- This topic has 160 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by [email protected].
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 13, 2008 at 11:08 PM #135654January 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM #135360SD RealtorParticipant
sdhome I understand. I looked up the deal. It was a cash deal for 925k. Then your friend went and opened up a home equity line for 180k right after the purchase of the home.
Doesn’t that seem peculiar?
Anyways I will tell you what, I will dig a little deeper and see the details.
Understand that this is a cash deal… NO LENDER was involved.
*************
So if it is a cash deal why would someone pay more in cash just to get that same cash back?
*************
SD RealtorJanuary 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM #135556SD RealtorParticipantsdhome I understand. I looked up the deal. It was a cash deal for 925k. Then your friend went and opened up a home equity line for 180k right after the purchase of the home.
Doesn’t that seem peculiar?
Anyways I will tell you what, I will dig a little deeper and see the details.
Understand that this is a cash deal… NO LENDER was involved.
*************
So if it is a cash deal why would someone pay more in cash just to get that same cash back?
*************
SD RealtorJanuary 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM #135562SD RealtorParticipantsdhome I understand. I looked up the deal. It was a cash deal for 925k. Then your friend went and opened up a home equity line for 180k right after the purchase of the home.
Doesn’t that seem peculiar?
Anyways I will tell you what, I will dig a little deeper and see the details.
Understand that this is a cash deal… NO LENDER was involved.
*************
So if it is a cash deal why would someone pay more in cash just to get that same cash back?
*************
SD RealtorJanuary 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM #135618SD RealtorParticipantsdhome I understand. I looked up the deal. It was a cash deal for 925k. Then your friend went and opened up a home equity line for 180k right after the purchase of the home.
Doesn’t that seem peculiar?
Anyways I will tell you what, I will dig a little deeper and see the details.
Understand that this is a cash deal… NO LENDER was involved.
*************
So if it is a cash deal why would someone pay more in cash just to get that same cash back?
*************
SD RealtorJanuary 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM #135659SD RealtorParticipantsdhome I understand. I looked up the deal. It was a cash deal for 925k. Then your friend went and opened up a home equity line for 180k right after the purchase of the home.
Doesn’t that seem peculiar?
Anyways I will tell you what, I will dig a little deeper and see the details.
Understand that this is a cash deal… NO LENDER was involved.
*************
So if it is a cash deal why would someone pay more in cash just to get that same cash back?
*************
SD RealtorJanuary 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #135495SD RealtorParticipantSdhome YOU ARE CORRECT!!!
First off let me ask for ketchup with my crow sandwich!!! I am sorry I doubted you. Second off here is how it worked.
The friends of yours did indeed pay cash for this home then they indeed get the 70k rebate. The agent said yes it was peculiar AND that NO THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF THERE WAS A LENDER INVOLVED. However because it was cash the builder did agree to do this. The 70k was listed on the HUD so essentially your clients did get this home for 855k rather then the 925k that is on the tax roll!!!
Any appraisers out in this area may want to note that.
Again everyone should note that this was in cash. What will be interesting now is that I believe your friends are now going to finance the home, to get cash back out. I bet that whoever they finance with will never know of the cash back.
That is walking a fine line man. Anyways you were correct and I am glad I checked the story out to clear things up.
SD Realtor
January 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #135693SD RealtorParticipantSdhome YOU ARE CORRECT!!!
First off let me ask for ketchup with my crow sandwich!!! I am sorry I doubted you. Second off here is how it worked.
The friends of yours did indeed pay cash for this home then they indeed get the 70k rebate. The agent said yes it was peculiar AND that NO THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF THERE WAS A LENDER INVOLVED. However because it was cash the builder did agree to do this. The 70k was listed on the HUD so essentially your clients did get this home for 855k rather then the 925k that is on the tax roll!!!
Any appraisers out in this area may want to note that.
Again everyone should note that this was in cash. What will be interesting now is that I believe your friends are now going to finance the home, to get cash back out. I bet that whoever they finance with will never know of the cash back.
That is walking a fine line man. Anyways you were correct and I am glad I checked the story out to clear things up.
SD Realtor
January 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #135696SD RealtorParticipantSdhome YOU ARE CORRECT!!!
First off let me ask for ketchup with my crow sandwich!!! I am sorry I doubted you. Second off here is how it worked.
The friends of yours did indeed pay cash for this home then they indeed get the 70k rebate. The agent said yes it was peculiar AND that NO THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF THERE WAS A LENDER INVOLVED. However because it was cash the builder did agree to do this. The 70k was listed on the HUD so essentially your clients did get this home for 855k rather then the 925k that is on the tax roll!!!
Any appraisers out in this area may want to note that.
Again everyone should note that this was in cash. What will be interesting now is that I believe your friends are now going to finance the home, to get cash back out. I bet that whoever they finance with will never know of the cash back.
