- This topic has 135 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 1, 2008 at 12:20 AM #163426March 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM #163070
Anonymous
GuestThanks SDR. If PMI is NOT involved, then things are indeed different. Here is another agent’s thoughts on why short sales can be unproductive for many, but not all.
How different is the short sale process in CA versus other states that had big gains this decade?
March 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM #163377Anonymous
GuestThanks SDR. If PMI is NOT involved, then things are indeed different. Here is another agent’s thoughts on why short sales can be unproductive for many, but not all.
How different is the short sale process in CA versus other states that had big gains this decade?
March 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM #163388Anonymous
GuestThanks SDR. If PMI is NOT involved, then things are indeed different. Here is another agent’s thoughts on why short sales can be unproductive for many, but not all.
How different is the short sale process in CA versus other states that had big gains this decade?
March 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM #163401Anonymous
GuestThanks SDR. If PMI is NOT involved, then things are indeed different. Here is another agent’s thoughts on why short sales can be unproductive for many, but not all.
How different is the short sale process in CA versus other states that had big gains this decade?
March 1, 2008 at 10:23 AM #163483Anonymous
GuestThanks SDR. If PMI is NOT involved, then things are indeed different. Here is another agent’s thoughts on why short sales can be unproductive for many, but not all.
How different is the short sale process in CA versus other states that had big gains this decade?
March 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM #163074JC
ParticipantPatientlywaiting, thanks for pulling up JWM’s post. May I ask an opinion? Would you still think this was the wrong time to buy if one could get something at a 2001 price and it was at an affordability level for a person that they could still save a decent amount? Also, if the 2001 amount was at the current rental amount in that particular area? (I do realize rents could come down in the future).
Also, does anyone know anything about OC Scam’s comment about realtors not getting thier commission on REOs? As I mentioned, I have an awesome realtor and I don’t want this to happen to them. Is this something to address directly with one’s realtor?
Thank you!
March 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM #163382JC
ParticipantPatientlywaiting, thanks for pulling up JWM’s post. May I ask an opinion? Would you still think this was the wrong time to buy if one could get something at a 2001 price and it was at an affordability level for a person that they could still save a decent amount? Also, if the 2001 amount was at the current rental amount in that particular area? (I do realize rents could come down in the future).
Also, does anyone know anything about OC Scam’s comment about realtors not getting thier commission on REOs? As I mentioned, I have an awesome realtor and I don’t want this to happen to them. Is this something to address directly with one’s realtor?
Thank you!
March 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM #163394JC
ParticipantPatientlywaiting, thanks for pulling up JWM’s post. May I ask an opinion? Would you still think this was the wrong time to buy if one could get something at a 2001 price and it was at an affordability level for a person that they could still save a decent amount? Also, if the 2001 amount was at the current rental amount in that particular area? (I do realize rents could come down in the future).
Also, does anyone know anything about OC Scam’s comment about realtors not getting thier commission on REOs? As I mentioned, I have an awesome realtor and I don’t want this to happen to them. Is this something to address directly with one’s realtor?
Thank you!
March 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM #163406JC
ParticipantPatientlywaiting, thanks for pulling up JWM’s post. May I ask an opinion? Would you still think this was the wrong time to buy if one could get something at a 2001 price and it was at an affordability level for a person that they could still save a decent amount? Also, if the 2001 amount was at the current rental amount in that particular area? (I do realize rents could come down in the future).
Also, does anyone know anything about OC Scam’s comment about realtors not getting thier commission on REOs? As I mentioned, I have an awesome realtor and I don’t want this to happen to them. Is this something to address directly with one’s realtor?
Thank you!
March 1, 2008 at 10:40 AM #163488JC
ParticipantPatientlywaiting, thanks for pulling up JWM’s post. May I ask an opinion? Would you still think this was the wrong time to buy if one could get something at a 2001 price and it was at an affordability level for a person that they could still save a decent amount? Also, if the 2001 amount was at the current rental amount in that particular area? (I do realize rents could come down in the future).
Also, does anyone know anything about OC Scam’s comment about realtors not getting thier commission on REOs? As I mentioned, I have an awesome realtor and I don’t want this to happen to them. Is this something to address directly with one’s realtor?
Thank you!
March 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #163105patientlywaiting
ParticipantJC, I think that temeculaguy said it best on another thread. There is no reason to buy when you see prices dropping every month, even if you can comfortably afford the house.
http://piggington.com/we_are_richer_when_house_prices_go_down?page=2
On his example, if you had bought in Jan 2008 thinking that that the Spring 2008 bounce was about to kick in and that we had reached a bottom, you would have lost $30,000. How long does it take you to save $30,000? Couldn’t you do something better with the money? So why give it to the seller?
