- This topic has 410 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2008 at 1:58 PM #143181January 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM #142857patientlywaitingParticipant
Quite frankly this is just another case of the rich getting richer. Who will it help?
I quite agree with this but it's the price to pay to help out the banks which is what all the gov't intervention is designed to do. The middle class stimulus is all talk. The gov't is trying to do what is in our national interest — save our financial system.
Realistically, this is only going to help the people are barely affording their houses stay in houses.
But for the plentiful people who were novice "investors" in real estate and were counting on appreciation, the gov't action will be little consolation. They are already way underwater and nothing can save them. If someone is already $100,000 underwater and lost all his equity, reducing the cost of borrowing 2% won't do him any good. Those people will end up in foreclosure no matter what.
January 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM #143087patientlywaitingParticipantQuite frankly this is just another case of the rich getting richer. Who will it help?
I quite agree with this but it's the price to pay to help out the banks which is what all the gov't intervention is designed to do. The middle class stimulus is all talk. The gov't is trying to do what is in our national interest — save our financial system.
Realistically, this is only going to help the people are barely affording their houses stay in houses.
But for the plentiful people who were novice "investors" in real estate and were counting on appreciation, the gov't action will be little consolation. They are already way underwater and nothing can save them. If someone is already $100,000 underwater and lost all his equity, reducing the cost of borrowing 2% won't do him any good. Those people will end up in foreclosure no matter what.
January 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM #143094patientlywaitingParticipantQuite frankly this is just another case of the rich getting richer. Who will it help?
I quite agree with this but it's the price to pay to help out the banks which is what all the gov't intervention is designed to do. The middle class stimulus is all talk. The gov't is trying to do what is in our national interest — save our financial system.
Realistically, this is only going to help the people are barely affording their houses stay in houses.
But for the plentiful people who were novice "investors" in real estate and were counting on appreciation, the gov't action will be little consolation. They are already way underwater and nothing can save them. If someone is already $100,000 underwater and lost all his equity, reducing the cost of borrowing 2% won't do him any good. Those people will end up in foreclosure no matter what.
January 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM #143120patientlywaitingParticipantQuite frankly this is just another case of the rich getting richer. Who will it help?
I quite agree with this but it's the price to pay to help out the banks which is what all the gov't intervention is designed to do. The middle class stimulus is all talk. The gov't is trying to do what is in our national interest — save our financial system.
Realistically, this is only going to help the people are barely affording their houses stay in houses.
But for the plentiful people who were novice "investors" in real estate and were counting on appreciation, the gov't action will be little consolation. They are already way underwater and nothing can save them. If someone is already $100,000 underwater and lost all his equity, reducing the cost of borrowing 2% won't do him any good. Those people will end up in foreclosure no matter what.
January 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM #143186patientlywaitingParticipantQuite frankly this is just another case of the rich getting richer. Who will it help?
I quite agree with this but it's the price to pay to help out the banks which is what all the gov't intervention is designed to do. The middle class stimulus is all talk. The gov't is trying to do what is in our national interest — save our financial system.
Realistically, this is only going to help the people are barely affording their houses stay in houses.
But for the plentiful people who were novice "investors" in real estate and were counting on appreciation, the gov't action will be little consolation. They are already way underwater and nothing can save them. If someone is already $100,000 underwater and lost all his equity, reducing the cost of borrowing 2% won't do him any good. Those people will end up in foreclosure no matter what.
January 25, 2008 at 2:32 PM #142867SD RealtorParticipantUnfortunately Sandi Egan you have it upside down. I cannot think of a single case in history where more aggressive lending rates incentivizes any sellers to lower asking prices. If anything this incentivizes people who were pricing near the conforming 417k limit to ask for more.
I think more and more that a common misconception on Piggington is that people here project their prevailing thought processes on joe buyer out there in the world. The fact is that most posters here are more introspective then the average buyer. While the savy buyer measures value of a home with regards to market conditions, pricing, etc… many a buyer, dare I say a majority simply look at the mortgage payment. This is especially true in the 750k range of housing.
sdrealtor pegged it right non. This measure will simply help those who have money get more property. To think this will not help the dinc family on the fence about buying that 4S ranch or carmel valley home jump into the fray is wishful. How big of a dent will it make? Not sure but you cannot argue about the fact that it saves a couple hundred a month off a payment.
