Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › define “speculator”
- This topic has 45 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2008 at 2:16 PM #214375May 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM #214486yooklidParticipant
Was there a down payment?
Was this the primary residence?
Was there an attempt to sell within 1 year of purchase?
Was exotic financing used?May 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM #214543yooklidParticipantWas there a down payment?
Was this the primary residence?
Was there an attempt to sell within 1 year of purchase?
Was exotic financing used?May 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM #214464yooklidParticipantWas there a down payment?
Was this the primary residence?
Was there an attempt to sell within 1 year of purchase?
Was exotic financing used?May 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM #214513yooklidParticipantWas there a down payment?
Was this the primary residence?
Was there an attempt to sell within 1 year of purchase?
Was exotic financing used?May 30, 2008 at 2:17 PM #214385yooklidParticipantWas there a down payment?
Was this the primary residence?
Was there an attempt to sell within 1 year of purchase?
Was exotic financing used?May 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM #214474PeaceParticipantSo why don’t they just say that:
“This bail-out is not for ‘non-owner-occupied’ properties”
May 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM #214496PeaceParticipantSo why don’t they just say that:
“This bail-out is not for ‘non-owner-occupied’ properties”
May 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM #214523PeaceParticipantSo why don’t they just say that:
“This bail-out is not for ‘non-owner-occupied’ properties”
May 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM #214395PeaceParticipantSo why don’t they just say that:
“This bail-out is not for ‘non-owner-occupied’ properties”
May 30, 2008 at 2:28 PM #214553PeaceParticipantSo why don’t they just say that:
“This bail-out is not for ‘non-owner-occupied’ properties”
May 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM #214506ltokudaParticipantFirst, I would ask if the house is owner occupied. If not, then I would view the property as a business investment.
Next, I would ask if the owner had the income necessary to service the mortgage payments (after any teaser rates expire) when he purchased the house. If not, then the owner was either betting that the house would appreciate in value or that he would somehow earn more money in the future. Either way, its speculative.
May 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM #214532ltokudaParticipantFirst, I would ask if the house is owner occupied. If not, then I would view the property as a business investment.
Next, I would ask if the owner had the income necessary to service the mortgage payments (after any teaser rates expire) when he purchased the house. If not, then the owner was either betting that the house would appreciate in value or that he would somehow earn more money in the future. Either way, its speculative.
May 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM #214405ltokudaParticipantFirst, I would ask if the house is owner occupied. If not, then I would view the property as a business investment.
Next, I would ask if the owner had the income necessary to service the mortgage payments (after any teaser rates expire) when he purchased the house. If not, then the owner was either betting that the house would appreciate in value or that he would somehow earn more money in the future. Either way, its speculative.
May 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM #214562ltokudaParticipantFirst, I would ask if the house is owner occupied. If not, then I would view the property as a business investment.
Next, I would ask if the owner had the income necessary to service the mortgage payments (after any teaser rates expire) when he purchased the house. If not, then the owner was either betting that the house would appreciate in value or that he would somehow earn more money in the future. Either way, its speculative.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.