Oct 02, 2007 $580,000
Oct 17, 2007 $575,000
Oct 30, 2007 $565,000
Nov 05, 2007 $545,000
Nov 09, 2007 $535,000
Nov 19, 2007 $500,000
Dec 11, 2007 $450,000
Jan 02, 2008 $435,000
Jan 11, 2008 $420,000
Jan 16, 2008 $390,000
Jan 25, 2008 $380,000
Feb 25, 2008 $350,000Watch the macro picture and don’t fixate on specific houses per se. Look at inventory, foreclosures, loan resets, unemployment, the economy, etc….
We are far from bottom. If owning give you psychological satisfaction then buy. Otherwise, buying now (foreclosure or whatever) is catching the falling knife, in my opinion.
March 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #163412patientlywaiting
ParticipantJC, I think that temeculaguy said it best on another thread. There is no reason to buy when you see prices dropping every month, even if you can comfortably afford the house.
http://piggington.com/we_are_richer_when_house_prices_go_down?page=2
On his example, if you had bought in Jan 2008 thinking that that the Spring 2008 bounce was about to kick in and that we had reached a bottom, you would have lost $30,000. How long does it take you to save $30,000? Couldn’t you do something better with the money? So why give it to the seller?
Oct 02, 2007 $580,000
Oct 17, 2007 $575,000
Oct 30, 2007 $565,000
Nov 05, 2007 $545,000
Nov 09, 2007 $535,000
Nov 19, 2007 $500,000
Dec 11, 2007 $450,000
Jan 02, 2008 $435,000
Jan 11, 2008 $420,000
Jan 16, 2008 $390,000
Jan 25, 2008 $380,000
Feb 25, 2008 $350,000Watch the macro picture and don’t fixate on specific houses per se. Look at inventory, foreclosures, loan resets, unemployment, the economy, etc….
We are far from bottom. If owning give you psychological satisfaction then buy. Otherwise, buying now (foreclosure or whatever) is catching the falling knife, in my opinion.
March 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #163424patientlywaiting
ParticipantJC, I think that temeculaguy said it best on another thread. There is no reason to buy when you see prices dropping every month, even if you can comfortably afford the house.
http://piggington.com/we_are_richer_when_house_prices_go_down?page=2
On his example, if you had bought in Jan 2008 thinking that that the Spring 2008 bounce was about to kick in and that we had reached a bottom, you would have lost $30,000. How long does it take you to save $30,000? Couldn’t you do something better with the money? So why give it to the seller?
Oct 02, 2007 $580,000
Oct 17, 2007 $575,000
Oct 30, 2007 $565,000
Nov 05, 2007 $545,000
Nov 09, 2007 $535,000
Nov 19, 2007 $500,000
Dec 11, 2007 $450,000
Jan 02, 2008 $435,000
Jan 11, 2008 $420,000
Jan 16, 2008 $390,000
Jan 25, 2008 $380,000
Feb 25, 2008 $350,000Watch the macro picture and don’t fixate on specific houses per se. Look at inventory, foreclosures, loan resets, unemployment, the economy, etc….
We are far from bottom. If owning give you psychological satisfaction then buy. Otherwise, buying now (foreclosure or whatever) is catching the falling knife, in my opinion.
March 1, 2008 at 1:55 PM #163435patientlywaiting
ParticipantJC, I think that temeculaguy said it best on another thread. There is no reason to buy when you see prices dropping every month, even if you can comfortably afford the house.
http://piggington.com/we_are_richer_when_house_prices_go_down?page=2
On his example, if you had bought in Jan 2008 thinking that that the Spring 2008 bounce was about to kick in and that we had reached a bottom, you would have lost $30,000. How long does it take you to save $30,000? Couldn’t you do something better with the money? So why give it to the seller?
Oct 02, 2007 $580,000
Oct 17, 2007 $575,000
Oct 30, 2007 $565,000
Nov 05, 2007 $545,000
Nov 09, 2007 $535,000
Nov 19, 2007 $500,000
Dec 11, 2007 $450,000
Jan 02, 2008 $435,000
Jan 11, 2008 $420,000
Jan 16, 2008 $390,000
Jan 25, 2008 $380,000
Feb 25, 2008 $350,000Watch the macro picture and don’t fixate on specific houses per se. Look at inventory, foreclosures, loan resets, unemployment, the economy, etc….
We are far from bottom. If owning give you psychological satisfaction then buy. Otherwise, buying now (foreclosure or whatever) is catching the falling knife, in my opinion.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
