- This topic has 260 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 5, 2008 at 7:55 PM #281967October 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM #281647TheBreezeParticipant
[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]I’ll add my 2 cents here.
Actually, I’m pretty happy these days. Originally, I was pretty pissed that Obama’s proposed tax law “for the wealthy” would only be screwing my family. It turns out especially with this bailout bill, the impeding crisis in our social security, and state levels, and no clear sign obama is gonna pull out of the war, and Biden’s pledge not to reduce social security retire benefits to the baby boomers, all it means is he and a Democrat congress is gonna end up sticking it to everyone, including all you singles that make $100k +-10k, so relatively, speaking everyone’s going to get shafted. But that’s all that matters, as long as everyone is equally opportunity shafted, I’m no longer gonna complain about this tax on the “wealthy”.
[/quote]
Let’s hope Obama sticks to the plan outlined below. That way, the wealthy would finally have to pay their fair share:
Obama says he would hike several taxes on people making more than $250,000, including the amount they pay on capital gains. Currently, the top income tax rate is 35 percent. Under Obama, that would go back up to 39 percent. Obama’s staff told the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center he would raise the rates for people in the top two brackets — about 2.5 million filers out of 100 million-plus. People in those high tax brackets would see the tax rate on their capital gains hiked from the current 15 percent to 20-28 percent.
Obama started his campaign saying his plans would not increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000. But he found himself in an apparent contradiction by saying he would tax all income to fund Social Security, not just income up to $102,000, as is now the case. So now, Obama’s plan calls for no Social Security tax on income between $102,000 and $250,000, but all income above $250,000 would be taxed for Social Security.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1031268,CST-NWS-tax30.article
Let’s take the tax burden off the honest-to-God, hard-working 95% of Americans who make less than $250,000 (a quarter-million) and put it on the rich bastards who got us into this mess.
October 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM #281925TheBreezeParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]I’ll add my 2 cents here.
Actually, I’m pretty happy these days. Originally, I was pretty pissed that Obama’s proposed tax law “for the wealthy” would only be screwing my family. It turns out especially with this bailout bill, the impeding crisis in our social security, and state levels, and no clear sign obama is gonna pull out of the war, and Biden’s pledge not to reduce social security retire benefits to the baby boomers, all it means is he and a Democrat congress is gonna end up sticking it to everyone, including all you singles that make $100k +-10k, so relatively, speaking everyone’s going to get shafted. But that’s all that matters, as long as everyone is equally opportunity shafted, I’m no longer gonna complain about this tax on the “wealthy”.
[/quote]
Let’s hope Obama sticks to the plan outlined below. That way, the wealthy would finally have to pay their fair share:
Obama says he would hike several taxes on people making more than $250,000, including the amount they pay on capital gains. Currently, the top income tax rate is 35 percent. Under Obama, that would go back up to 39 percent. Obama’s staff told the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center he would raise the rates for people in the top two brackets — about 2.5 million filers out of 100 million-plus. People in those high tax brackets would see the tax rate on their capital gains hiked from the current 15 percent to 20-28 percent.
Obama started his campaign saying his plans would not increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000. But he found himself in an apparent contradiction by saying he would tax all income to fund Social Security, not just income up to $102,000, as is now the case. So now, Obama’s plan calls for no Social Security tax on income between $102,000 and $250,000, but all income above $250,000 would be taxed for Social Security.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1031268,CST-NWS-tax30.article
Let’s take the tax burden off the honest-to-God, hard-working 95% of Americans who make less than $250,000 (a quarter-million) and put it on the rich bastards who got us into this mess.
October 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM #281928TheBreezeParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]I’ll add my 2 cents here.
Actually, I’m pretty happy these days. Originally, I was pretty pissed that Obama’s proposed tax law “for the wealthy” would only be screwing my family. It turns out especially with this bailout bill, the impeding crisis in our social security, and state levels, and no clear sign obama is gonna pull out of the war, and Biden’s pledge not to reduce social security retire benefits to the baby boomers, all it means is he and a Democrat congress is gonna end up sticking it to everyone, including all you singles that make $100k +-10k, so relatively, speaking everyone’s going to get shafted. But that’s all that matters, as long as everyone is equally opportunity shafted, I’m no longer gonna complain about this tax on the “wealthy”.
