- This topic has 140 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 24, 2008 at 11:57 PM #261607August 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM #261339gdcoxParticipant
It is not the choice of the banks in a free market to lend non-recourse. It is the law of California.
In most sane countries, mortgages are full recourse and that encourages more sensible borrowing and cuts the size of any house price boom.
It is insane that banks are forced to lend non-recourse on second homes for example : more communist than capitalist.
August 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM #261539gdcoxParticipantIt is not the choice of the banks in a free market to lend non-recourse. It is the law of California.
In most sane countries, mortgages are full recourse and that encourages more sensible borrowing and cuts the size of any house price boom.
It is insane that banks are forced to lend non-recourse on second homes for example : more communist than capitalist.
August 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM #261548gdcoxParticipantIt is not the choice of the banks in a free market to lend non-recourse. It is the law of California.
In most sane countries, mortgages are full recourse and that encourages more sensible borrowing and cuts the size of any house price boom.
It is insane that banks are forced to lend non-recourse on second homes for example : more communist than capitalist.
August 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM #261599gdcoxParticipantIt is not the choice of the banks in a free market to lend non-recourse. It is the law of California.
In most sane countries, mortgages are full recourse and that encourages more sensible borrowing and cuts the size of any house price boom.
It is insane that banks are forced to lend non-recourse on second homes for example : more communist than capitalist.
August 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM #261637gdcoxParticipantIt is not the choice of the banks in a free market to lend non-recourse. It is the law of California.
In most sane countries, mortgages are full recourse and that encourages more sensible borrowing and cuts the size of any house price boom.
It is insane that banks are forced to lend non-recourse on second homes for example : more communist than capitalist.
August 25, 2008 at 7:12 AM #261349MadeInTaiwanParticipantI spoke with a friend who runs a residential branch for Citi over dinner about this. I asked him why wouldn’t someone who is upside down now default on their current house and either move up or buy a similar house at a much lower cost. His response is that the new lender will not close the loan on the new house without you closing w/o short/foreclosure on your current house.
August 25, 2008 at 7:12 AM #261549MadeInTaiwanParticipantI spoke with a friend who runs a residential branch for Citi over dinner about this. I asked him why wouldn’t someone who is upside down now default on their current house and either move up or buy a similar house at a much lower cost. His response is that the new lender will not close the loan on the new house without you closing w/o short/foreclosure on your current house.
August 25, 2008 at 7:12 AM #261558MadeInTaiwanParticipantI spoke with a friend who runs a residential branch for Citi over dinner about this. I asked him why wouldn’t someone who is upside down now default on their current house and either move up or buy a similar house at a much lower cost. His response is that the new lender will not close the loan on the new house without you closing w/o short/foreclosure on your current house.
August 25, 2008 at 7:12 AM #261610MadeInTaiwanParticipantI spoke with a friend who runs a residential branch for Citi over dinner about this. I asked him why wouldn’t someone who is upside down now default on their current house and either move up or buy a similar house at a much lower cost. His response is that the new lender will not close the loan on the new house without you closing w/o short/foreclosure on your current house.
August 25, 2008 at 7:12 AM #261647MadeInTaiwanParticipantI spoke with a friend who runs a residential branch for Citi over dinner about this. I asked him why wouldn’t someone who is upside down now default on their current house and either move up or buy a similar house at a much lower cost. His response is that the new lender will not close the loan on the new house without you closing w/o short/foreclosure on your current house.
August 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM #261354pedroconParticipantIt is not insane to have a non-recourse loan. Again. I repeat in general a collateral loan for a home is normally a very safe investment for the bank, since historically the price of real estate goes up ( tracking inflation ). It is totally reasonable for the home to be sufficient collateral for a home loan. If the current lenders aren’t happy with the arrangement they should get out of the business. Believe me the vacuum will be filled quickly by new lenders. The current condition of the market is atypical.
About the risk premium comment (ucodegen) if interest rates continue to climb then this will force the price of real estate to drop further. With tightening lending standards, high interest rates, and weak income growth comes lower affordability which in the end will cause prices to drop further. Again if we let the market regulate itself in the long run it will probably work better than the gov trying to patch up a sinking ship.
If your are foreclosed on and the lender doesn’t want your business then you rent. If you have strong income (100000+) and sound fundamentals (good down payment)other than your foreclosure and you want to buy a $300000 instead of the $700000 house that you bought in 2005 I have a feeling that there will be lenders out there who will be interested in your business. MONEY TALKS PEOPLE!
August 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM #261555pedroconParticipantIt is not insane to have a non-recourse loan. Again. I repeat in general a collateral loan for a home is normally a very safe investment for the bank, since historically the price of real estate goes up ( tracking inflation ). It is totally reasonable for the home to be sufficient collateral for a home loan. If the current lenders aren’t happy with the arrangement they should get out of the business. Believe me the vacuum will be filled quickly by new lenders. The current condition of the market is atypical.
About the risk premium comment (ucodegen) if interest rates continue to climb then this will force the price of real estate to drop further. With tightening lending standards, high interest rates, and weak income growth comes lower affordability which in the end will cause prices to drop further. Again if we let the market regulate itself in the long run it will probably work better than the gov trying to patch up a sinking ship.
If your are foreclosed on and the lender doesn’t want your business then you rent. If you have strong income (100000+) and sound fundamentals (good down payment)other than your foreclosure and you want to buy a $300000 instead of the $700000 house that you bought in 2005 I have a feeling that there will be lenders out there who will be interested in your business. MONEY TALKS PEOPLE!
August 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM #261563pedroconParticipantIt is not insane to have a non-recourse loan. Again. I repeat in general a collateral loan for a home is normally a very safe investment for the bank, since historically the price of real estate goes up ( tracking inflation ). It is totally reasonable for the home to be sufficient collateral for a home loan. If the current lenders aren’t happy with the arrangement they should get out of the business. Believe me the vacuum will be filled quickly by new lenders. The current condition of the market is atypical.
About the risk premium comment (ucodegen) if interest rates continue to climb then this will force the price of real estate to drop further. With tightening lending standards, high interest rates, and weak income growth comes lower affordability which in the end will cause prices to drop further. Again if we let the market regulate itself in the long run it will probably work better than the gov trying to patch up a sinking ship.
If your are foreclosed on and the lender doesn’t want your business then you rent. If you have strong income (100000+) and sound fundamentals (good down payment)other than your foreclosure and you want to buy a $300000 instead of the $700000 house that you bought in 2005 I have a feeling that there will be lenders out there who will be interested in your business. MONEY TALKS PEOPLE!
August 25, 2008 at 7:31 AM #261615pedroconParticipantIt is not insane to have a non-recourse loan. Again. I repeat in general a collateral loan for a home is normally a very safe investment for the bank, since historically the price of real estate goes up ( tracking inflation ). It is totally reasonable for the home to be sufficient collateral for a home loan. If the current lenders aren’t happy with the arrangement they should get out of the business. Believe me the vacuum will be filled quickly by new lenders. The current condition of the market is atypical.
About the risk premium comment (ucodegen) if interest rates continue to climb then this will force the price of real estate to drop further. With tightening lending standards, high interest rates, and weak income growth comes lower affordability which in the end will cause prices to drop further. Again if we let the market regulate itself in the long run it will probably work better than the gov trying to patch up a sinking ship.
If your are foreclosed on and the lender doesn’t want your business then you rent. If you have strong income (100000+) and sound fundamentals (good down payment)other than your foreclosure and you want to buy a $300000 instead of the $700000 house that you bought in 2005 I have a feeling that there will be lenders out there who will be interested in your business. MONEY TALKS PEOPLE!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.