That is walking a fine line man. Anyways you were correct and I am glad I checked the story out to clear things up.
SD Realtor
January 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #135754SD RealtorParticipantSdhome YOU ARE CORRECT!!!
First off let me ask for ketchup with my crow sandwich!!! I am sorry I doubted you. Second off here is how it worked.
The friends of yours did indeed pay cash for this home then they indeed get the 70k rebate. The agent said yes it was peculiar AND that NO THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF THERE WAS A LENDER INVOLVED. However because it was cash the builder did agree to do this. The 70k was listed on the HUD so essentially your clients did get this home for 855k rather then the 925k that is on the tax roll!!!
Any appraisers out in this area may want to note that.
Again everyone should note that this was in cash. What will be interesting now is that I believe your friends are now going to finance the home, to get cash back out. I bet that whoever they finance with will never know of the cash back.
That is walking a fine line man. Anyways you were correct and I am glad I checked the story out to clear things up.
SD Realtor
January 14, 2008 at 10:46 AM #135794SD RealtorParticipantSdhome YOU ARE CORRECT!!!
First off let me ask for ketchup with my crow sandwich!!! I am sorry I doubted you. Second off here is how it worked.
The friends of yours did indeed pay cash for this home then they indeed get the 70k rebate. The agent said yes it was peculiar AND that NO THIS COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF THERE WAS A LENDER INVOLVED. However because it was cash the builder did agree to do this. The 70k was listed on the HUD so essentially your clients did get this home for 855k rather then the 925k that is on the tax roll!!!
Any appraisers out in this area may want to note that.
Again everyone should note that this was in cash. What will be interesting now is that I believe your friends are now going to finance the home, to get cash back out. I bet that whoever they finance with will never know of the cash back.
That is walking a fine line man. Anyways you were correct and I am glad I checked the story out to clear things up.
SD Realtor
January 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM #135510CoronitaParticipantInteresting. I wonder if there are any legal issues about this. Not in the initial purchase, but any subsequent refinancing…..
I mean let's suppose this hypothetical situation.
Let's say I work out a scheme with a seller to a home for $1.5million in cash. Behind the seen i get $500k cash back. Then I subsequently refinance the home. Would it take the initial purchase price of $1.5 million into consideration in the any subsequent appraisal? I mean, perhaps a $500k spread is too large to pull this off, but suppose it's say $200-300k on a home >$1million. Afterall, occasionally, we see a seller with an asking price with a $200k spread, sometimes $300k.
I would also suspect that "friend" after refinancing will then have his/her home reassessed at the lower value after refinancing to reduce the tax burden.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM #135707CoronitaParticipantInteresting. I wonder if there are any legal issues about this. Not in the initial purchase, but any subsequent refinancing…..
I mean let's suppose this hypothetical situation.
Let's say I work out a scheme with a seller to a home for $1.5million in cash. Behind the seen i get $500k cash back. Then I subsequently refinance the home. Would it take the initial purchase price of $1.5 million into consideration in the any subsequent appraisal? I mean, perhaps a $500k spread is too large to pull this off, but suppose it's say $200-300k on a home >$1million. Afterall, occasionally, we see a seller with an asking price with a $200k spread, sometimes $300k.
I would also suspect that "friend" after refinancing will then have his/her home reassessed at the lower value after refinancing to reduce the tax burden.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM #135711CoronitaParticipantInteresting. I wonder if there are any legal issues about this. Not in the initial purchase, but any subsequent refinancing…..
I mean let's suppose this hypothetical situation.
Let's say I work out a scheme with a seller to a home for $1.5million in cash. Behind the seen i get $500k cash back. Then I subsequently refinance the home. Would it take the initial purchase price of $1.5 million into consideration in the any subsequent appraisal? I mean, perhaps a $500k spread is too large to pull this off, but suppose it's say $200-300k on a home >$1million. Afterall, occasionally, we see a seller with an asking price with a $200k spread, sometimes $300k.
I would also suspect that "friend" after refinancing will then have his/her home reassessed at the lower value after refinancing to reduce the tax burden.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 14, 2008 at 11:26 AM #135768CoronitaParticipantInteresting. I wonder if there are any legal issues about this. Not in the initial purchase, but any subsequent refinancing…..
I mean let's suppose this hypothetical situation.
Let's say I work out a scheme with a seller to a home for $1.5million in cash. Behind the seen i get $500k cash back. Then I subsequently refinance the home. Would it take the initial purchase price of $1.5 million into consideration in the any subsequent appraisal? I mean, perhaps a $500k spread is too large to pull this off, but suppose it's say $200-300k on a home >$1million. Afterall, occasionally, we see a seller with an asking price with a $200k spread, sometimes $300k.
I would also suspect that "friend" after refinancing will then have his/her home reassessed at the lower value after refinancing to reduce the tax burden.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.