[/quote]
Let’s hope Obama sticks to the plan outlined below. That way, the wealthy would finally have to pay their fair share:
Obama says he would hike several taxes on people making more than $250,000, including the amount they pay on capital gains. Currently, the top income tax rate is 35 percent. Under Obama, that would go back up to 39 percent. Obama’s staff told the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center he would raise the rates for people in the top two brackets — about 2.5 million filers out of 100 million-plus. People in those high tax brackets would see the tax rate on their capital gains hiked from the current 15 percent to 20-28 percent.
Obama started his campaign saying his plans would not increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000. But he found himself in an apparent contradiction by saying he would tax all income to fund Social Security, not just income up to $102,000, as is now the case. So now, Obama’s plan calls for no Social Security tax on income between $102,000 and $250,000, but all income above $250,000 would be taxed for Social Security.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1031268,CST-NWS-tax30.article
Let’s take the tax burden off the honest-to-God, hard-working 95% of Americans who make less than $250,000 (a quarter-million) and put it on the rich bastards who got us into this mess.
October 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM #281969TheBreezeParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]I’ll add my 2 cents here.
Actually, I’m pretty happy these days. Originally, I was pretty pissed that Obama’s proposed tax law “for the wealthy” would only be screwing my family. It turns out especially with this bailout bill, the impeding crisis in our social security, and state levels, and no clear sign obama is gonna pull out of the war, and Biden’s pledge not to reduce social security retire benefits to the baby boomers, all it means is he and a Democrat congress is gonna end up sticking it to everyone, including all you singles that make $100k +-10k, so relatively, speaking everyone’s going to get shafted. But that’s all that matters, as long as everyone is equally opportunity shafted, I’m no longer gonna complain about this tax on the “wealthy”.
[/quote]
Let’s hope Obama sticks to the plan outlined below. That way, the wealthy would finally have to pay their fair share:
Obama says he would hike several taxes on people making more than $250,000, including the amount they pay on capital gains. Currently, the top income tax rate is 35 percent. Under Obama, that would go back up to 39 percent. Obama’s staff told the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center he would raise the rates for people in the top two brackets — about 2.5 million filers out of 100 million-plus. People in those high tax brackets would see the tax rate on their capital gains hiked from the current 15 percent to 20-28 percent.
Obama started his campaign saying his plans would not increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000. But he found himself in an apparent contradiction by saying he would tax all income to fund Social Security, not just income up to $102,000, as is now the case. So now, Obama’s plan calls for no Social Security tax on income between $102,000 and $250,000, but all income above $250,000 would be taxed for Social Security.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1031268,CST-NWS-tax30.article
Let’s take the tax burden off the honest-to-God, hard-working 95% of Americans who make less than $250,000 (a quarter-million) and put it on the rich bastards who got us into this mess.
October 5, 2008 at 7:59 PM #281982TheBreezeParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]I’ll add my 2 cents here.
Actually, I’m pretty happy these days. Originally, I was pretty pissed that Obama’s proposed tax law “for the wealthy” would only be screwing my family. It turns out especially with this bailout bill, the impeding crisis in our social security, and state levels, and no clear sign obama is gonna pull out of the war, and Biden’s pledge not to reduce social security retire benefits to the baby boomers, all it means is he and a Democrat congress is gonna end up sticking it to everyone, including all you singles that make $100k +-10k, so relatively, speaking everyone’s going to get shafted. But that’s all that matters, as long as everyone is equally opportunity shafted, I’m no longer gonna complain about this tax on the “wealthy”.
[/quote]
Let’s hope Obama sticks to the plan outlined below. That way, the wealthy would finally have to pay their fair share:
Obama says he would hike several taxes on people making more than $250,000, including the amount they pay on capital gains. Currently, the top income tax rate is 35 percent. Under Obama, that would go back up to 39 percent. Obama’s staff told the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center he would raise the rates for people in the top two brackets — about 2.5 million filers out of 100 million-plus. People in those high tax brackets would see the tax rate on their capital gains hiked from the current 15 percent to 20-28 percent.
Obama started his campaign saying his plans would not increase taxes for people earning less than $250,000. But he found himself in an apparent contradiction by saying he would tax all income to fund Social Security, not just income up to $102,000, as is now the case. So now, Obama’s plan calls for no Social Security tax on income between $102,000 and $250,000, but all income above $250,000 would be taxed for Social Security.
