Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › buy & hold rental houses Riverside County?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 96 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 31, 2011 at 11:44 AM #660157
    ltokuda
    Participant

    I’m also thinking about investing in Riverside rental properties. My basic idea would be to buy a fixer-upper in cash. Do some basic improvements, then rent it out. However, I would like to pull equity out of the house as soon as possible so that I can use the money to buy another property.

    Anyone know how soon I could do this after getting a renter moved in? Can you think of any problems I might run into trying to do this?

    January 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM #661323
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    Even scaredycat had a fleeting impulse to buy a rental house because I lost my housing virginity and well, it’s kind of pleasant to pretend I own this house. Fortunately it subsided. I like the idea in theory though. I’m just too scared of bad tenants. Not likePacific heights bad but bad. Remember that old movie with Michael Keaton as the very bad tenant?

    January 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM #660992
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    Even scaredycat had a fleeting impulse to buy a rental house because I lost my housing virginity and well, it’s kind of pleasant to pretend I own this house. Fortunately it subsided. I like the idea in theory though. I’m just too scared of bad tenants. Not likePacific heights bad but bad. Remember that old movie with Michael Keaton as the very bad tenant?

    January 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM #660187
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    Even scaredycat had a fleeting impulse to buy a rental house because I lost my housing virginity and well, it’s kind of pleasant to pretend I own this house. Fortunately it subsided. I like the idea in theory though. I’m just too scared of bad tenants. Not likePacific heights bad but bad. Remember that old movie with Michael Keaton as the very bad tenant?

    January 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM #660854
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    Even scaredycat had a fleeting impulse to buy a rental house because I lost my housing virginity and well, it’s kind of pleasant to pretend I own this house. Fortunately it subsided. I like the idea in theory though. I’m just too scared of bad tenants. Not likePacific heights bad but bad. Remember that old movie with Michael Keaton as the very bad tenant?

    January 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM #660250
    scaredyclassic
    Participant

    Even scaredycat had a fleeting impulse to buy a rental house because I lost my housing virginity and well, it’s kind of pleasant to pretend I own this house. Fortunately it subsided. I like the idea in theory though. I’m just too scared of bad tenants. Not likePacific heights bad but bad. Remember that old movie with Michael Keaton as the very bad tenant?

    January 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM #661478
    paramount
    Participant

    From what I’ve read most commenting on this thread would most likely do better investing in a reit.

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.

    Investment grade generally means multi-family properties.

    January 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM #660406
    paramount
    Participant

    From what I’ve read most commenting on this thread would most likely do better investing in a reit.

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.

    Investment grade generally means multi-family properties.

    January 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM #661009
    paramount
    Participant

    From what I’ve read most commenting on this thread would most likely do better investing in a reit.

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.

    Investment grade generally means multi-family properties.

    January 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM #661148
    paramount
    Participant

    From what I’ve read most commenting on this thread would most likely do better investing in a reit.

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.

    Investment grade generally means multi-family properties.

    January 31, 2011 at 8:55 PM #660342
    paramount
    Participant

    From what I’ve read most commenting on this thread would most likely do better investing in a reit.

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.

    Investment grade generally means multi-family properties.

    January 31, 2011 at 9:15 PM #661158
    zk
    Participant

    [quote=paramount]

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.
    [/quote]

    What do you mean they’d likely end up a liability and why do you think that?

    January 31, 2011 at 9:15 PM #661488
    zk
    Participant

    [quote=paramount]

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.
    [/quote]

    What do you mean they’d likely end up a liability and why do you think that?

    January 31, 2011 at 9:15 PM #661019
    zk
    Participant

    [quote=paramount]

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.
    [/quote]

    What do you mean they’d likely end up a liability and why do you think that?

    January 31, 2011 at 9:15 PM #660352
    zk
    Participant

    [quote=paramount]

    Most of the properties above – sfr’s, one or two condos etc…are not investment grade and most likely will end up a liability.
    [/quote]

    What do you mean they’d likely end up a liability and why do you think that?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 96 total)
1 2 3 … 5 6 7
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.