- This topic has 90 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2008 at 7:38 PM #301553November 7, 2008 at 7:52 PM #301633EugeneParticipant
You are referring to *positive* feedback loops. Negative feedback loops attenuate perturbations, positive feedback loops amplify them.
November 7, 2008 at 7:52 PM #301563EugeneParticipantYou are referring to *positive* feedback loops. Negative feedback loops attenuate perturbations, positive feedback loops amplify them.
November 7, 2008 at 7:52 PM #301579EugeneParticipantYou are referring to *positive* feedback loops. Negative feedback loops attenuate perturbations, positive feedback loops amplify them.
November 7, 2008 at 7:52 PM #301555EugeneParticipantYou are referring to *positive* feedback loops. Negative feedback loops attenuate perturbations, positive feedback loops amplify them.
November 7, 2008 at 7:52 PM #301196EugeneParticipantYou are referring to *positive* feedback loops. Negative feedback loops attenuate perturbations, positive feedback loops amplify them.
November 7, 2008 at 8:40 PM #301216EconProfParticipantesmith: You are correct. You must be an engineer.
And apparently Roubini, Mish, and other economists using these terms have hijacked them and are using them incorrectly.
The old term, vicious cycle, has been replaced by the more grandiose conversation-stopper, NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOP. But you are right–it means a self-dampening process, neither good nor bad, positive nor negative.
Kewp, I’ve had the opposite experience, seeing a 90% empty restaurant at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, and a Home Depot with many idle clerks and empty registers. Shows we can’t trust anecdotal evidence (including mine).November 7, 2008 at 8:40 PM #301575EconProfParticipantesmith: You are correct. You must be an engineer.
And apparently Roubini, Mish, and other economists using these terms have hijacked them and are using them incorrectly.
The old term, vicious cycle, has been replaced by the more grandiose conversation-stopper, NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOP. But you are right–it means a self-dampening process, neither good nor bad, positive nor negative.
Kewp, I’ve had the opposite experience, seeing a 90% empty restaurant at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, and a Home Depot with many idle clerks and empty registers. Shows we can’t trust anecdotal evidence (including mine).November 7, 2008 at 8:40 PM #301582EconProfParticipantesmith: You are correct. You must be an engineer.
And apparently Roubini, Mish, and other economists using these terms have hijacked them and are using them incorrectly.
The old term, vicious cycle, has been replaced by the more grandiose conversation-stopper, NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOP. But you are right–it means a self-dampening process, neither good nor bad, positive nor negative.
Kewp, I’ve had the opposite experience, seeing a 90% empty restaurant at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, and a Home Depot with many idle clerks and empty registers. Shows we can’t trust anecdotal evidence (including mine).November 7, 2008 at 8:40 PM #301653EconProfParticipantesmith: You are correct. You must be an engineer.
And apparently Roubini, Mish, and other economists using these terms have hijacked them and are using them incorrectly.
The old term, vicious cycle, has been replaced by the more grandiose conversation-stopper, NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOP. But you are right–it means a self-dampening process, neither good nor bad, positive nor negative.
Kewp, I’ve had the opposite experience, seeing a 90% empty restaurant at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, and a Home Depot with many idle clerks and empty registers. Shows we can’t trust anecdotal evidence (including mine).November 7, 2008 at 8:40 PM #301599EconProfParticipantesmith: You are correct. You must be an engineer.
And apparently Roubini, Mish, and other economists using these terms have hijacked them and are using them incorrectly.
The old term, vicious cycle, has been replaced by the more grandiose conversation-stopper, NEGATIVE FEEDBACK LOOP. But you are right–it means a self-dampening process, neither good nor bad, positive nor negative.
Kewp, I’ve had the opposite experience, seeing a 90% empty restaurant at 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, and a Home Depot with many idle clerks and empty registers. Shows we can’t trust anecdotal evidence (including mine).November 7, 2008 at 8:49 PM #301604EugeneParticipantHa ha. I do have a degree in physics.
November 7, 2008 at 8:49 PM #301580EugeneParticipantHa ha. I do have a degree in physics.
November 7, 2008 at 8:49 PM #301587EugeneParticipantHa ha. I do have a degree in physics.
November 7, 2008 at 8:49 PM #301221EugeneParticipantHa ha. I do have a degree in physics.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.