- This topic has 185 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by SDEngineer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 12, 2009 at 5:36 PM #398124May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM #397466anParticipant
[quote=eyePod]Rent vs Buy for housing is a fundamental measurement which oversimplifies the analysis. If rents, housing prices, job security, economic stability, etc were STATIC it would be a GREAT metric. However, if any of the inputs change significantly then the result changes significantly.[/quote]
Job security, economic stability, etc. affects you, regardless if you rent or buy. So, why does that matter? If you lose your job and you’re renting, you better find a job soon or you’ll be living in a box once your savings run out. Subleasing won’t be looked upon kindly by most landlord. If you lose your job and you own a house, you can theoretically rent out all the rooms, garage, etc. so you can basically live in your house for free until you’re finally back on your feet. This is one of the many reasons why it’s so important to me that I only buy houses that are at least cash flow neutral, even if it’s a primary resident.May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM #397716anParticipant[quote=eyePod]Rent vs Buy for housing is a fundamental measurement which oversimplifies the analysis. If rents, housing prices, job security, economic stability, etc were STATIC it would be a GREAT metric. However, if any of the inputs change significantly then the result changes significantly.[/quote]
Job security, economic stability, etc. affects you, regardless if you rent or buy. So, why does that matter? If you lose your job and you’re renting, you better find a job soon or you’ll be living in a box once your savings run out. Subleasing won’t be looked upon kindly by most landlord. If you lose your job and you own a house, you can theoretically rent out all the rooms, garage, etc. so you can basically live in your house for free until you’re finally back on your feet. This is one of the many reasons why it’s so important to me that I only buy houses that are at least cash flow neutral, even if it’s a primary resident.May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM #397939anParticipant[quote=eyePod]Rent vs Buy for housing is a fundamental measurement which oversimplifies the analysis. If rents, housing prices, job security, economic stability, etc were STATIC it would be a GREAT metric. However, if any of the inputs change significantly then the result changes significantly.[/quote]
Job security, economic stability, etc. affects you, regardless if you rent or buy. So, why does that matter? If you lose your job and you’re renting, you better find a job soon or you’ll be living in a box once your savings run out. Subleasing won’t be looked upon kindly by most landlord. If you lose your job and you own a house, you can theoretically rent out all the rooms, garage, etc. so you can basically live in your house for free until you’re finally back on your feet. This is one of the many reasons why it’s so important to me that I only buy houses that are at least cash flow neutral, even if it’s a primary resident.May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM #397997anParticipant[quote=eyePod]Rent vs Buy for housing is a fundamental measurement which oversimplifies the analysis. If rents, housing prices, job security, economic stability, etc were STATIC it would be a GREAT metric. However, if any of the inputs change significantly then the result changes significantly.[/quote]
Job security, economic stability, etc. affects you, regardless if you rent or buy. So, why does that matter? If you lose your job and you’re renting, you better find a job soon or you’ll be living in a box once your savings run out. Subleasing won’t be looked upon kindly by most landlord. If you lose your job and you own a house, you can theoretically rent out all the rooms, garage, etc. so you can basically live in your house for free until you’re finally back on your feet. This is one of the many reasons why it’s so important to me that I only buy houses that are at least cash flow neutral, even if it’s a primary resident.May 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM #398140anParticipant[quote=eyePod]Rent vs Buy for housing is a fundamental measurement which oversimplifies the analysis. If rents, housing prices, job security, economic stability, etc were STATIC it would be a GREAT metric. However, if any of the inputs change significantly then the result changes significantly.[/quote]
Job security, economic stability, etc. affects you, regardless if you rent or buy. So, why does that matter? If you lose your job and you’re renting, you better find a job soon or you’ll be living in a box once your savings run out. Subleasing won’t be looked upon kindly by most landlord. If you lose your job and you own a house, you can theoretically rent out all the rooms, garage, etc. so you can basically live in your house for free until you’re finally back on your feet. This is one of the many reasons why it’s so important to me that I only buy houses that are at least cash flow neutral, even if it’s a primary resident.May 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM #397471jpinpbParticipantThere was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that.
May 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM #397720jpinpbParticipantThere was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that.
May 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM #397944jpinpbParticipantThere was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that.
May 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM #398002jpinpbParticipantThere was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that.
May 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM #398145jpinpbParticipantThere was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that.
May 12, 2009 at 6:34 PM #397486anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]There was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that. [/quote]
I would think that’s the exception rather than the rule. As a landlord, I would want to have minimum amount of people living at my rental. Subleasing means you’d have to do background check on those other people too. It’s not just about paying rent on time but also what type of people they are and whether they look like those who would destroy your place. Can you picture your landlord’s face if you tell them you want to convert their house into a mini-dorm?May 12, 2009 at 6:34 PM #397735anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]There was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that. [/quote]
I would think that’s the exception rather than the rule. As a landlord, I would want to have minimum amount of people living at my rental. Subleasing means you’d have to do background check on those other people too. It’s not just about paying rent on time but also what type of people they are and whether they look like those who would destroy your place. Can you picture your landlord’s face if you tell them you want to convert their house into a mini-dorm?May 12, 2009 at 6:34 PM #397959anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]There was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that. [/quote]
I would think that’s the exception rather than the rule. As a landlord, I would want to have minimum amount of people living at my rental. Subleasing means you’d have to do background check on those other people too. It’s not just about paying rent on time but also what type of people they are and whether they look like those who would destroy your place. Can you picture your landlord’s face if you tell them you want to convert their house into a mini-dorm?May 12, 2009 at 6:34 PM #398017anParticipant[quote=jpinpb]There was a time I rented a townhouse and for a while I got a roommate later. I indicated I’m responsible for paying the rent and responsible for the property. There was no problem getting a roommate and helped pay the rent. I didn’t have to own to do that. [/quote]
I would think that’s the exception rather than the rule. As a landlord, I would want to have minimum amount of people living at my rental. Subleasing means you’d have to do background check on those other people too. It’s not just about paying rent on time but also what type of people they are and whether they look like those who would destroy your place. Can you picture your landlord’s face if you tell them you want to convert their house into a mini-dorm? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.