- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM #303194November 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM #306430aldanteParticipant
Guess the real question is the business reason for taking that kind of risk on an asset that only a month ago was put up for auction for 535k? That is the best way to know what a property is worth right? What it will sell for? Well there were numerous bids on this house in and 535k was the winning bid. Why would they think that suddenly someone would pay 598k one month later…..? That is why it sounds fishy to me. Nothing personal just business.
November 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM #306509aldanteParticipantGuess the real question is the business reason for taking that kind of risk on an asset that only a month ago was put up for auction for 535k? That is the best way to know what a property is worth right? What it will sell for? Well there were numerous bids on this house in and 535k was the winning bid. Why would they think that suddenly someone would pay 598k one month later…..? That is why it sounds fishy to me. Nothing personal just business.
November 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM #306449aldanteParticipantGuess the real question is the business reason for taking that kind of risk on an asset that only a month ago was put up for auction for 535k? That is the best way to know what a property is worth right? What it will sell for? Well there were numerous bids on this house in and 535k was the winning bid. Why would they think that suddenly someone would pay 598k one month later…..? That is why it sounds fishy to me. Nothing personal just business.
November 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM #306416aldanteParticipantGuess the real question is the business reason for taking that kind of risk on an asset that only a month ago was put up for auction for 535k? That is the best way to know what a property is worth right? What it will sell for? Well there were numerous bids on this house in and 535k was the winning bid. Why would they think that suddenly someone would pay 598k one month later…..? That is why it sounds fishy to me. Nothing personal just business.
November 17, 2008 at 4:51 PM #306050aldanteParticipantGuess the real question is the business reason for taking that kind of risk on an asset that only a month ago was put up for auction for 535k? That is the best way to know what a property is worth right? What it will sell for? Well there were numerous bids on this house in and 535k was the winning bid. Why would they think that suddenly someone would pay 598k one month later…..? That is why it sounds fishy to me. Nothing personal just business.
November 17, 2008 at 6:48 PM #306115TheBreezeParticipantLet’s see if this gets flipped in a less-than-arms-length transaction at a much higher price.
November 17, 2008 at 6:48 PM #306481TheBreezeParticipantLet’s see if this gets flipped in a less-than-arms-length transaction at a much higher price.
November 17, 2008 at 6:48 PM #306495TheBreezeParticipantLet’s see if this gets flipped in a less-than-arms-length transaction at a much higher price.
November 17, 2008 at 6:48 PM #306514TheBreezeParticipantLet’s see if this gets flipped in a less-than-arms-length transaction at a much higher price.
November 17, 2008 at 6:48 PM #306574TheBreezeParticipantLet’s see if this gets flipped in a less-than-arms-length transaction at a much higher price.
November 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM #306125SD RealtorParticipantAldante sorry for not getting back to you as I frequently do not have any more free time to follow up on posts….
I think I see your point more clearly which is well intentioned but for this particular case not germain. (hope I spelled that right)…
Think about it, in this case the seller came in with a nice little chunk of change for the downpayment. Now if the seller had intentions of defaulting chances are that they would not come in with thier own cash. Similarly the reworks/bailouts (and don’t get me wrong, I clearly hate them) do impose restrictions on people that are specific to the resale of the home. That is, effectively you are giving up future realized profit from appreciation. Now I do not know the specifics but I think you can see that the bailout will not help this speculator at all. In fact if he does need a bailout because he cannot afford the payments he will be somewhat chained to the home. See what I mean? If the guy came in with no money down then we have a different story.
We will know what it sells for if/when it sells. Remember not all speculators are smart. Also as people look to put cash in different areas due to poor performance and low yields don’t be surprised to see a boob or two purchase a home at trustee sale. I have posted before about people making money by flipping trustee sale homes. If you know your submarket and get a deal you can make very good money. If you don’t or are a novice, chances are you will get burned.
November 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM #306491SD RealtorParticipantAldante sorry for not getting back to you as I frequently do not have any more free time to follow up on posts….
I think I see your point more clearly which is well intentioned but for this particular case not germain. (hope I spelled that right)…
Think about it, in this case the seller came in with a nice little chunk of change for the downpayment. Now if the seller had intentions of defaulting chances are that they would not come in with thier own cash. Similarly the reworks/bailouts (and don’t get me wrong, I clearly hate them) do impose restrictions on people that are specific to the resale of the home. That is, effectively you are giving up future realized profit from appreciation. Now I do not know the specifics but I think you can see that the bailout will not help this speculator at all. In fact if he does need a bailout because he cannot afford the payments he will be somewhat chained to the home. See what I mean? If the guy came in with no money down then we have a different story.
We will know what it sells for if/when it sells. Remember not all speculators are smart. Also as people look to put cash in different areas due to poor performance and low yields don’t be surprised to see a boob or two purchase a home at trustee sale. I have posted before about people making money by flipping trustee sale homes. If you know your submarket and get a deal you can make very good money. If you don’t or are a novice, chances are you will get burned.
November 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM #306505SD RealtorParticipantAldante sorry for not getting back to you as I frequently do not have any more free time to follow up on posts….
I think I see your point more clearly which is well intentioned but for this particular case not germain. (hope I spelled that right)…
Think about it, in this case the seller came in with a nice little chunk of change for the downpayment. Now if the seller had intentions of defaulting chances are that they would not come in with thier own cash. Similarly the reworks/bailouts (and don’t get me wrong, I clearly hate them) do impose restrictions on people that are specific to the resale of the home. That is, effectively you are giving up future realized profit from appreciation. Now I do not know the specifics but I think you can see that the bailout will not help this speculator at all. In fact if he does need a bailout because he cannot afford the payments he will be somewhat chained to the home. See what I mean? If the guy came in with no money down then we have a different story.
We will know what it sells for if/when it sells. Remember not all speculators are smart. Also as people look to put cash in different areas due to poor performance and low yields don’t be surprised to see a boob or two purchase a home at trustee sale. I have posted before about people making money by flipping trustee sale homes. If you know your submarket and get a deal you can make very good money. If you don’t or are a novice, chances are you will get burned.
November 17, 2008 at 6:53 PM #306523SD RealtorParticipantAldante sorry for not getting back to you as I frequently do not have any more free time to follow up on posts….
I think I see your point more clearly which is well intentioned but for this particular case not germain. (hope I spelled that right)…
Think about it, in this case the seller came in with a nice little chunk of change for the downpayment. Now if the seller had intentions of defaulting chances are that they would not come in with thier own cash. Similarly the reworks/bailouts (and don’t get me wrong, I clearly hate them) do impose restrictions on people that are specific to the resale of the home. That is, effectively you are giving up future realized profit from appreciation. Now I do not know the specifics but I think you can see that the bailout will not help this speculator at all. In fact if he does need a bailout because he cannot afford the payments he will be somewhat chained to the home. See what I mean? If the guy came in with no money down then we have a different story.
We will know what it sells for if/when it sells. Remember not all speculators are smart. Also as people look to put cash in different areas due to poor performance and low yields don’t be surprised to see a boob or two purchase a home at trustee sale. I have posted before about people making money by flipping trustee sale homes. If you know your submarket and get a deal you can make very good money. If you don’t or are a novice, chances are you will get burned.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.