Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Clairemont most desirable areas
- This topic has 523 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM #555626May 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM #554666bearishgurlParticipant
Scarlett, I’ve had several co-workers that bought Mtn. Sts. property when they were brand new. The prices in the early sixties were $16K to $18K. As far as I know, they’re all still living there and retired. Again, keep this is mind when you want to focus on the occupations of Clairemont. It didn’t take a very high income to purchase property there back in the day, relative to now, as only 17% of HS graduates attended college back then. I’m stating this because you previously posted you and your spouse have an advanced education. For the most part, owners on Mtn. Sts. keep up their property. This is all you should be concerned with.
May 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM #554773bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, I’ve had several co-workers that bought Mtn. Sts. property when they were brand new. The prices in the early sixties were $16K to $18K. As far as I know, they’re all still living there and retired. Again, keep this is mind when you want to focus on the occupations of Clairemont. It didn’t take a very high income to purchase property there back in the day, relative to now, as only 17% of HS graduates attended college back then. I’m stating this because you previously posted you and your spouse have an advanced education. For the most part, owners on Mtn. Sts. keep up their property. This is all you should be concerned with.
May 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM #555256bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, I’ve had several co-workers that bought Mtn. Sts. property when they were brand new. The prices in the early sixties were $16K to $18K. As far as I know, they’re all still living there and retired. Again, keep this is mind when you want to focus on the occupations of Clairemont. It didn’t take a very high income to purchase property there back in the day, relative to now, as only 17% of HS graduates attended college back then. I’m stating this because you previously posted you and your spouse have an advanced education. For the most part, owners on Mtn. Sts. keep up their property. This is all you should be concerned with.
May 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM #555355bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, I’ve had several co-workers that bought Mtn. Sts. property when they were brand new. The prices in the early sixties were $16K to $18K. As far as I know, they’re all still living there and retired. Again, keep this is mind when you want to focus on the occupations of Clairemont. It didn’t take a very high income to purchase property there back in the day, relative to now, as only 17% of HS graduates attended college back then. I’m stating this because you previously posted you and your spouse have an advanced education. For the most part, owners on Mtn. Sts. keep up their property. This is all you should be concerned with.
May 26, 2010 at 10:09 PM #555630bearishgurlParticipantScarlett, I’ve had several co-workers that bought Mtn. Sts. property when they were brand new. The prices in the early sixties were $16K to $18K. As far as I know, they’re all still living there and retired. Again, keep this is mind when you want to focus on the occupations of Clairemont. It didn’t take a very high income to purchase property there back in the day, relative to now, as only 17% of HS graduates attended college back then. I’m stating this because you previously posted you and your spouse have an advanced education. For the most part, owners on Mtn. Sts. keep up their property. This is all you should be concerned with.
May 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #554676ScarlettParticipantExcellent info, thanks Bearishgurl, Sduuuude, UCGal! Many thanks. I am convinced we will give at least a good look. Commute would be so easy to La Jolla from there. And we could find a decent home for our price range.
I got it about the retired people, and I am absolutely fine with that. I have young kids but hopefully there will be some kids on the block.
I’ve looked online at some listings in the nicer areas and most like a good value on paper. plus no HOA or MR. And I like that there are no cookie-cutter houses. Of course, nothing beats seeing them in person.
the biggest issue remains schools, we’ll either go with Muir or others, public ones, that decent (which are???), or hopefully choice in La Jolla or UC schools.
Also,I noticed that the inventory is not so bad, compared with for example, Rancho Penasquitos.
May 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #554783ScarlettParticipantExcellent info, thanks Bearishgurl, Sduuuude, UCGal! Many thanks. I am convinced we will give at least a good look. Commute would be so easy to La Jolla from there. And we could find a decent home for our price range.
I got it about the retired people, and I am absolutely fine with that. I have young kids but hopefully there will be some kids on the block.
I’ve looked online at some listings in the nicer areas and most like a good value on paper. plus no HOA or MR. And I like that there are no cookie-cutter houses. Of course, nothing beats seeing them in person.
the biggest issue remains schools, we’ll either go with Muir or others, public ones, that decent (which are???), or hopefully choice in La Jolla or UC schools.
Also,I noticed that the inventory is not so bad, compared with for example, Rancho Penasquitos.
May 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #555266ScarlettParticipantExcellent info, thanks Bearishgurl, Sduuuude, UCGal! Many thanks. I am convinced we will give at least a good look. Commute would be so easy to La Jolla from there. And we could find a decent home for our price range.
I got it about the retired people, and I am absolutely fine with that. I have young kids but hopefully there will be some kids on the block.
I’ve looked online at some listings in the nicer areas and most like a good value on paper. plus no HOA or MR. And I like that there are no cookie-cutter houses. Of course, nothing beats seeing them in person.
the biggest issue remains schools, we’ll either go with Muir or others, public ones, that decent (which are???), or hopefully choice in La Jolla or UC schools.
Also,I noticed that the inventory is not so bad, compared with for example, Rancho Penasquitos.
May 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #555365ScarlettParticipantExcellent info, thanks Bearishgurl, Sduuuude, UCGal! Many thanks. I am convinced we will give at least a good look. Commute would be so easy to La Jolla from there. And we could find a decent home for our price range.
I got it about the retired people, and I am absolutely fine with that. I have young kids but hopefully there will be some kids on the block.
I’ve looked online at some listings in the nicer areas and most like a good value on paper. plus no HOA or MR. And I like that there are no cookie-cutter houses. Of course, nothing beats seeing them in person.
the biggest issue remains schools, we’ll either go with Muir or others, public ones, that decent (which are???), or hopefully choice in La Jolla or UC schools.
Also,I noticed that the inventory is not so bad, compared with for example, Rancho Penasquitos.
May 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM #555640ScarlettParticipantExcellent info, thanks Bearishgurl, Sduuuude, UCGal! Many thanks. I am convinced we will give at least a good look. Commute would be so easy to La Jolla from there. And we could find a decent home for our price range.
I got it about the retired people, and I am absolutely fine with that. I have young kids but hopefully there will be some kids on the block.
I’ve looked online at some listings in the nicer areas and most like a good value on paper. plus no HOA or MR. And I like that there are no cookie-cutter houses. Of course, nothing beats seeing them in person.
the biggest issue remains schools, we’ll either go with Muir or others, public ones, that decent (which are???), or hopefully choice in La Jolla or UC schools.
Also,I noticed that the inventory is not so bad, compared with for example, Rancho Penasquitos.
May 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM #554686sdduuuudeParticipantGetting out before the kids get to high school may be a plan. It is, indeed, ours.
Holmes, I believe, is one of the better ones. Neighbors who go there are happy with it. Choice into Curie or other UTC school to avoid Madison High and Clairemont High.
May 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM #554793sdduuuudeParticipantGetting out before the kids get to high school may be a plan. It is, indeed, ours.
Holmes, I believe, is one of the better ones. Neighbors who go there are happy with it. Choice into Curie or other UTC school to avoid Madison High and Clairemont High.
May 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM #555276sdduuuudeParticipantGetting out before the kids get to high school may be a plan. It is, indeed, ours.
Holmes, I believe, is one of the better ones. Neighbors who go there are happy with it. Choice into Curie or other UTC school to avoid Madison High and Clairemont High.
May 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM #555374sdduuuudeParticipantGetting out before the kids get to high school may be a plan. It is, indeed, ours.
Holmes, I believe, is one of the better ones. Neighbors who go there are happy with it. Choice into Curie or other UTC school to avoid Madison High and Clairemont High.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.