- This topic has 105 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM #420706June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #419989SD RealtorParticipant
I have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420221SD RealtorParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420491SD RealtorParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420558SD RealtorParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420720SD RealtorParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #419999Effective DemandParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420231Effective DemandParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420501Effective DemandParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420568Effective DemandParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420730Effective DemandParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420342CA renterParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420574CA renterParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420844CA renterParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420912CA renterParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.