- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
Bugs.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM #147298February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM #147566
Bugs
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM #147593Bugs
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM #147601Bugs
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM #147320Bugs
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
February 2, 2008 at 6:19 PM #147670Bugs
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.