no weight – whatsoever!
IMHO, the winner here was both parties. The buyer got a great home in a great neighborhood for a really fair price. Whether they underpaid or overpaid is of little consequence over the long term for this buyer who likely will live there for a long time. The seller won as well because they likely paid just a few hundred thousand for the home a long time ago, enjoyed it for many many years, raised their kids in it, and now have over $1.1m to buy a downsized home to live out their retirement. The agents won because they got 5% or more on the deal. There were no losers on this transaction.
Lastly, to take a square footage price and use that as a benchmark for other purchases is not logical (at least not on a single property). Hence the term is ‘comps’, not ‘comp’
May 28, 2008 at 7:13 AM #212551poway_sellerParticipantVulture, if you ask that type of question on a Forum like this, the answer will ALWAYS be the buyer paid too much and prices should be under $200, or under $150, or under whatever price was actually paid. So, your answer from someone named KamFongasChinHO should bear no weight – whatsoever!
IMHO, the winner here was both parties. The buyer got a great home in a great neighborhood for a really fair price. Whether they underpaid or overpaid is of little consequence over the long term for this buyer who likely will live there for a long time. The seller won as well because they likely paid just a few hundred thousand for the home a long time ago, enjoyed it for many many years, raised their kids in it, and now have over $1.1m to buy a downsized home to live out their retirement. The agents won because they got 5% or more on the deal. There were no losers on this transaction.
Lastly, to take a square footage price and use that as a benchmark for other purchases is not logical (at least not on a single property). Hence the term is ‘comps’, not ‘comp’
May 28, 2008 at 7:32 AM #212417AnonymousGuestpoway_seller
thanks for your views which are logical and correct, Del Cerro seems like a lovely area worth investing in,
especially in downturn times like this.Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 7:32 AM #212492AnonymousGuestpoway_seller
thanks for your views which are logical and correct, Del Cerro seems like a lovely area worth investing in,
especially in downturn times like this.Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 7:32 AM #212519AnonymousGuestpoway_seller
thanks for your views which are logical and correct, Del Cerro seems like a lovely area worth investing in,
especially in downturn times like this.Vulture
May 28, 2008 at 7:32 AM #212540AnonymousGuestpoway_seller
thanks for your views which are logical and correct, Del Cerro seems like a lovely area worth investing in,
especially in downturn times like this.Vulture
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.