- This topic has 105 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2009 at 10:11 PM #420706June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #419989
SD Realtor
ParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420221SD Realtor
ParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420491SD Realtor
ParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420558SD Realtor
ParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM #420720SD Realtor
ParticipantI have seen the same thing sdr. In fact I am in that same conversation right now with USAA and with Wells Fargo Home Equity on two seperate listings as they are the second lien holder for each of them.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #419999Effective Demand
ParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420231Effective Demand
ParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420501Effective Demand
ParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420568Effective Demand
ParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 24, 2009 at 11:38 PM #420730Effective Demand
ParticipantMaybe they are reporting it as “other” for some reason?
Or possibly it is a new leaf by the lenders and will be reported in the next servicer survey. This only covers up to Q1 2009.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420342CA renter
ParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420574CA renter
ParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420844CA renter
ParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
June 25, 2009 at 5:57 PM #420912CA renter
ParticipantThis is definitely a principal reduction, and one would think that this would eliminate the availability of second mortgages and 80/20 loans as we go forward.
We have seen a definite reduction in loan availability in these second mortgages, but it seems like some lenders are still willing to lend over 80%.
I’d love to see 20-30% down payment requirements on all mortgages. Maybe someday the govt will get out of the mortgage business and we can see what **real** mortgage rates and terms look like.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
