- This topic has 32 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 8 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 23, 2008 at 1:15 PM #12832May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM #210706meadandaleParticipant
Expect to see this more and more.
I’d surmise that within the next 2 decades, the vast majority of the general fund at the city and state level will be paying for healthcare and retirement benefits for employees. The federal government isn’t far behind since they’ve spent every penny of the SS “trust fund” and there is nothing but a box full of IOU’s that will have to be paid with increased taxes in the future.
It really irks me when so many public employees argue that they are ‘entitled’ to their retirement benefits because they earned less in the public sector. That’s rarely true anymore.
May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM #210859meadandaleParticipantExpect to see this more and more.
I’d surmise that within the next 2 decades, the vast majority of the general fund at the city and state level will be paying for healthcare and retirement benefits for employees. The federal government isn’t far behind since they’ve spent every penny of the SS “trust fund” and there is nothing but a box full of IOU’s that will have to be paid with increased taxes in the future.
It really irks me when so many public employees argue that they are ‘entitled’ to their retirement benefits because they earned less in the public sector. That’s rarely true anymore.
May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM #210775meadandaleParticipantExpect to see this more and more.
I’d surmise that within the next 2 decades, the vast majority of the general fund at the city and state level will be paying for healthcare and retirement benefits for employees. The federal government isn’t far behind since they’ve spent every penny of the SS “trust fund” and there is nothing but a box full of IOU’s that will have to be paid with increased taxes in the future.
It really irks me when so many public employees argue that they are ‘entitled’ to their retirement benefits because they earned less in the public sector. That’s rarely true anymore.
May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM #210823meadandaleParticipantExpect to see this more and more.
I’d surmise that within the next 2 decades, the vast majority of the general fund at the city and state level will be paying for healthcare and retirement benefits for employees. The federal government isn’t far behind since they’ve spent every penny of the SS “trust fund” and there is nothing but a box full of IOU’s that will have to be paid with increased taxes in the future.
It really irks me when so many public employees argue that they are ‘entitled’ to their retirement benefits because they earned less in the public sector. That’s rarely true anymore.
May 23, 2008 at 2:42 PM #210802meadandaleParticipantExpect to see this more and more.
I’d surmise that within the next 2 decades, the vast majority of the general fund at the city and state level will be paying for healthcare and retirement benefits for employees. The federal government isn’t far behind since they’ve spent every penny of the SS “trust fund” and there is nothing but a box full of IOU’s that will have to be paid with increased taxes in the future.
It really irks me when so many public employees argue that they are ‘entitled’ to their retirement benefits because they earned less in the public sector. That’s rarely true anymore.
May 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM #210822kewpParticipantVallejo was pretty insane. Lots of police and fireman making in the range of 200-300k per year.
Its dangerous work for sure, but the same jobs in Detroit and NYC pay much less.
May 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM #210879kewpParticipantVallejo was pretty insane. Lots of police and fireman making in the range of 200-300k per year.
Its dangerous work for sure, but the same jobs in Detroit and NYC pay much less.
May 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM #210844kewpParticipantVallejo was pretty insane. Lots of police and fireman making in the range of 200-300k per year.
Its dangerous work for sure, but the same jobs in Detroit and NYC pay much less.
May 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM #210795kewpParticipantVallejo was pretty insane. Lots of police and fireman making in the range of 200-300k per year.
Its dangerous work for sure, but the same jobs in Detroit and NYC pay much less.
May 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM #210726kewpParticipantVallejo was pretty insane. Lots of police and fireman making in the range of 200-300k per year.
Its dangerous work for sure, but the same jobs in Detroit and NYC pay much less.
May 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM #210915michaelParticipantI personally don’t see why police and fire people get paid what they do. Dangerous work? Sure. So is working at 7-11. The way I see it, everyone makes decisions. Cops and firemen make a decision to be public servants. If they wanted to make money, they could have chosen a different career. Lets admit it, they ain’t the sharpest tools in the shed (as a group).
A cop or fireman dies, big funeral, family taken care of to some extent by tax payers. Military service man or woman dies, not much attention, family left to themselves.
I have friends that are firemen and cops. Some even admit that they are overpaid. Perhaps the Vallejo example will help shed light on the “abuses” of unions and incompetent public officials.
May 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM #210830michaelParticipantI personally don’t see why police and fire people get paid what they do. Dangerous work? Sure. So is working at 7-11. The way I see it, everyone makes decisions. Cops and firemen make a decision to be public servants. If they wanted to make money, they could have chosen a different career. Lets admit it, they ain’t the sharpest tools in the shed (as a group).
A cop or fireman dies, big funeral, family taken care of to some extent by tax payers. Military service man or woman dies, not much attention, family left to themselves.
I have friends that are firemen and cops. Some even admit that they are overpaid. Perhaps the Vallejo example will help shed light on the “abuses” of unions and incompetent public officials.
May 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM #210857michaelParticipantI personally don’t see why police and fire people get paid what they do. Dangerous work? Sure. So is working at 7-11. The way I see it, everyone makes decisions. Cops and firemen make a decision to be public servants. If they wanted to make money, they could have chosen a different career. Lets admit it, they ain’t the sharpest tools in the shed (as a group).
A cop or fireman dies, big funeral, family taken care of to some extent by tax payers. Military service man or woman dies, not much attention, family left to themselves.
I have friends that are firemen and cops. Some even admit that they are overpaid. Perhaps the Vallejo example will help shed light on the “abuses” of unions and incompetent public officials.
May 23, 2008 at 4:39 PM #210761michaelParticipantI personally don’t see why police and fire people get paid what they do. Dangerous work? Sure. So is working at 7-11. The way I see it, everyone makes decisions. Cops and firemen make a decision to be public servants. If they wanted to make money, they could have chosen a different career. Lets admit it, they ain’t the sharpest tools in the shed (as a group).
A cop or fireman dies, big funeral, family taken care of to some extent by tax payers. Military service man or woman dies, not much attention, family left to themselves.
I have friends that are firemen and cops. Some even admit that they are overpaid. Perhaps the Vallejo example will help shed light on the “abuses” of unions and incompetent public officials.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.