- This topic has 140 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 3, 2008 at 9:28 PM #180949April 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM #180664
temeculaguy
ParticipantDon’t waste your time, it is marketing in a blog format. I love the article from Feb 4th, calling bottom and claiming some homes have dropped 100k in the last year but only those that were priced incorrectly. I can probably find drops of 100k since Feb 4th when she gave that sage advice, I can certainly find 200k drops all day without trying and have posted 50% drops many times. I’ll take the challenge, heck, I’ll go one handed on a dial up connection.
Some other gems is her analysis of the 100k average sales price difference between murrieta and temecula, her only explanation was that maybe the next month the numbers would be different, HEY, thanks for the analysis. She put up the raw numbers (1800 listings in mur, 50 sales, 1300 listings in tem, 50 sales) but instead of pointing out that a new record of 26 and 36 months of inventory had been reached, she still managed to come to the conclusion that it has hit bottom and it’s a great time to buy! I guess they don’t teach history or economics in the Tarbell realtor training classes.
April 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM #180960ParticipantDon’t waste your time, it is marketing in a blog format. I love the article from Feb 4th, calling bottom and claiming some homes have dropped 100k in the last year but only those that were priced incorrectly. I can probably find drops of 100k since Feb 4th when she gave that sage advice, I can certainly find 200k drops all day without trying and have posted 50% drops many times. I’ll take the challenge, heck, I’ll go one handed on a dial up connection.
Some other gems is her analysis of the 100k average sales price difference between murrieta and temecula, her only explanation was that maybe the next month the numbers would be different, HEY, thanks for the analysis. She put up the raw numbers (1800 listings in mur, 50 sales, 1300 listings in tem, 50 sales) but instead of pointing out that a new record of 26 and 36 months of inventory had been reached, she still managed to come to the conclusion that it has hit bottom and it’s a great time to buy! I guess they don’t teach history or economics in the Tarbell realtor training classes.
April 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM #180962ParticipantDon’t waste your time, it is marketing in a blog format. I love the article from Feb 4th, calling bottom and claiming some homes have dropped 100k in the last year but only those that were priced incorrectly. I can probably find drops of 100k since Feb 4th when she gave that sage advice, I can certainly find 200k drops all day without trying and have posted 50% drops many times. I’ll take the challenge, heck, I’ll go one handed on a dial up connection.
Some other gems is her analysis of the 100k average sales price difference between murrieta and temecula, her only explanation was that maybe the next month the numbers would be different, HEY, thanks for the analysis. She put up the raw numbers (1800 listings in mur, 50 sales, 1300 listings in tem, 50 sales) but instead of pointing out that a new record of 26 and 36 months of inventory had been reached, she still managed to come to the conclusion that it has hit bottom and it’s a great time to buy! I guess they don’t teach history or economics in the Tarbell realtor training classes.
April 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM #180993ParticipantDon’t waste your time, it is marketing in a blog format. I love the article from Feb 4th, calling bottom and claiming some homes have dropped 100k in the last year but only those that were priced incorrectly. I can probably find drops of 100k since Feb 4th when she gave that sage advice, I can certainly find 200k drops all day without trying and have posted 50% drops many times. I’ll take the challenge, heck, I’ll go one handed on a dial up connection.
Some other gems is her analysis of the 100k average sales price difference between murrieta and temecula, her only explanation was that maybe the next month the numbers would be different, HEY, thanks for the analysis. She put up the raw numbers (1800 listings in mur, 50 sales, 1300 listings in tem, 50 sales) but instead of pointing out that a new record of 26 and 36 months of inventory had been reached, she still managed to come to the conclusion that it has hit bottom and it’s a great time to buy! I guess they don’t teach history or economics in the Tarbell realtor training classes.
April 3, 2008 at 11:01 PM #180995ParticipantDon’t waste your time, it is marketing in a blog format. I love the article from Feb 4th, calling bottom and claiming some homes have dropped 100k in the last year but only those that were priced incorrectly. I can probably find drops of 100k since Feb 4th when she gave that sage advice, I can certainly find 200k drops all day without trying and have posted 50% drops many times. I’ll take the challenge, heck, I’ll go one handed on a dial up connection.
