- This topic has 170 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by ibjames.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2008 at 1:09 PM #174795March 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #174356pencilneckParticipant
Just a quick comment on a statement made above:
“It took Japan about 16 years to recover from their bubble.”
Real estate prices dropped for nearly 16 years. But to call a cessation of the decline a recovery is a bit of a stretch.
March 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #174702pencilneckParticipantJust a quick comment on a statement made above:
“It took Japan about 16 years to recover from their bubble.”
Real estate prices dropped for nearly 16 years. But to call a cessation of the decline a recovery is a bit of a stretch.
March 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #174708pencilneckParticipantJust a quick comment on a statement made above:
“It took Japan about 16 years to recover from their bubble.”
Real estate prices dropped for nearly 16 years. But to call a cessation of the decline a recovery is a bit of a stretch.
March 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #174720pencilneckParticipantJust a quick comment on a statement made above:
“It took Japan about 16 years to recover from their bubble.”
Real estate prices dropped for nearly 16 years. But to call a cessation of the decline a recovery is a bit of a stretch.
March 21, 2008 at 2:40 PM #174805pencilneckParticipantJust a quick comment on a statement made above:
“It took Japan about 16 years to recover from their bubble.”
Real estate prices dropped for nearly 16 years. But to call a cessation of the decline a recovery is a bit of a stretch.
March 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM #174436NotCrankyParticipant“The influx of REOs definitely drive down the price, but the quality of a lot of REOs is in doubt and some of them might have been severely damaged. Price may be low in these kind of properties but who wants them??”
Me.
Wealth, is in residential real estate in a few places.
Location
The dirt.
Cash flow derived from rents.
Any tax break.
Sweat.
Benefits to future income stream/wealth building IF equity grows and rents go up relative to aquisition and holding costs.
ect.It is not in…
nice cabinets,
Nice paint.
Granite counter tops etc. etc.The prices you say are holding up are doing so to a large degree because of the perceived element of luxury, not value. From an economic point of view,I would be concerned about buying those more than the low priced “undesirable” stuff for the next few years. If you can afford the luxury, go for it.
March 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM #174783NotCrankyParticipant“The influx of REOs definitely drive down the price, but the quality of a lot of REOs is in doubt and some of them might have been severely damaged. Price may be low in these kind of properties but who wants them??”
Me.
Wealth, is in residential real estate in a few places.
Location
The dirt.
Cash flow derived from rents.
Any tax break.
Sweat.
Benefits to future income stream/wealth building IF equity grows and rents go up relative to aquisition and holding costs.
ect.It is not in…
nice cabinets,
Nice paint.
Granite counter tops etc. etc.The prices you say are holding up are doing so to a large degree because of the perceived element of luxury, not value. From an economic point of view,I would be concerned about buying those more than the low priced “undesirable” stuff for the next few years. If you can afford the luxury, go for it.
March 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM #174787NotCrankyParticipant“The influx of REOs definitely drive down the price, but the quality of a lot of REOs is in doubt and some of them might have been severely damaged. Price may be low in these kind of properties but who wants them??”
Me.
Wealth, is in residential real estate in a few places.
Location
The dirt.
Cash flow derived from rents.
Any tax break.
Sweat.
Benefits to future income stream/wealth building IF equity grows and rents go up relative to aquisition and holding costs.
ect.It is not in…
nice cabinets,
Nice paint.
Granite counter tops etc. etc.The prices you say are holding up are doing so to a large degree because of the perceived element of luxury, not value. From an economic point of view,I would be concerned about buying those more than the low priced “undesirable” stuff for the next few years. If you can afford the luxury, go for it.
March 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM #174797NotCrankyParticipant“The influx of REOs definitely drive down the price, but the quality of a lot of REOs is in doubt and some of them might have been severely damaged. Price may be low in these kind of properties but who wants them??”
Me.
Wealth, is in residential real estate in a few places.
Location
The dirt.
Cash flow derived from rents.
Any tax break.
Sweat.
Benefits to future income stream/wealth building IF equity grows and rents go up relative to aquisition and holding costs.
ect.It is not in…
nice cabinets,
Nice paint.
Granite counter tops etc. etc.The prices you say are holding up are doing so to a large degree because of the perceived element of luxury, not value. From an economic point of view,I would be concerned about buying those more than the low priced “undesirable” stuff for the next few years. If you can afford the luxury, go for it.
March 21, 2008 at 4:40 PM #174882NotCrankyParticipant“The influx of REOs definitely drive down the price, but the quality of a lot of REOs is in doubt and some of them might have been severely damaged. Price may be low in these kind of properties but who wants them??”
Me.
Wealth, is in residential real estate in a few places.
Location
The dirt.
Cash flow derived from rents.
Any tax break.
Sweat.
Benefits to future income stream/wealth building IF equity grows and rents go up relative to aquisition and holding costs.
ect.It is not in…
nice cabinets,
Nice paint.
