- This topic has 45 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 29, 2008 at 9:26 AM #196128April 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM #196081
Fearful
ParticipantI am a little surprised that knowledge of the changed conforming loan limits did not affect the February slide.
Regarding your 15-20%, assuming the real (deflated by CPI) bottom is reached in 2012, and prices reach the 1997 nadir, the prices have now got about 40% yet to go on a nominal basis.
April 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM #196160Fearful
ParticipantI am a little surprised that knowledge of the changed conforming loan limits did not affect the February slide.
Regarding your 15-20%, assuming the real (deflated by CPI) bottom is reached in 2012, and prices reach the 1997 nadir, the prices have now got about 40% yet to go on a nominal basis.
April 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM #196139Fearful
ParticipantI am a little surprised that knowledge of the changed conforming loan limits did not affect the February slide.
Regarding your 15-20%, assuming the real (deflated by CPI) bottom is reached in 2012, and prices reach the 1997 nadir, the prices have now got about 40% yet to go on a nominal basis.
April 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM #196113Fearful
ParticipantI am a little surprised that knowledge of the changed conforming loan limits did not affect the February slide.
Regarding your 15-20%, assuming the real (deflated by CPI) bottom is reached in 2012, and prices reach the 1997 nadir, the prices have now got about 40% yet to go on a nominal basis.
April 29, 2008 at 10:32 AM #196198Fearful
ParticipantI am a little surprised that knowledge of the changed conforming loan limits did not affect the February slide.
Regarding your 15-20%, assuming the real (deflated by CPI) bottom is reached in 2012, and prices reach the 1997 nadir, the prices have now got about 40% yet to go on a nominal basis.
April 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM #196169Anonymous
GuestI am not surprised that the change in conforming limits did not change the slide. Two things, although they are backed by the gov’t they are still marketed as higher risk bonds, therefore a higher rate than the less than $417K loans. In order to qualify as conforming you need to have: a FICO greater than 700, documented income, and a down payment. Mortgage brokers and realtors are quick to point out that these requirements are “onerous” and help out no one.
Which tells a bigger story of “pent-up” supply. How long until most of the over encumbered “owners” succumb and prices really start to fall?
April 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM #196208Anonymous
GuestI am not surprised that the change in conforming limits did not change the slide. Two things, although they are backed by the gov’t they are still marketed as higher risk bonds, therefore a higher rate than the less than $417K loans. In order to qualify as conforming you need to have: a FICO greater than 700, documented income, and a down payment. Mortgage brokers and realtors are quick to point out that these requirements are “onerous” and help out no one.
Which tells a bigger story of “pent-up” supply. How long until most of the over encumbered “owners” succumb and prices really start to fall?
April 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM #196148Anonymous
GuestI am not surprised that the change in conforming limits did not change the slide. Two things, although they are backed by the gov’t they are still marketed as higher risk bonds, therefore a higher rate than the less than $417K loans. In order to qualify as conforming you need to have: a FICO greater than 700, documented income, and a down payment. Mortgage brokers and realtors are quick to point out that these requirements are “onerous” and help out no one.
Which tells a bigger story of “pent-up” supply. How long until most of the over encumbered “owners” succumb and prices really start to fall?
April 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM #196125Anonymous
GuestI am not surprised that the change in conforming limits did not change the slide. Two things, although they are backed by the gov’t they are still marketed as higher risk bonds, therefore a higher rate than the less than $417K loans. In order to qualify as conforming you need to have: a FICO greater than 700, documented income, and a down payment. Mortgage brokers and realtors are quick to point out that these requirements are “onerous” and help out no one.
Which tells a bigger story of “pent-up” supply. How long until most of the over encumbered “owners” succumb and prices really start to fall?
April 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM #196091Anonymous
GuestI am not surprised that the change in conforming limits did not change the slide. Two things, although they are backed by the gov’t they are still marketed as higher risk bonds, therefore a higher rate than the less than $417K loans. In order to qualify as conforming you need to have: a FICO greater than 700, documented income, and a down payment. Mortgage brokers and realtors are quick to point out that these requirements are “onerous” and help out no one.
Which tells a bigger story of “pent-up” supply. How long until most of the over encumbered “owners” succumb and prices really start to fall?
April 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM #196132beanmaestro
ParticipantFearful,
I’d expect that the increase in down payment requirements takes a lot of the less educated buyers out of the game. If you have $50-100k in savings, you’ve probably put more thought into where the market is going, and whether it makes sense to wait a year. Cash in hand probably correlates reasonably well with the ability to delay gratification while prices are plummeting.
April 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM #196179beanmaestro
ParticipantFearful,
I’d expect that the increase in down payment requirements takes a lot of the less educated buyers out of the game. If you have $50-100k in savings, you’ve probably put more thought into where the market is going, and whether it makes sense to wait a year. Cash in hand probably correlates reasonably well with the ability to delay gratification while prices are plummeting.
April 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM #196101beanmaestro
ParticipantFearful,
I’d expect that the increase in down payment requirements takes a lot of the less educated buyers out of the game. If you have $50-100k in savings, you’ve probably put more thought into where the market is going, and whether it makes sense to wait a year. Cash in hand probably correlates reasonably well with the ability to delay gratification while prices are plummeting.
April 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM #196158beanmaestro
ParticipantFearful,
I’d expect that the increase in down payment requirements takes a lot of the less educated buyers out of the game. If you have $50-100k in savings, you’ve probably put more thought into where the market is going, and whether it makes sense to wait a year. Cash in hand probably correlates reasonably well with the ability to delay gratification while prices are plummeting.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.