- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by ljinvestor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 10, 2011 at 11:36 AM #708766July 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM #710006SD RealtorParticipant
Sk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
To the OP… The HOA will not have any opinion on whether you can finance the home or not and frankly it would be a liability for them to make any statement as such. All you can get from them is whether there is any on going or past litigation and whether there have been any builders defects. Have your realtor look at all of the sales in the conplex for the past several years to see if any of those deals were financed. Try to get the hoa to give you the property managers number to get the owner occupancy although it should not matter since you are purchasing the home as a rental.
Don’t expect help from the hoa, you are on your own so make sure ytou have a good lender who will not make promises up front that they cannot keep. Since it is a short sale then things are not going to happen for awhile anyways. If you are gonna use cash then hopefully you can get a better deal.
July 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM #708893SD RealtorParticipantSk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
To the OP… The HOA will not have any opinion on whether you can finance the home or not and frankly it would be a liability for them to make any statement as such. All you can get from them is whether there is any on going or past litigation and whether there have been any builders defects. Have your realtor look at all of the sales in the conplex for the past several years to see if any of those deals were financed. Try to get the hoa to give you the property managers number to get the owner occupancy although it should not matter since you are purchasing the home as a rental.
Don’t expect help from the hoa, you are on your own so make sure ytou have a good lender who will not make promises up front that they cannot keep. Since it is a short sale then things are not going to happen for awhile anyways. If you are gonna use cash then hopefully you can get a better deal.
July 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM #709491SD RealtorParticipantSk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
To the OP… The HOA will not have any opinion on whether you can finance the home or not and frankly it would be a liability for them to make any statement as such. All you can get from them is whether there is any on going or past litigation and whether there have been any builders defects. Have your realtor look at all of the sales in the conplex for the past several years to see if any of those deals were financed. Try to get the hoa to give you the property managers number to get the owner occupancy although it should not matter since you are purchasing the home as a rental.
Don’t expect help from the hoa, you are on your own so make sure ytou have a good lender who will not make promises up front that they cannot keep. Since it is a short sale then things are not going to happen for awhile anyways. If you are gonna use cash then hopefully you can get a better deal.
July 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM #709643SD RealtorParticipantSk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
To the OP… The HOA will not have any opinion on whether you can finance the home or not and frankly it would be a liability for them to make any statement as such. All you can get from them is whether there is any on going or past litigation and whether there have been any builders defects. Have your realtor look at all of the sales in the conplex for the past several years to see if any of those deals were financed. Try to get the hoa to give you the property managers number to get the owner occupancy although it should not matter since you are purchasing the home as a rental.
Don’t expect help from the hoa, you are on your own so make sure ytou have a good lender who will not make promises up front that they cannot keep. Since it is a short sale then things are not going to happen for awhile anyways. If you are gonna use cash then hopefully you can get a better deal.
July 10, 2011 at 1:41 PM #708796SD RealtorParticipantSk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
To the OP… The HOA will not have any opinion on whether you can finance the home or not and frankly it would be a liability for them to make any statement as such. All you can get from them is whether there is any on going or past litigation and whether there have been any builders defects. Have your realtor look at all of the sales in the conplex for the past several years to see if any of those deals were financed. Try to get the hoa to give you the property managers number to get the owner occupancy although it should not matter since you are purchasing the home as a rental.
Don’t expect help from the hoa, you are on your own so make sure ytou have a good lender who will not make promises up front that they cannot keep. Since it is a short sale then things are not going to happen for awhile anyways. If you are gonna use cash then hopefully you can get a better deal.
July 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM #708903AKParticipantIsn’t there a minimum owner-occupancy requirement for FHA or GSE financing? I think 50% minimum though Fannie, Freddie, and FHA use slightly different calculations.
If that’s what is causing financing problems I’d doubt that owner occupancy will increase in the near future, if ever. Hope that unit is cash-flow positive!
July 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM #710016AKParticipantIsn’t there a minimum owner-occupancy requirement for FHA or GSE financing? I think 50% minimum though Fannie, Freddie, and FHA use slightly different calculations.
If that’s what is causing financing problems I’d doubt that owner occupancy will increase in the near future, if ever. Hope that unit is cash-flow positive!
July 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM #709501AKParticipantIsn’t there a minimum owner-occupancy requirement for FHA or GSE financing? I think 50% minimum though Fannie, Freddie, and FHA use slightly different calculations.
If that’s what is causing financing problems I’d doubt that owner occupancy will increase in the near future, if ever. Hope that unit is cash-flow positive!