The 95 percent-plus of the American population that earns less than $250,000 would see the following tax breaks: A $500-per-worker tax credit for people who earn less than $150,000 and do not itemize, and a $4,000 credit per child in college. Seniors who earn less than $50,000 would pay no income tax.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/1031268,CST-NWS-tax30.article
Let’s take the tax burden off the honest-to-God, hard-working 95% of Americans who make less than $250,000 (a quarter-million) and put it on the rich bastards who got us into this mess.
October 5, 2008 at 8:33 PM #281687larrylujackParticipant[quote=jficquette][quote=gandalf]Enough already.
Not a fan of Clinton-Pelosi-Reid, but at this point in time? Fuck the GOP. Borrow-n-spend fiscal crackpots, flag-pin patriots, religious nutjobs, airport bathroom queers. Republicans are ridiculous. Palin is a prop. McCain has cancer.
I’m ex-GOP, conservative foreign / fiscal policy. Obama is the real thing. Constitutional scholar, pragmatic consensus-builder and old-school responsible. Kill Osama Bin Laden. Re-tool our economy now, get off foreign oil. Enough of the GOP. Voting for Obama / Biden.
[/quote]
Hey Gandalf,
I was wondering when you were going to post again.
Here check this out:
“Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.”
Gandalf, Obama is an Emperor without clothes.
John
[/quote]gee, jfquicke, how do you square McCain’s rather lackluster academic resume per his tenure at the Naval academy and Palin’s rather thin academic creds at a few forgettable schools in Idaho also? I mean, how well academically did your hero McCain do? 5th from the bottom of his class at US Naval Academy?- stellar! And how many colleges did Palin go to and still can’t speak in complete or coherent sentences? Since you obviously fail to apply the same standard to McCain or Palin as you have to Obama (that is, one can be less than stellar academically and still succeed) , the only explanation is that you are a typical racist. I mean really, if Obama were a repub, like Allan Keyes, you’d be spoutin his University of Chicago and Harvard credentials to no end.
But, then again the party you admire has done such a fabulously good job of governance recently, such that you have to resort to race baiting and smears- as we will soon see more of. No doubt the repubs fit your values. It is too bad you you can not recognize your clear hatred of people of color so much that your thought process (to put it charitably) is so warped. I pity you.
October 5, 2008 at 8:33 PM #281965larrylujackParticipant[quote=jficquette][quote=gandalf]Enough already.
Not a fan of Clinton-Pelosi-Reid, but at this point in time? Fuck the GOP. Borrow-n-spend fiscal crackpots, flag-pin patriots, religious nutjobs, airport bathroom queers. Republicans are ridiculous. Palin is a prop. McCain has cancer.
I’m ex-GOP, conservative foreign / fiscal policy. Obama is the real thing. Constitutional scholar, pragmatic consensus-builder and old-school responsible. Kill Osama Bin Laden. Re-tool our economy now, get off foreign oil. Enough of the GOP. Voting for Obama / Biden.
[/quote]
Hey Gandalf,
I was wondering when you were going to post again.
Here check this out:
“Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.”
Gandalf, Obama is an Emperor without clothes.
John
[/quote]gee, jfquicke, how do you square McCain’s rather lackluster academic resume per his tenure at the Naval academy and Palin’s rather thin academic creds at a few forgettable schools in Idaho also? I mean, how well academically did your hero McCain do? 5th from the bottom of his class at US Naval Academy?- stellar! And how many colleges did Palin go to and still can’t speak in complete or coherent sentences? Since you obviously fail to apply the same standard to McCain or Palin as you have to Obama (that is, one can be less than stellar academically and still succeed) , the only explanation is that you are a typical racist. I mean really, if Obama were a repub, like Allan Keyes, you’d be spoutin his University of Chicago and Harvard credentials to no end.
But, then again the party you admire has done such a fabulously good job of governance recently, such that you have to resort to race baiting and smears- as we will soon see more of. No doubt the repubs fit your values. It is too bad you you can not recognize your clear hatred of people of color so much that your thought process (to put it charitably) is so warped. I pity you.
October 5, 2008 at 8:33 PM #281968larrylujackParticipant[quote=jficquette][quote=gandalf]Enough already.
Not a fan of Clinton-Pelosi-Reid, but at this point in time? Fuck the GOP. Borrow-n-spend fiscal crackpots, flag-pin patriots, religious nutjobs, airport bathroom queers. Republicans are ridiculous. Palin is a prop. McCain has cancer.
