Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Carmel Valley Single Family Home below 600K
- This topic has 177 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 13, 2007 at 6:20 PM #88814October 13, 2007 at 6:30 PM #88809CoronitaParticipant
I'll be curious to find out what really is behind this unit.
1) It could be seller is trying to sell $599-$669k with original purchase price of $494k.
or
2) $599k short sale, because of a $494k and a $150k second loan.
The former is hardly considered a desperate seller. The latter would be a desperate seller.
If I would bet money on it, I would say it's #1 more likely than #2. Furthermore, I'd bet that the couple would would rather rent at a loss versus take a bath in the sales loss. Hence, the hanging on to dear life expression i said in another thread. I'm not saying it's smart or dumb… You just have to understand the culture.
I'll bookmark this to see which way it entails. even at $600k, this home is still ridiculously overpriced per sqft…Don't know if any of you noticed, but it's around 1600sqft….
October 13, 2007 at 6:30 PM #88816CoronitaParticipantI'll be curious to find out what really is behind this unit.
1) It could be seller is trying to sell $599-$669k with original purchase price of $494k.
or
2) $599k short sale, because of a $494k and a $150k second loan.
The former is hardly considered a desperate seller. The latter would be a desperate seller.
If I would bet money on it, I would say it's #1 more likely than #2. Furthermore, I'd bet that the couple would would rather rent at a loss versus take a bath in the sales loss. Hence, the hanging on to dear life expression i said in another thread. I'm not saying it's smart or dumb… You just have to understand the culture.
I'll bookmark this to see which way it entails. even at $600k, this home is still ridiculously overpriced per sqft…Don't know if any of you noticed, but it's around 1600sqft….
November 17, 2007 at 1:55 AM #100380sdworkerParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the “hang on and rent” option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
November 17, 2007 at 1:55 AM #100461sdworkerParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the “hang on and rent” option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
November 17, 2007 at 1:55 AM #100478sdworkerParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the “hang on and rent” option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
November 17, 2007 at 1:55 AM #100492sdworkerParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the “hang on and rent” option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
November 17, 2007 at 1:55 AM #100494sdworkerParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the “hang on and rent” option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
November 17, 2007 at 2:03 AM #100390CoronitaParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the "hang on and rent" option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
I thought that would be the case…I guess I'm still looking for the asian family that violates the "hanging on no matter what" syndrome…Although I think I might have found one. One of my neighbors that bought about 5-6 months ago and overpaid just put their home on the block again. Interesting.
November 17, 2007 at 2:03 AM #100471CoronitaParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the "hang on and rent" option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
I thought that would be the case…I guess I'm still looking for the asian family that violates the "hanging on no matter what" syndrome…Although I think I might have found one. One of my neighbors that bought about 5-6 months ago and overpaid just put their home on the block again. Interesting.
November 17, 2007 at 2:03 AM #100488CoronitaParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the "hang on and rent" option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
I thought that would be the case…I guess I'm still looking for the asian family that violates the "hanging on no matter what" syndrome…Although I think I might have found one. One of my neighbors that bought about 5-6 months ago and overpaid just put their home on the block again. Interesting.
November 17, 2007 at 2:03 AM #100502CoronitaParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the "hang on and rent" option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
I thought that would be the case…I guess I'm still looking for the asian family that violates the "hanging on no matter what" syndrome…Although I think I might have found one. One of my neighbors that bought about 5-6 months ago and overpaid just put their home on the block again. Interesting.
November 17, 2007 at 2:03 AM #100504CoronitaParticipantI actually looked at this property this week as a rental. The listing agent showed it to me and they purchased a larger home in Carmel Valley somewhere. So they went to the "hang on and rent" option. It was in very nice condition, was upgraded to some degree and had a very decent sized back yard for the size of the home.
I thought that would be the case…I guess I'm still looking for the asian family that violates the "hanging on no matter what" syndrome…Although I think I might have found one. One of my neighbors that bought about 5-6 months ago and overpaid just put their home on the block again. Interesting.
November 17, 2007 at 2:23 AM #100400EugeneParticipantLast sale on 10/31/2003 was for $494,621. So, did they borrow another $100K+ on top? Wow! a lot of middle and upper middle class families with negative net worth.
It gets much worse than that. I’ve been researching the situation in 92122 a couple of days ago. It’s basically a big island of denial, stable prices, very few listings, low foreclosure rates, etc.. What caught my attention was the kind of foreclosures they were getting.
2/3 of all foreclosures are coming from condo conversions in Nobel Drive area. The ones coming from single family houses are more interesting.
5135 Maynard St: purchased for $455,000 in 2000; estimated default $683,453
4311 Robbins St: purchased for $275,000 in 1998; estimated default $617,765
5131 Bothe Ave: purchased for $218,000 in 1984; estimated default $628,123
6294 Lakewood St: purchased for $191,700 in 1983; estimated default $798,027November 17, 2007 at 2:23 AM #100481EugeneParticipantLast sale on 10/31/2003 was for $494,621. So, did they borrow another $100K+ on top? Wow! a lot of middle and upper middle class families with negative net worth.
It gets much worse than that. I’ve been researching the situation in 92122 a couple of days ago. It’s basically a big island of denial, stable prices, very few listings, low foreclosure rates, etc.. What caught my attention was the kind of foreclosures they were getting.
2/3 of all foreclosures are coming from condo conversions in Nobel Drive area. The ones coming from single family houses are more interesting.
5135 Maynard St: purchased for $455,000 in 2000; estimated default $683,453
4311 Robbins St: purchased for $275,000 in 1998; estimated default $617,765
5131 Bothe Ave: purchased for $218,000 in 1984; estimated default $628,123
6294 Lakewood St: purchased for $191,700 in 1983; estimated default $798,027 -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.