- This topic has 180 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2010 at 4:09 PM #532132March 25, 2010 at 4:18 PM #531201
ybitz
ParticipantI think the situation in San Diego and metro areas might be very different than the rest of California. Anecdotal evidence from a friend of mine in Bakersfield suggests that it’s a buyer’s market out there, where San Diego is anything but.
March 25, 2010 at 4:18 PM #531329ParticipantI think the situation in San Diego and metro areas might be very different than the rest of California. Anecdotal evidence from a friend of mine in Bakersfield suggests that it’s a buyer’s market out there, where San Diego is anything but.
March 25, 2010 at 4:18 PM #531780ParticipantI think the situation in San Diego and metro areas might be very different than the rest of California. Anecdotal evidence from a friend of mine in Bakersfield suggests that it’s a buyer’s market out there, where San Diego is anything but.
March 25, 2010 at 4:18 PM #531878ParticipantI think the situation in San Diego and metro areas might be very different than the rest of California. Anecdotal evidence from a friend of mine in Bakersfield suggests that it’s a buyer’s market out there, where San Diego is anything but.
March 25, 2010 at 4:18 PM #532137ParticipantI think the situation in San Diego and metro areas might be very different than the rest of California. Anecdotal evidence from a friend of mine in Bakersfield suggests that it’s a buyer’s market out there, where San Diego is anything but.
March 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM #531241treehugger
Participanthttp://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/25/1872795/schwarzenegger-signs-homebuyer.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_183&sess=CUR&house=B&author=caballero
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0151-0200/ab_183_bill_20100322_enrolled.pdf
I don’t see anything regarding income limits.
March 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM #531369Participanthttp://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/25/1872795/schwarzenegger-signs-homebuyer.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_183&sess=CUR&house=B&author=caballero
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0151-0200/ab_183_bill_20100322_enrolled.pdf
I don’t see anything regarding income limits.
March 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM #531819Participanthttp://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/25/1872795/schwarzenegger-signs-homebuyer.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_183&sess=CUR&house=B&author=caballero
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0151-0200/ab_183_bill_20100322_enrolled.pdf
I don’t see anything regarding income limits.
March 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM #531918Participanthttp://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/25/1872795/schwarzenegger-signs-homebuyer.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_183&sess=CUR&house=B&author=caballero
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0151-0200/ab_183_bill_20100322_enrolled.pdf
I don’t see anything regarding income limits.
March 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM #532177Participanthttp://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/25/1872795/schwarzenegger-signs-homebuyer.html
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_183&sess=CUR&house=B&author=caballero
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0151-0200/ab_183_bill_20100322_enrolled.pdf
I don’t see anything regarding income limits.
March 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM #531281paranoid
Participant” I like the Feds they just hand the $8000 back to you, California makes it sound good, but it is ONLY a credit, if you don’t owe the state above $3300 you only get a credit for what you owe. Meaning my understanding if I owe $300 I do NOT get a rebate of $3000. I only get a credit towards the $300. ”
Is this true that we must reduce our withholding in order to owe the government more than $10000/3, so that we can get the credit? That would be really unfair for people who withholding less such that they effectively lend the government some money for free, and now they don’t get the credit because of their well-doing?
March 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM #531409Participant” I like the Feds they just hand the $8000 back to you, California makes it sound good, but it is ONLY a credit, if you don’t owe the state above $3300 you only get a credit for what you owe. Meaning my understanding if I owe $300 I do NOT get a rebate of $3000. I only get a credit towards the $300. ”
Is this true that we must reduce our withholding in order to owe the government more than $10000/3, so that we can get the credit? That would be really unfair for people who withholding less such that they effectively lend the government some money for free, and now they don’t get the credit because of their well-doing?
March 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM #531859Participant” I like the Feds they just hand the $8000 back to you, California makes it sound good, but it is ONLY a credit, if you don’t owe the state above $3300 you only get a credit for what you owe. Meaning my understanding if I owe $300 I do NOT get a rebate of $3000. I only get a credit towards the $300. ”
Is this true that we must reduce our withholding in order to owe the government more than $10000/3, so that we can get the credit? That would be really unfair for people who withholding less such that they effectively lend the government some money for free, and now they don’t get the credit because of their well-doing?
March 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM #531958Participant” I like the Feds they just hand the $8000 back to you, California makes it sound good, but it is ONLY a credit, if you don’t owe the state above $3300 you only get a credit for what you owe. Meaning my understanding if I owe $300 I do NOT get a rebate of $3000. I only get a credit towards the $300. ”
Is this true that we must reduce our withholding in order to owe the government more than $10000/3, so that we can get the credit? That would be really unfair for people who withholding less such that they effectively lend the government some money for free, and now they don’t get the credit because of their well-doing?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