I’m ex-GOP, conservative foreign / fiscal policy. Obama is the real thing. Constitutional scholar, pragmatic consensus-builder and old-school responsible. Kill Osama Bin Laden. Re-tool our economy now, get off foreign oil. Enough of the GOP. Voting for Obama / Biden.
[/quote]
Hey Gandalf,
I was wondering when you were going to post again.
Here check this out:
“Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.”
Gandalf, Obama is an Emperor without clothes.
John
[/quote]gee, jfquicke, how do you square McCain’s rather lackluster academic resume per his tenure at the Naval academy and Palin’s rather thin academic creds at a few forgettable schools in Idaho also? I mean, how well academically did your hero McCain do? 5th from the bottom of his class at US Naval Academy?- stellar! And how many colleges did Palin go to and still can’t speak in complete or coherent sentences? Since you obviously fail to apply the same standard to McCain or Palin as you have to Obama (that is, one can be less than stellar academically and still succeed) , the only explanation is that you are a typical racist. I mean really, if Obama were a repub, like Allan Keyes, you’d be spoutin his University of Chicago and Harvard credentials to no end.
But, then again the party you admire has done such a fabulously good job of governance recently, such that you have to resort to race baiting and smears- as we will soon see more of. No doubt the repubs fit your values. It is too bad you you can not recognize your clear hatred of people of color so much that your thought process (to put it charitably) is so warped. I pity you.
October 5, 2008 at 8:33 PM #282009larrylujackParticipant[quote=jficquette][quote=gandalf]Enough already.
Not a fan of Clinton-Pelosi-Reid, but at this point in time? Fuck the GOP. Borrow-n-spend fiscal crackpots, flag-pin patriots, religious nutjobs, airport bathroom queers. Republicans are ridiculous. Palin is a prop. McCain has cancer.
I’m ex-GOP, conservative foreign / fiscal policy. Obama is the real thing. Constitutional scholar, pragmatic consensus-builder and old-school responsible. Kill Osama Bin Laden. Re-tool our economy now, get off foreign oil. Enough of the GOP. Voting for Obama / Biden.
[/quote]
Hey Gandalf,
I was wondering when you were going to post again.
Here check this out:
“Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.”
Gandalf, Obama is an Emperor without clothes.
John
[/quote]gee, jfquicke, how do you square McCain’s rather lackluster academic resume per his tenure at the Naval academy and Palin’s rather thin academic creds at a few forgettable schools in Idaho also? I mean, how well academically did your hero McCain do? 5th from the bottom of his class at US Naval Academy?- stellar! And how many colleges did Palin go to and still can’t speak in complete or coherent sentences? Since you obviously fail to apply the same standard to McCain or Palin as you have to Obama (that is, one can be less than stellar academically and still succeed) , the only explanation is that you are a typical racist. I mean really, if Obama were a repub, like Allan Keyes, you’d be spoutin his University of Chicago and Harvard credentials to no end.
But, then again the party you admire has done such a fabulously good job of governance recently, such that you have to resort to race baiting and smears- as we will soon see more of. No doubt the repubs fit your values. It is too bad you you can not recognize your clear hatred of people of color so much that your thought process (to put it charitably) is so warped. I pity you.
October 5, 2008 at 8:33 PM #282022larrylujackParticipant[quote=jficquette][quote=gandalf]Enough already.
Not a fan of Clinton-Pelosi-Reid, but at this point in time? Fuck the GOP. Borrow-n-spend fiscal crackpots, flag-pin patriots, religious nutjobs, airport bathroom queers. Republicans are ridiculous. Palin is a prop. McCain has cancer.
I’m ex-GOP, conservative foreign / fiscal policy. Obama is the real thing. Constitutional scholar, pragmatic consensus-builder and old-school responsible. Kill Osama Bin Laden. Re-tool our economy now, get off foreign oil. Enough of the GOP. Voting for Obama / Biden.
[/quote]
Hey Gandalf,
I was wondering when you were going to post again.
Here check this out:
“Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.”
Gandalf, Obama is an Emperor without clothes.
