- This topic has 330 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM #522571March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #521675
briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #521816briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522245briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522338briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM #522596briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Oh please, did you even read the fine print in what obama considered the Cadillac plans when it was originally written? Why did the unions oppose these taxes? Because a lot of those plans from those unions were considered cadillac plans. In fact a lot of employer sponsored plans would end up being cadillac plans.[/quote]I still don’t see a generous plan being taxes. That’s part of compensation and should be taxes.
If we allow compensation to got untaxed then employers will just shift some compensation to the untaxed portion (health insurance, life insurance).
Seems fair to me.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #521680briansd1
Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #521821briansd1
Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522250briansd1
Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522343briansd1
Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM #522601briansd1
Guest[quote=LA Reader]
In the end, true health care reform will only happen when the cost becomes so large that even large corporations and government have to drop medical insurance as part of benefit package.
[/quote]That is very true.
But the the mean time, the more people we cover, the better.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #521685briansd1
Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #521826briansd1
Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #522254briansd1
Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
March 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM #522348briansd1
Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]Free will.[/quote]
Glad that you see there is such thing as choice when it comes to abortion.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