SD Realtor
January 25, 2008 at 2:32 PM #143097SD RealtorParticipantUnfortunately Sandi Egan you have it upside down. I cannot think of a single case in history where more aggressive lending rates incentivizes any sellers to lower asking prices. If anything this incentivizes people who were pricing near the conforming 417k limit to ask for more.
I think more and more that a common misconception on Piggington is that people here project their prevailing thought processes on joe buyer out there in the world. The fact is that most posters here are more introspective then the average buyer. While the savy buyer measures value of a home with regards to market conditions, pricing, etc… many a buyer, dare I say a majority simply look at the mortgage payment. This is especially true in the 750k range of housing.
sdrealtor pegged it right non. This measure will simply help those who have money get more property. To think this will not help the dinc family on the fence about buying that 4S ranch or carmel valley home jump into the fray is wishful. How big of a dent will it make? Not sure but you cannot argue about the fact that it saves a couple hundred a month off a payment.
SD Realtor
January 25, 2008 at 2:32 PM #143104SD RealtorParticipantUnfortunately Sandi Egan you have it upside down. I cannot think of a single case in history where more aggressive lending rates incentivizes any sellers to lower asking prices. If anything this incentivizes people who were pricing near the conforming 417k limit to ask for more.
I think more and more that a common misconception on Piggington is that people here project their prevailing thought processes on joe buyer out there in the world. The fact is that most posters here are more introspective then the average buyer. While the savy buyer measures value of a home with regards to market conditions, pricing, etc… many a buyer, dare I say a majority simply look at the mortgage payment. This is especially true in the 750k range of housing.
sdrealtor pegged it right non. This measure will simply help those who have money get more property. To think this will not help the dinc family on the fence about buying that 4S ranch or carmel valley home jump into the fray is wishful. How big of a dent will it make? Not sure but you cannot argue about the fact that it saves a couple hundred a month off a payment.
SD Realtor
January 25, 2008 at 2:32 PM #143131SD RealtorParticipantUnfortunately Sandi Egan you have it upside down. I cannot think of a single case in history where more aggressive lending rates incentivizes any sellers to lower asking prices. If anything this incentivizes people who were pricing near the conforming 417k limit to ask for more.
I think more and more that a common misconception on Piggington is that people here project their prevailing thought processes on joe buyer out there in the world. The fact is that most posters here are more introspective then the average buyer. While the savy buyer measures value of a home with regards to market conditions, pricing, etc… many a buyer, dare I say a majority simply look at the mortgage payment. This is especially true in the 750k range of housing.
sdrealtor pegged it right non. This measure will simply help those who have money get more property. To think this will not help the dinc family on the fence about buying that 4S ranch or carmel valley home jump into the fray is wishful. How big of a dent will it make? Not sure but you cannot argue about the fact that it saves a couple hundred a month off a payment.
SD Realtor
January 25, 2008 at 2:32 PM #143196SD RealtorParticipantUnfortunately Sandi Egan you have it upside down. I cannot think of a single case in history where more aggressive lending rates incentivizes any sellers to lower asking prices. If anything this incentivizes people who were pricing near the conforming 417k limit to ask for more.
I think more and more that a common misconception on Piggington is that people here project their prevailing thought processes on joe buyer out there in the world. The fact is that most posters here are more introspective then the average buyer. While the savy buyer measures value of a home with regards to market conditions, pricing, etc… many a buyer, dare I say a majority simply look at the mortgage payment. This is especially true in the 750k range of housing.
sdrealtor pegged it right non. This measure will simply help those who have money get more property. To think this will not help the dinc family on the fence about buying that 4S ranch or carmel valley home jump into the fray is wishful. How big of a dent will it make? Not sure but you cannot argue about the fact that it saves a couple hundred a month off a payment.
SD Realtor
January 25, 2008 at 2:55 PM #142877Sandi EganParticipantI knew it 🙁
January 25, 2008 at 2:55 PM #143107Sandi EganParticipantI knew it 🙁
January 25, 2008 at 2:55 PM #143115Sandi EganParticipantI knew it 🙁
January 25, 2008 at 2:55 PM #143141Sandi EganParticipantI knew it 🙁
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.