John
[/quote]gee, jfquicke, how do you square McCain’s rather lackluster academic resume per his tenure at the Naval academy and Palin’s rather thin academic creds at a few forgettable schools in Idaho also? I mean, how well academically did your hero McCain do? 5th from the bottom of his class at US Naval Academy?- stellar! And how many colleges did Palin go to and still can’t speak in complete or coherent sentences? Since you obviously fail to apply the same standard to McCain or Palin as you have to Obama (that is, one can be less than stellar academically and still succeed) , the only explanation is that you are a typical racist. I mean really, if Obama were a repub, like Allan Keyes, you’d be spoutin his University of Chicago and Harvard credentials to no end.
But, then again the party you admire has done such a fabulously good job of governance recently, such that you have to resort to race baiting and smears- as we will soon see more of. No doubt the repubs fit your values. It is too bad you you can not recognize your clear hatred of people of color so much that your thought process (to put it charitably) is so warped. I pity you.
October 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM #281946DukehornParticipantDoh,
Some idiot forgot to mention that Obama did graduate magna cum lauda from Harvard Law. Not the easiest thing to do. My friend who teaches at Thomas Jefferson Law School certainly didn’t attain that when he was at Harvard Law.
And Palin has to be thanking her particular creationist beliefs that there’s no “pesky” intellectual issues like “follow up” questions in a debate. I mean when I give an opinion on a Supreme Court case that I’ve never read I certainly don’t expect a judge to ask follow up questions. The temerity of it all!!!
Let’s try again: “Governor Palin, you mention that you oppose certain Supreme Court decisions, can you please elaborate”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsvJBgQp3V4
Bravo Governor Palin Bravo!!
Now go back to your family values (oh wait…..).
As for you software techies that worry about the economy, guess there’s no sympathy that the biotech industry is getting shafted by the conservatives, eh?? Nice….
October 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM #282224DukehornParticipantDoh,
Some idiot forgot to mention that Obama did graduate magna cum lauda from Harvard Law. Not the easiest thing to do. My friend who teaches at Thomas Jefferson Law School certainly didn’t attain that when he was at Harvard Law.
And Palin has to be thanking her particular creationist beliefs that there’s no “pesky” intellectual issues like “follow up” questions in a debate. I mean when I give an opinion on a Supreme Court case that I’ve never read I certainly don’t expect a judge to ask follow up questions. The temerity of it all!!!
Let’s try again: “Governor Palin, you mention that you oppose certain Supreme Court decisions, can you please elaborate”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsvJBgQp3V4
Bravo Governor Palin Bravo!!
Now go back to your family values (oh wait…..).
As for you software techies that worry about the economy, guess there’s no sympathy that the biotech industry is getting shafted by the conservatives, eh?? Nice….
October 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM #282228DukehornParticipantDoh,
Some idiot forgot to mention that Obama did graduate magna cum lauda from Harvard Law. Not the easiest thing to do. My friend who teaches at Thomas Jefferson Law School certainly didn’t attain that when he was at Harvard Law.
And Palin has to be thanking her particular creationist beliefs that there’s no “pesky” intellectual issues like “follow up” questions in a debate. I mean when I give an opinion on a Supreme Court case that I’ve never read I certainly don’t expect a judge to ask follow up questions. The temerity of it all!!!
Let’s try again: “Governor Palin, you mention that you oppose certain Supreme Court decisions, can you please elaborate”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsvJBgQp3V4
Bravo Governor Palin Bravo!!
Now go back to your family values (oh wait…..).
As for you software techies that worry about the economy, guess there’s no sympathy that the biotech industry is getting shafted by the conservatives, eh?? Nice….
October 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM #282269DukehornParticipantDoh,
Some idiot forgot to mention that Obama did graduate magna cum lauda from Harvard Law. Not the easiest thing to do. My friend who teaches at Thomas Jefferson Law School certainly didn’t attain that when he was at Harvard Law.
And Palin has to be thanking her particular creationist beliefs that there’s no “pesky” intellectual issues like “follow up” questions in a debate. I mean when I give an opinion on a Supreme Court case that I’ve never read I certainly don’t expect a judge to ask follow up questions. The temerity of it all!!!
Let’s try again: “Governor Palin, you mention that you oppose certain Supreme Court decisions, can you please elaborate”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsvJBgQp3V4
Bravo Governor Palin Bravo!!
Now go back to your family values (oh wait…..).
As for you software techies that worry about the economy, guess there’s no sympathy that the biotech industry is getting shafted by the conservatives, eh?? Nice….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.