- This topic has 330 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM #522571March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #521675briansd1Guest
[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #521816briansd1Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522245briansd1Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522338briansd1Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522596briansd1Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #521680briansd1Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #521821briansd1Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522250briansd1Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522343briansd1Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522601briansd1Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #521685briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #521826briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #522254briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #522348briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.