Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Buzzer Beater in San Marcos
- This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 8 months ago by North County Jim.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2007 at 12:38 PM #9089May 15, 2007 at 12:59 PM #52914BugsParticipant
The MLS shows the most recent listing ($775,000 – $850,000) as an expired in 05/01/2007, not as a sale. If it did sell it may take a week before the sale price is posted in the public records databse.
There’s another home, apparently a model match, in escrow on the same street, albeit on the opposite side. It was listed from $759k – $775k, but it doesn’t have the view amenity or the pool.
May 15, 2007 at 1:21 PM #52921SD RealtorParticipantIf it did sell then it must have been a private sale. As Bugs commented this property has been expired; not just once but a few times. North County Jim did you sale they closed a sale because you knew it was pending? I also checked Realist and there is nothing recorded on the record. As Bugs says it may take another day or two. So they either cured the default, (in which case if they did then there would be no comment on the assessor record) or they refinanced (in which there would be a comment on the assessor record) or the home went to auction and was purchased or reconveyed back to the lender (which would also be recorded)
I am puzzled though because I checked the title plant I use and the records there show that the sale date was to be 4/12/07 and that the notice of trustee sale was published 3/26/07.
I guess that they had a private party sale and that they told the lender and somehow got things delayed? I am a bit perplexed.
SD Realtor
May 15, 2007 at 1:45 PM #52928North County JimParticipantThis has been puzzling to me as well. The original NOT listed the sale date as 4/12 but Recontrust’s web site showed an auction date of 5/12. I’m guessing they bought some time from the lender to complete the transaction.
I’m getting the sale info indirectly from the recorded documents index. If you look up the July 2006 buyers, you’ll see a deed transfer on 5/11/07.
May 15, 2007 at 2:10 PM #52935SD RealtorParticipantGot ya Jim… Hmmm a puzzler indeed. I agree with you that they probably bought time with the lender, maybe they had documentation to show the lender that indeed they were in escrow. Again, I can only assume the sale was done outside the MLS because there is no active or pending status for this address, just a bunch of expireds. I am assuming the deed transfered to an individual or married couple as opposed to reconveyance company or the like?
SD Realtor
May 15, 2007 at 2:34 PM #52938North County JimParticipantThe deed transfer was to a man and a woman with the same last name.
Incidentally, they financed with Countrywide.
June 8, 2007 at 9:31 AM #57883North County JimParticipantIt sold for $710,000. After factoring in lack of payments and expenses, I don’t think Countrywide was made whole on the first trust deed.
BTW, we made an offer on this house in January for $680k and never received a counter.
June 8, 2007 at 9:31 AM #57908North County JimParticipantIt sold for $710,000. After factoring in lack of payments and expenses, I don’t think Countrywide was made whole on the first trust deed.
BTW, we made an offer on this house in January for $680k and never received a counter.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.