Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Buying a property without a real estate agent
- This topic has 65 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 2, 2010 at 4:58 PM #535798April 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM #534854
EconProf
ParticipantNot sure what you are proposing here, with two attorneys. Does that mean one on each side? That works out to two deal killers moving the transaction along. Most attorneys don’t know enough about the intricacies of RE, unless that is all they do.
Real estate agents of course vary widely in quality. To have a good one working only for you is almost always worthwhile. They insert themselves as middlemen in a complicated, lengthy transaction that is filled with landmines. They keep the two warring sides apart in what is essentially a zero-sum game. They move the transaction along and coordinate deadlines, other parties, and necessary paperwork. Good agents earn their money.
BTW, I would not use a friend as an agent–you can’t ream them out if they screw up.April 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM #534984EconProf
ParticipantNot sure what you are proposing here, with two attorneys. Does that mean one on each side? That works out to two deal killers moving the transaction along. Most attorneys don’t know enough about the intricacies of RE, unless that is all they do.
Real estate agents of course vary widely in quality. To have a good one working only for you is almost always worthwhile. They insert themselves as middlemen in a complicated, lengthy transaction that is filled with landmines. They keep the two warring sides apart in what is essentially a zero-sum game. They move the transaction along and coordinate deadlines, other parties, and necessary paperwork. Good agents earn their money.
BTW, I would not use a friend as an agent–you can’t ream them out if they screw up.April 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM #535443EconProf
ParticipantNot sure what you are proposing here, with two attorneys. Does that mean one on each side? That works out to two deal killers moving the transaction along. Most attorneys don’t know enough about the intricacies of RE, unless that is all they do.
Real estate agents of course vary widely in quality. To have a good one working only for you is almost always worthwhile. They insert themselves as middlemen in a complicated, lengthy transaction that is filled with landmines. They keep the two warring sides apart in what is essentially a zero-sum game. They move the transaction along and coordinate deadlines, other parties, and necessary paperwork. Good agents earn their money.
BTW, I would not use a friend as an agent–you can’t ream them out if they screw up.April 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM #535539EconProf
ParticipantNot sure what you are proposing here, with two attorneys. Does that mean one on each side? That works out to two deal killers moving the transaction along. Most attorneys don’t know enough about the intricacies of RE, unless that is all they do.
Real estate agents of course vary widely in quality. To have a good one working only for you is almost always worthwhile. They insert themselves as middlemen in a complicated, lengthy transaction that is filled with landmines. They keep the two warring sides apart in what is essentially a zero-sum game. They move the transaction along and coordinate deadlines, other parties, and necessary paperwork. Good agents earn their money.
BTW, I would not use a friend as an agent–you can’t ream them out if they screw up.April 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM #535802EconProf
ParticipantNot sure what you are proposing here, with two attorneys. Does that mean one on each side? That works out to two deal killers moving the transaction along. Most attorneys don’t know enough about the intricacies of RE, unless that is all they do.
Real estate agents of course vary widely in quality. To have a good one working only for you is almost always worthwhile. They insert themselves as middlemen in a complicated, lengthy transaction that is filled with landmines. They keep the two warring sides apart in what is essentially a zero-sum game. They move the transaction along and coordinate deadlines, other parties, and necessary paperwork. Good agents earn their money.
BTW, I would not use a friend as an agent–you can’t ream them out if they screw up.April 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM #534859DataAgent
Participant“Recently I found a property I think fits me and the price is reasonable.”
So is this property already listed with a realtor?
April 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM #534988DataAgent
Participant“Recently I found a property I think fits me and the price is reasonable.”
So is this property already listed with a realtor?
April 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM #535448DataAgent
Participant“Recently I found a property I think fits me and the price is reasonable.”
So is this property already listed with a realtor?
April 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM #535545DataAgent
Participant“Recently I found a property I think fits me and the price is reasonable.”
So is this property already listed with a realtor?
April 2, 2010 at 5:09 PM #535808DataAgent
Participant“Recently I found a property I think fits me and the price is reasonable.”
So is this property already listed with a realtor?
April 2, 2010 at 5:14 PM #534864briansd1
GuestIt seems to me like the two sides have already worked out price, and all they need to do is complete the transaction.
If that is the case, adding an agent increases the costs and complications for nothing.
You don’t need an attorney. The title company won’t issue a policy if there is a clout on title. And if you’re getting a mortgage, the bank won’t fund the purchase unless there’s title insurance.
April 2, 2010 at 5:14 PM #534993briansd1
GuestIt seems to me like the two sides have already worked out price, and all they need to do is complete the transaction.
If that is the case, adding an agent increases the costs and complications for nothing.
You don’t need an attorney. The title company won’t issue a policy if there is a clout on title. And if you’re getting a mortgage, the bank won’t fund the purchase unless there’s title insurance.
April 2, 2010 at 5:14 PM #535453briansd1
GuestIt seems to me like the two sides have already worked out price, and all they need to do is complete the transaction.
If that is the case, adding an agent increases the costs and complications for nothing.
You don’t need an attorney. The title company won’t issue a policy if there is a clout on title. And if you’re getting a mortgage, the bank won’t fund the purchase unless there’s title insurance.
April 2, 2010 at 5:14 PM #535549briansd1
GuestIt seems to me like the two sides have already worked out price, and all they need to do is complete the transaction.
If that is the case, adding an agent increases the costs and complications for nothing.
You don’t need an attorney. The title company won’t issue a policy if there is a clout on title. And if you’re getting a mortgage, the bank won’t fund the purchase unless there’s title insurance.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.