Some other gems is her analysis of the 100k average sales price difference between murrieta and temecula, her only explanation was that maybe the next month the numbers would be different, HEY, thanks for the analysis. She put up the raw numbers (1800 listings in mur, 50 sales, 1300 listings in tem, 50 sales) but instead of pointing out that a new record of 26 and 36 months of inventory had been reached, she still managed to come to the conclusion that it has hit bottom and it’s a great time to buy! I guess they don’t teach history or economics in the Tarbell realtor training classes.
April 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM #180744jpinpb
ParticipantMore “tricks.” This person posted:
“Anonymous said…
Thanks for the good story. I live in California and know a neighbor who did exactly what you are reporting about. Only in this case, the wife quit claimed her name off the property. Her income was NOT REQUIRED to buy their house.I have done this before (wife purchases house). My wife has a high FICO, and I make twice the income with almost zero FICO score. Why? I own my own business with NO DEBT, no plastic, lots of savings. FICO scores measure how you pay back DEBT. If you have NO DEBT, you have no FICO. I don’t care about a bad credit report, since I am not a debtor ie no loans no plastic. The lender required us to have both names on the mortgage even though only one of us bought it. Credit scoring is a scam to encourage people to go into debt. We are both savers, and Realtors, mortgage lenders and banks HATE SAVERS—because we don’t give them our hard earned money.
Once the QUITCLAIM document was filed with the County recorder. The husband placed a notice in the newspaper stating he was solely responsible for the mortgage. In the mean time, the wife found a suitably priced house and bought it using only her credit information. ONLY SHE WAS THE BUYER. The husband gets the bad credit (He does not care since he has NO OTHER DEBT and NO CREDIT), the wife buys a new house. It looks perfectly legal to me. Since SHE was the one buying the house, she did not lie. If she wanted her “deadbeat” husband to move in with her thats her problem. LOL ROFL.
They told me the loan company did not care–they had 20% to put down on the house. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY – NOT MORALITY!”
April 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM #181024ParticipantMore “tricks.” This person posted:
“Anonymous said…
Thanks for the good story. I live in California and know a neighbor who did exactly what you are reporting about. Only in this case, the wife quit claimed her name off the property. Her income was NOT REQUIRED to buy their house.I have done this before (wife purchases house). My wife has a high FICO, and I make twice the income with almost zero FICO score. Why? I own my own business with NO DEBT, no plastic, lots of savings. FICO scores measure how you pay back DEBT. If you have NO DEBT, you have no FICO. I don’t care about a bad credit report, since I am not a debtor ie no loans no plastic. The lender required us to have both names on the mortgage even though only one of us bought it. Credit scoring is a scam to encourage people to go into debt. We are both savers, and Realtors, mortgage lenders and banks HATE SAVERS—because we don’t give them our hard earned money.
Once the QUITCLAIM document was filed with the County recorder. The husband placed a notice in the newspaper stating he was solely responsible for the mortgage. In the mean time, the wife found a suitably priced house and bought it using only her credit information. ONLY SHE WAS THE BUYER. The husband gets the bad credit (He does not care since he has NO OTHER DEBT and NO CREDIT), the wife buys a new house. It looks perfectly legal to me. Since SHE was the one buying the house, she did not lie. If she wanted her “deadbeat” husband to move in with her thats her problem. LOL ROFL.
They told me the loan company did not care–they had 20% to put down on the house. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY – NOT MORALITY!”
April 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM #181026ParticipantMore “tricks.” This person posted:
“Anonymous said…
Thanks for the good story. I live in California and know a neighbor who did exactly what you are reporting about. Only in this case, the wife quit claimed her name off the property. Her income was NOT REQUIRED to buy their house.I have done this before (wife purchases house). My wife has a high FICO, and I make twice the income with almost zero FICO score. Why? I own my own business with NO DEBT, no plastic, lots of savings. FICO scores measure how you pay back DEBT. If you have NO DEBT, you have no FICO. I don’t care about a bad credit report, since I am not a debtor ie no loans no plastic. The lender required us to have both names on the mortgage even though only one of us bought it. Credit scoring is a scam to encourage people to go into debt. We are both savers, and Realtors, mortgage lenders and banks HATE SAVERS—because we don’t give them our hard earned money.
