- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM #365139March 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM #364715blahblahblahParticipant
a state with the most people will have more job loss (or job gain) than a state with less people. It’s not shocking.
Actually unemployment is presented in percentage, so population size doesn’t really figure into it. Several states with huge populations are doing a lot better than CA (TX, NY, FL). Also, why would Rhode Island (a tiny state in both area and population) have such high unemployment if it’s dependent on size? I’m not sure what really explains the higher rate in CA — higher cost of living and doing business maybe? Businesses especially have such high taxes here than when times get tough they have to let people go.
March 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM #365196blahblahblahParticipanta state with the most people will have more job loss (or job gain) than a state with less people. It’s not shocking.
Actually unemployment is presented in percentage, so population size doesn’t really figure into it. Several states with huge populations are doing a lot better than CA (TX, NY, FL). Also, why would Rhode Island (a tiny state in both area and population) have such high unemployment if it’s dependent on size? I’m not sure what really explains the higher rate in CA — higher cost of living and doing business maybe? Businesses especially have such high taxes here than when times get tough they have to let people go.
March 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM #365307blahblahblahParticipanta state with the most people will have more job loss (or job gain) than a state with less people. It’s not shocking.
Actually unemployment is presented in percentage, so population size doesn’t really figure into it. Several states with huge populations are doing a lot better than CA (TX, NY, FL). Also, why would Rhode Island (a tiny state in both area and population) have such high unemployment if it’s dependent on size? I’m not sure what really explains the higher rate in CA — higher cost of living and doing business maybe? Businesses especially have such high taxes here than when times get tough they have to let people go.
March 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM #365159blahblahblahParticipanta state with the most people will have more job loss (or job gain) than a state with less people. It’s not shocking.
Actually unemployment is presented in percentage, so population size doesn’t really figure into it. Several states with huge populations are doing a lot better than CA (TX, NY, FL). Also, why would Rhode Island (a tiny state in both area and population) have such high unemployment if it’s dependent on size? I’m not sure what really explains the higher rate in CA — higher cost of living and doing business maybe? Businesses especially have such high taxes here than when times get tough they have to let people go.
March 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM #365001blahblahblahParticipanta state with the most people will have more job loss (or job gain) than a state with less people. It’s not shocking.
Actually unemployment is presented in percentage, so population size doesn’t really figure into it. Several states with huge populations are doing a lot better than CA (TX, NY, FL). Also, why would Rhode Island (a tiny state in both area and population) have such high unemployment if it’s dependent on size? I’m not sure what really explains the higher rate in CA — higher cost of living and doing business maybe? Businesses especially have such high taxes here than when times get tough they have to let people go.
March 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM #365169DWCAPParticipantId guess that construction and RE related industries are bigger here than in many other states. The bubble was in CA moreso than just about any other state, and the industries that supported it will have to suffer more here in CA than just about any other state.
March 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM #365317DWCAPParticipantId guess that construction and RE related industries are bigger here than in many other states. The bubble was in CA moreso than just about any other state, and the industries that supported it will have to suffer more here in CA than just about any other state.
March 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM #365011DWCAPParticipantId guess that construction and RE related industries are bigger here than in many other states. The bubble was in CA moreso than just about any other state, and the industries that supported it will have to suffer more here in CA than just about any other state.
March 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM #365206DWCAPParticipantId guess that construction and RE related industries are bigger here than in many other states. The bubble was in CA moreso than just about any other state, and the industries that supported it will have to suffer more here in CA than just about any other state.
March 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM #364725DWCAPParticipantId guess that construction and RE related industries are bigger here than in many other states. The bubble was in CA moreso than just about any other state, and the industries that supported it will have to suffer more here in CA than just about any other state.
March 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM #365322DWCAPParticipantAnybody see Colusa County? 26% unemployment, when it was only 11% in October. WOW!
And whats up with Mono County? 6.8% and it is inland as inland gets. Is that where Mammoth is? Is everyone there just flipping $11 burgers or renting skis?
March 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM #365211DWCAPParticipantAnybody see Colusa County? 26% unemployment, when it was only 11% in October. WOW!
And whats up with Mono County? 6.8% and it is inland as inland gets. Is that where Mammoth is? Is everyone there just flipping $11 burgers or renting skis?
March 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM #365174DWCAPParticipantAnybody see Colusa County? 26% unemployment, when it was only 11% in October. WOW!
And whats up with Mono County? 6.8% and it is inland as inland gets. Is that where Mammoth is? Is everyone there just flipping $11 burgers or renting skis?
March 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM #365016DWCAPParticipantAnybody see Colusa County? 26% unemployment, when it was only 11% in October. WOW!
And whats up with Mono County? 6.8% and it is inland as inland gets. Is that where Mammoth is? Is everyone there just flipping $11 burgers or renting skis?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.