July 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM #708806AKParticipantIsn’t there a minimum owner-occupancy requirement for FHA or GSE financing? I think 50% minimum though Fannie, Freddie, and FHA use slightly different calculations.
If that’s what is causing financing problems I’d doubt that owner occupancy will increase in the near future, if ever. Hope that unit is cash-flow positive!
July 10, 2011 at 2:26 PM #709653AKParticipantIsn’t there a minimum owner-occupancy requirement for FHA or GSE financing? I think 50% minimum though Fannie, Freddie, and FHA use slightly different calculations.
If that’s what is causing financing problems I’d doubt that owner occupancy will increase in the near future, if ever. Hope that unit is cash-flow positive!
July 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM #710077SK in CVParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Sk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
[/quote]
The buyer was intending to occupy the unit. But was willing to pay non-owner occupied rates. But there were a couple problems that made a loan a practical impossiblity. The GSE and FHA requirement for owner occupancy I believe is currently 51%, which kind of strangely includes REO as owner occupied. I believe the complex barely met that requirement. But there is (or at least one time was ) also a requirement that no single owner owns more than 10% of the units. Back in the old days this wouldn’t be a fatal flaw. There were always the private lenders. (I think private money MBS’s are still dead.) So the choices are conventional or warehouse lender. And apparently, for low owner occupancy condo projects and/or complexes with a single owner owning a high percentage of the units, there is no such thing as private money. The very few warehouse lenders won’t lend on those kinds of projects either. At least wouldn’t lend on this particular project, and it may be the same thing with the OP’s project.
But you’re right, it could also be ongoing CD litigation.
July 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM #709713SK in CVParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Sk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
[/quote]
The buyer was intending to occupy the unit. But was willing to pay non-owner occupied rates. But there were a couple problems that made a loan a practical impossiblity. The GSE and FHA requirement for owner occupancy I believe is currently 51%, which kind of strangely includes REO as owner occupied. I believe the complex barely met that requirement. But there is (or at least one time was ) also a requirement that no single owner owns more than 10% of the units. Back in the old days this wouldn’t be a fatal flaw. There were always the private lenders. (I think private money MBS’s are still dead.) So the choices are conventional or warehouse lender. And apparently, for low owner occupancy condo projects and/or complexes with a single owner owning a high percentage of the units, there is no such thing as private money. The very few warehouse lenders won’t lend on those kinds of projects either. At least wouldn’t lend on this particular project, and it may be the same thing with the OP’s project.
But you’re right, it could also be ongoing CD litigation.
July 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM #709561SK in CVParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Sk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
[/quote]
The buyer was intending to occupy the unit. But was willing to pay non-owner occupied rates. But there were a couple problems that made a loan a practical impossiblity. The GSE and FHA requirement for owner occupancy I believe is currently 51%, which kind of strangely includes REO as owner occupied. I believe the complex barely met that requirement. But there is (or at least one time was ) also a requirement that no single owner owns more than 10% of the units. Back in the old days this wouldn’t be a fatal flaw. There were always the private lenders. (I think private money MBS’s are still dead.) So the choices are conventional or warehouse lender. And apparently, for low owner occupancy condo projects and/or complexes with a single owner owning a high percentage of the units, there is no such thing as private money. The very few warehouse lenders won’t lend on those kinds of projects either. At least wouldn’t lend on this particular project, and it may be the same thing with the OP’s project.
But you’re right, it could also be ongoing CD litigation.
July 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM #708963SK in CVParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]Sk clearly your case was an exception. Also if the condo you were talking about was going to be purchased as an owner occupied unit but all of the sudden someone makes a bulk purchase to throw the ratios completely out of whack then of course a lender will not loan on it for owner occupants. No lender would. Was the property for owner occupancy or for an investment?
[/quote]
The buyer was intending to occupy the unit. But was willing to pay non-owner occupied rates. But there were a couple problems that made a loan a practical impossiblity. The GSE and FHA requirement for owner occupancy I believe is currently 51%, which kind of strangely includes REO as owner occupied. I believe the complex barely met that requirement. But there is (or at least one time was ) also a requirement that no single owner owns more than 10% of the units. Back in the old days this wouldn’t be a fatal flaw. There were always the private lenders. (I think private money MBS’s are still dead.) So the choices are conventional or warehouse lender. And apparently, for low owner occupancy condo projects and/or complexes with a single owner owning a high percentage of the units, there is no such thing as private money. The very few warehouse lenders won’t lend on those kinds of projects either. At least wouldn’t lend on this particular project, and it may be the same thing with the OP’s project.
But you’re right, it could also be ongoing CD litigation.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.