Once the QUITCLAIM document was filed with the County recorder. The husband placed a notice in the newspaper stating he was solely responsible for the mortgage. In the mean time, the wife found a suitably priced house and bought it using only her credit information. ONLY SHE WAS THE BUYER. The husband gets the bad credit (He does not care since he has NO OTHER DEBT and NO CREDIT), the wife buys a new house. It looks perfectly legal to me. Since SHE was the one buying the house, she did not lie. If she wanted her “deadbeat” husband to move in with her thats her problem. LOL ROFL.
They told me the loan company did not care–they had 20% to put down on the house. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY – NOT MORALITY!”
April 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM #181058ParticipantMore “tricks.” This person posted:
“Anonymous said…
Thanks for the good story. I live in California and know a neighbor who did exactly what you are reporting about. Only in this case, the wife quit claimed her name off the property. Her income was NOT REQUIRED to buy their house.I have done this before (wife purchases house). My wife has a high FICO, and I make twice the income with almost zero FICO score. Why? I own my own business with NO DEBT, no plastic, lots of savings. FICO scores measure how you pay back DEBT. If you have NO DEBT, you have no FICO. I don’t care about a bad credit report, since I am not a debtor ie no loans no plastic. The lender required us to have both names on the mortgage even though only one of us bought it. Credit scoring is a scam to encourage people to go into debt. We are both savers, and Realtors, mortgage lenders and banks HATE SAVERS—because we don’t give them our hard earned money.
Once the QUITCLAIM document was filed with the County recorder. The husband placed a notice in the newspaper stating he was solely responsible for the mortgage. In the mean time, the wife found a suitably priced house and bought it using only her credit information. ONLY SHE WAS THE BUYER. The husband gets the bad credit (He does not care since he has NO OTHER DEBT and NO CREDIT), the wife buys a new house. It looks perfectly legal to me. Since SHE was the one buying the house, she did not lie. If she wanted her “deadbeat” husband to move in with her thats her problem. LOL ROFL.
They told me the loan company did not care–they had 20% to put down on the house. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY – NOT MORALITY!”
April 4, 2008 at 8:15 AM #181059ParticipantMore “tricks.” This person posted:
“Anonymous said…
Thanks for the good story. I live in California and know a neighbor who did exactly what you are reporting about. Only in this case, the wife quit claimed her name off the property. Her income was NOT REQUIRED to buy their house.I have done this before (wife purchases house). My wife has a high FICO, and I make twice the income with almost zero FICO score. Why? I own my own business with NO DEBT, no plastic, lots of savings. FICO scores measure how you pay back DEBT. If you have NO DEBT, you have no FICO. I don’t care about a bad credit report, since I am not a debtor ie no loans no plastic. The lender required us to have both names on the mortgage even though only one of us bought it. Credit scoring is a scam to encourage people to go into debt. We are both savers, and Realtors, mortgage lenders and banks HATE SAVERS—because we don’t give them our hard earned money.
Once the QUITCLAIM document was filed with the County recorder. The husband placed a notice in the newspaper stating he was solely responsible for the mortgage. In the mean time, the wife found a suitably priced house and bought it using only her credit information. ONLY SHE WAS THE BUYER. The husband gets the bad credit (He does not care since he has NO OTHER DEBT and NO CREDIT), the wife buys a new house. It looks perfectly legal to me. Since SHE was the one buying the house, she did not lie. If she wanted her “deadbeat” husband to move in with her thats her problem. LOL ROFL.
They told me the loan company did not care–they had 20% to put down on the house. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY – NOT MORALITY!”
August 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM #261084Anonymous
GuestHas anyone seen these guys who claim to Stop Foreclosure with 97% success? Loan Resuce Programs is their site. I know until I ran into them I didnt have a clue services like this existed.
August 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM #261284GuestHas anyone seen these guys who claim to Stop Foreclosure with 97% success? Loan Resuce Programs is their site. I know until I ran into them I didnt have a clue services like this existed.
August 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM #261292GuestHas anyone seen these guys who claim to Stop Foreclosure with 97% success? Loan Resuce Programs is their site. I know until I ran into them I didnt have a clue services like this existed.
August 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM #261343GuestHas anyone seen these guys who claim to Stop Foreclosure with 97% success? Loan Resuce Programs is their site. I know until I ran into them I didnt have a clue services like this existed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.