Clairemont most desirable areas

[NotCranky]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Russell]Where did I say I live in a superior community? Jamul would be off topic on this thread right?Actually, not fighting for my neighborhood here.If I mentioned Jamul I apologize for the thread-jack.[/quote]

You didn’t Russell. sdduuuuude gave you away :)[/quote]
Sdddude admitted that Jamul is a superior community? That’ll be the day.

[an]

[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, I know you can find something in 92110, 92111, 92117, 92121 or 92122 that meets your needs if you are patient and are not afraid of a little work (that doesn’t have to be done all at once).[/quote]
I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.

[an]

[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, I know you can find something in 92110, 92111, 92117, 92121 or 92122 that meets your needs if you are patient and are not afraid of a little work (that doesn’t have to be done all at once).[/quote]
I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.

[an]

[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, I know you can find something in 92110, 92111, 92117, 92121 or 92122 that meets your needs if you are patient and are not afraid of a little work (that doesn’t have to be done all at once).[/quote]
I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.

[an]

[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, I know you can find something in 92110, 92111, 92117, 92121 or 92122 that meets your needs if you are patient and are not afraid of a little work (that doesn’t have to be done all at once).[/quote]
I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.

[an]

[quote=bearishgurl]Scarlett, I know you can find something in 92110, 92111, 92117, 92121 or 92122 that meets your needs if you are patient and are not afraid of a little work (that doesn’t have to be done all at once).[/quote]
I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=AN]I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.[/quote]

Well, 1500 sf is not big enough for Scarlett’s family, so revise her zip shopping list for me, will ya, AN?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=AN]I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.[/quote]

Well, 1500 sf is not big enough for Scarlett’s family, so revise her zip shopping list for me, will ya, AN?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=AN]I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.[/quote]

Well, 1500 sf is not big enough for Scarlett’s family, so revise her zip shopping list for me, will ya, AN?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=AN]I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.[/quote]

Well, 1500 sf is not big enough for Scarlett’s family, so revise her zip shopping list for me, will ya, AN?

[bearishgurl]

[quote=AN]I would remove 92121 and add 92126 instead. The problem with 92121 is that it was built right around the bottom of the last cycle, so most of those owners don’t really need to sell. Which causes a lack of inventory. The lowest I’ve seen any houses in 92121 sold is high 500s. Those 1500 sq-ft single story don’t come on the market too often.[/quote]

Well, 1500 sf is not big enough for Scarlett’s family, so revise her zip shopping list for me, will ya, AN?

[Scarlett]

Kids can’t really judge a school at this age, can they?

As a kid I’d probably have been very happy with fewer classes and less homework, and had time to make more friends and play too. But in retrospect, it may not have been good for me in the LONG run. Peer influence is high – in good things as well as in bad things. If my classmates would not have listened to teacher, skip classes, etc. I’d probably have joined them at least some of the time. I’d have had a great time, and the approval of my peers, but not good for my education.

My point is, the kids would be happy in any school, they can’t discriminate at this age. So that’s why as a parent I am choosing for them to the best of my knowledge – within some limits. I am not going for the very best. Yes, it is up to the kid, but the schools and the demographic help a lot too.

30 years ago, only 30% of high school grads went to college. But in my age group, I think the % is at least twice that, if not higher. I don’t KNOW anybody in my peers who didn’t go to college.

[Scarlett]

Kids can’t really judge a school at this age, can they?

As a kid I’d probably have been very happy with fewer classes and less homework, and had time to make more friends and play too. But in retrospect, it may not have been good for me in the LONG run. Peer influence is high – in good things as well as in bad things. If my classmates would not have listened to teacher, skip classes, etc. I’d probably have joined them at least some of the time. I’d have had a great time, and the approval of my peers, but not good for my education.

My point is, the kids would be happy in any school, they can’t discriminate at this age. So that’s why as a parent I am choosing for them to the best of my knowledge – within some limits. I am not going for the very best. Yes, it is up to the kid, but the schools and the demographic help a lot too.

30 years ago, only 30% of high school grads went to college. But in my age group, I think the % is at least twice that, if not higher. I don’t KNOW anybody in my peers who didn’t go to college.

[Scarlett]

Kids can’t really judge a school at this age, can they?

As a kid I’d probably have been very happy with fewer classes and less homework, and had time to make more friends and play too. But in retrospect, it may not have been good for me in the LONG run. Peer influence is high – in good things as well as in bad things. If my classmates would not have listened to teacher, skip classes, etc. I’d probably have joined them at least some of the time. I’d have had a great time, and the approval of my peers, but not good for my education.

My point is, the kids would be happy in any school, they can’t discriminate at this age. So that’s why as a parent I am choosing for them to the best of my knowledge – within some limits. I am not going for the very best. Yes, it is up to the kid, but the schools and the demographic help a lot too.

30 years ago, only 30% of high school grads went to college. But in my age group, I think the % is at least twice that, if not higher. I don’t KNOW anybody in my peers who didn’t go to college.

[Scarlett]

Kids can’t really judge a school at this age, can they?

As a kid I’d probably have been very happy with fewer classes and less homework, and had time to make more friends and play too. But in retrospect, it may not have been good for me in the LONG run. Peer influence is high – in good things as well as in bad things. If my classmates would not have listened to teacher, skip classes, etc. I’d probably have joined them at least some of the time. I’d have had a great time, and the approval of my peers, but not good for my education.

My point is, the kids would be happy in any school, they can’t discriminate at this age. So that’s why as a parent I am choosing for them to the best of my knowledge – within some limits. I am not going for the very best. Yes, it is up to the kid, but the schools and the demographic help a lot too.

30 years ago, only 30% of high school grads went to college. But in my age group, I think the % is at least twice that, if not higher. I don’t KNOW anybody in my peers who didn’t go to college.

[Author]

Posts