Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES!!!
- This topic has 220 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by mike92104.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 22, 2008 at 8:14 PM #274374September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274063equalizerParticipant
From John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274310equalizerParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274317equalizerParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274362equalizerParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274384equalizerParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274184Rich ToscanoKeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274431Rich ToscanoKeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274435Rich ToscanoKeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274480Rich ToscanoKeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274503Rich ToscanoKeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274244stockstradrParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274491stockstradrParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274496stockstradrParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274540stockstradrParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.