Granite counter tops etc. etc.The prices you say are holding up are doing so to a large degree because of the perceived element of luxury, not value. From an economic point of view,I would be concerned about buying those more than the low priced “undesirable” stuff for the next few years. If you can afford the luxury, go for it.
March 21, 2008 at 6:52 PM #174501jpinpbParticipantFor some reason this is showing up italicized.
doofrat – I have to agree that the loose credit is really the root of this problem and evidenced by what happened once that spigot got shut off. Many people are not qualifying to buy a home. Buyers are out there and there is a demand, but you have to jump through hoops to get it. Only a short time ago, all you had to have was a lemonade or popsicle stand and it was raining free money. That is the difference. That and people buying multiple homes. There wasn’t a “real” shortage/supply. All of it was artificially created.
That said, there are bidding wars happening. This place was initially listed @ 525k. Got so many offers, they raised it to 650k. To be fair, this was the lowest price SFH in PB zoned multi, a couple of blocks from beach.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086021289-862_Sapphire_St_San_Diego_CA_92109
And also DWCAP said something. I certainly can qualify for 300k on my own. I can certainly buy something downtown or Chula Vista or Temecula. Just because I can, doesn’t mean I will. And also agree w/him on the BOM b/c not qualifying.
I also agree w/Rustico. I am not concerned so much w/granite as location. The only qualification I would give is if they are both in the same location, same price (about) and one has granite (improved) naturally pick the place that is fixed.
March 21, 2008 at 6:52 PM #174847jpinpbParticipantFor some reason this is showing up italicized.
doofrat – I have to agree that the loose credit is really the root of this problem and evidenced by what happened once that spigot got shut off. Many people are not qualifying to buy a home. Buyers are out there and there is a demand, but you have to jump through hoops to get it. Only a short time ago, all you had to have was a lemonade or popsicle stand and it was raining free money. That is the difference. That and people buying multiple homes. There wasn’t a “real” shortage/supply. All of it was artificially created.
That said, there are bidding wars happening. This place was initially listed @ 525k. Got so many offers, they raised it to 650k. To be fair, this was the lowest price SFH in PB zoned multi, a couple of blocks from beach.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086021289-862_Sapphire_St_San_Diego_CA_92109
And also DWCAP said something. I certainly can qualify for 300k on my own. I can certainly buy something downtown or Chula Vista or Temecula. Just because I can, doesn’t mean I will. And also agree w/him on the BOM b/c not qualifying.
I also agree w/Rustico. I am not concerned so much w/granite as location. The only qualification I would give is if they are both in the same location, same price (about) and one has granite (improved) naturally pick the place that is fixed.
March 21, 2008 at 6:52 PM #174852jpinpbParticipantFor some reason this is showing up italicized.
doofrat – I have to agree that the loose credit is really the root of this problem and evidenced by what happened once that spigot got shut off. Many people are not qualifying to buy a home. Buyers are out there and there is a demand, but you have to jump through hoops to get it. Only a short time ago, all you had to have was a lemonade or popsicle stand and it was raining free money. That is the difference. That and people buying multiple homes. There wasn’t a “real” shortage/supply. All of it was artificially created.
That said, there are bidding wars happening. This place was initially listed @ 525k. Got so many offers, they raised it to 650k. To be fair, this was the lowest price SFH in PB zoned multi, a couple of blocks from beach.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086021289-862_Sapphire_St_San_Diego_CA_92109
And also DWCAP said something. I certainly can qualify for 300k on my own. I can certainly buy something downtown or Chula Vista or Temecula. Just because I can, doesn’t mean I will. And also agree w/him on the BOM b/c not qualifying.
I also agree w/Rustico. I am not concerned so much w/granite as location. The only qualification I would give is if they are both in the same location, same price (about) and one has granite (improved) naturally pick the place that is fixed.
March 21, 2008 at 6:52 PM #174862jpinpbParticipantFor some reason this is showing up italicized.
doofrat – I have to agree that the loose credit is really the root of this problem and evidenced by what happened once that spigot got shut off. Many people are not qualifying to buy a home. Buyers are out there and there is a demand, but you have to jump through hoops to get it. Only a short time ago, all you had to have was a lemonade or popsicle stand and it was raining free money. That is the difference. That and people buying multiple homes. There wasn’t a “real” shortage/supply. All of it was artificially created.
That said, there are bidding wars happening. This place was initially listed @ 525k. Got so many offers, they raised it to 650k. To be fair, this was the lowest price SFH in PB zoned multi, a couple of blocks from beach.
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-086021289-862_Sapphire_St_San_Diego_CA_92109
And also DWCAP said something. I certainly can qualify for 300k on my own. I can certainly buy something downtown or Chula Vista or Temecula. Just because I can, doesn’t mean I will. And also agree w/him on the BOM b/c not qualifying.
I also agree w/Rustico. I am not concerned so much w/granite as location. The only qualification I would give is if they are both in the same location, same price (about) and one has granite (improved) naturally pick the place that is fixed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.