Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES!!!
- This topic has 220 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
mike92104.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 22, 2008 at 8:14 PM #274374September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274063
equalizer
ParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274310equalizer
ParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274317equalizer
ParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274362equalizer
ParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 22, 2008 at 9:25 PM #274384equalizer
ParticipantFrom John P. Hussman, Ph.D., mutual fund manager:
An Open Letter to the U.S. Congress Regarding the Current Financial Crisis
In 2006, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis noted “Everyone knows that a policy of bailouts will increase their number.” This week, Congress is being asked to hastily consider a monstrous bailout plan on a scale nearly equivalent to the existing balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners that are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies.
While it is certainly in the public interest to avoid the dislocations that would result from a disorderly failure of highly interconnected financial institutions, there are better ways for public funds to accomplish this, other than by protecting corporate bondholders while homeowners remain in distress. …..
September 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274184Rich Toscano
KeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274431Rich Toscano
KeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274435Rich Toscano
KeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274480Rich Toscano
KeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 10:17 AM #274503Rich Toscano
KeymasterSeptember 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274244stockstradr
ParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274491stockstradr
ParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274496stockstradr
ParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
September 23, 2008 at 11:23 AM #274540stockstradr
ParticipantI also today emailed both senators and also my representative.
I have contempt for any American who complains about poor government but doesn’t voice their opinion and at least try to motivate change
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.