Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › CA income taxes increasing 2.5%?
- This topic has 200 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by wannabe2077.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 20, 2008 at 9:16 PM #318982December 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM #318501anParticipant
[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
But Breezey, weren’t you the one a couple of months ago a huge proponent of “spreading the wealth” and taxing the Obama’s definition of the “rich”?If I recall, you stated you are within the top 5 percent of the wage earners in the U.S…..It seems to me that CA has found you by the state definition to be “rich”….
Come on, where’s your love here man?..It’s just an incremental 2.5%…You won’t even really notice this if you are the superstar salesman that is within the top 5% of u.s. wage earners.
There are much less fortunate people than you that need those helps… This is all for a good cause….Someone has to help pay for those potholes and that hi-speed train in CA.Welcome to the poop. Take a number….
[/quote]
I wonder if you’ll get a reply. I was thinking the exact same thing you just put down.December 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM #318850anParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
But Breezey, weren’t you the one a couple of months ago a huge proponent of “spreading the wealth” and taxing the Obama’s definition of the “rich”?If I recall, you stated you are within the top 5 percent of the wage earners in the U.S…..It seems to me that CA has found you by the state definition to be “rich”….
Come on, where’s your love here man?..It’s just an incremental 2.5%…You won’t even really notice this if you are the superstar salesman that is within the top 5% of u.s. wage earners.
There are much less fortunate people than you that need those helps… This is all for a good cause….Someone has to help pay for those potholes and that hi-speed train in CA.Welcome to the poop. Take a number….
[/quote]
I wonder if you’ll get a reply. I was thinking the exact same thing you just put down.December 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM #318894anParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
But Breezey, weren’t you the one a couple of months ago a huge proponent of “spreading the wealth” and taxing the Obama’s definition of the “rich”?If I recall, you stated you are within the top 5 percent of the wage earners in the U.S…..It seems to me that CA has found you by the state definition to be “rich”….
Come on, where’s your love here man?..It’s just an incremental 2.5%…You won’t even really notice this if you are the superstar salesman that is within the top 5% of u.s. wage earners.
There are much less fortunate people than you that need those helps… This is all for a good cause….Someone has to help pay for those potholes and that hi-speed train in CA.Welcome to the poop. Take a number….
[/quote]
I wonder if you’ll get a reply. I was thinking the exact same thing you just put down.December 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM #318913anParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
But Breezey, weren’t you the one a couple of months ago a huge proponent of “spreading the wealth” and taxing the Obama’s definition of the “rich”?If I recall, you stated you are within the top 5 percent of the wage earners in the U.S…..It seems to me that CA has found you by the state definition to be “rich”….
Come on, where’s your love here man?..It’s just an incremental 2.5%…You won’t even really notice this if you are the superstar salesman that is within the top 5% of u.s. wage earners.
There are much less fortunate people than you that need those helps… This is all for a good cause….Someone has to help pay for those potholes and that hi-speed train in CA.Welcome to the poop. Take a number….
[/quote]
I wonder if you’ll get a reply. I was thinking the exact same thing you just put down.December 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM #318994anParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]
But Breezey, weren’t you the one a couple of months ago a huge proponent of “spreading the wealth” and taxing the Obama’s definition of the “rich”?If I recall, you stated you are within the top 5 percent of the wage earners in the U.S…..It seems to me that CA has found you by the state definition to be “rich”….
Come on, where’s your love here man?..It’s just an incremental 2.5%…You won’t even really notice this if you are the superstar salesman that is within the top 5% of u.s. wage earners.
There are much less fortunate people than you that need those helps… This is all for a good cause….Someone has to help pay for those potholes and that hi-speed train in CA.Welcome to the poop. Take a number….
[/quote]
I wonder if you’ll get a reply. I was thinking the exact same thing you just put down.December 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM #318511ArrayaParticipantMany people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
December 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM #318860ArrayaParticipantMany people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
December 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM #318905ArrayaParticipantMany people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
December 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM #318923ArrayaParticipantMany people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
December 20, 2008 at 9:36 PM #319004ArrayaParticipantMany people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
December 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM #318516anParticipant[quote=arraya]Many people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
[/quote]
People only see what they want to see. Just like they see “rich” people are a monolith of laziness and selfishness who goes through life w/ a silver spoon in their mouth. That’s why it’s OK to tax “them”. It’s only unfair when “you” are now considered “them”.December 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM #318865anParticipant[quote=arraya]Many people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
[/quote]
People only see what they want to see. Just like they see “rich” people are a monolith of laziness and selfishness who goes through life w/ a silver spoon in their mouth. That’s why it’s OK to tax “them”. It’s only unfair when “you” are now considered “them”.December 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM #318910anParticipant[quote=arraya]Many people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
[/quote]
People only see what they want to see. Just like they see “rich” people are a monolith of laziness and selfishness who goes through life w/ a silver spoon in their mouth. That’s why it’s OK to tax “them”. It’s only unfair when “you” are now considered “them”.December 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM #318928anParticipant[quote=arraya]Many people will be forced to see that the poor are not a monolith of laziness and selfishness when they become poor and others will be demanding they get thrown off a cliff. I will be interesting see the psychology unfold.
[/quote]
People only see what they want to see. Just like they see “rich” people are a monolith of laziness and selfishness who goes through life w/ a silver spoon in their mouth. That’s why it’s OK to tax “them”. It’s only unfair when “you” are now considered “them”. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.