- This topic has 605 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 17, 2009 at 9:10 AM #330976January 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM #330463TheBreezeParticipant
[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
I can think of all sorts of valid reasons for OCR not to broadcast his identity and his address on his very popular blog.
Have any of the Pigg posters broadcast their address? None that I can recall. Heck, even though I’m beloved by practically every one here, it’s likely that even I will decide to keep my ID and address private when/if I decide to buy.
January 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM #330799TheBreezeParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
I can think of all sorts of valid reasons for OCR not to broadcast his identity and his address on his very popular blog.
Have any of the Pigg posters broadcast their address? None that I can recall. Heck, even though I’m beloved by practically every one here, it’s likely that even I will decide to keep my ID and address private when/if I decide to buy.
January 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM #330875TheBreezeParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
I can think of all sorts of valid reasons for OCR not to broadcast his identity and his address on his very popular blog.
Have any of the Pigg posters broadcast their address? None that I can recall. Heck, even though I’m beloved by practically every one here, it’s likely that even I will decide to keep my ID and address private when/if I decide to buy.
January 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM #330902TheBreezeParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
I can think of all sorts of valid reasons for OCR not to broadcast his identity and his address on his very popular blog.
Have any of the Pigg posters broadcast their address? None that I can recall. Heck, even though I’m beloved by practically every one here, it’s likely that even I will decide to keep my ID and address private when/if I decide to buy.
January 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM #330986TheBreezeParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
I can think of all sorts of valid reasons for OCR not to broadcast his identity and his address on his very popular blog.
Have any of the Pigg posters broadcast their address? None that I can recall. Heck, even though I’m beloved by practically every one here, it’s likely that even I will decide to keep my ID and address private when/if I decide to buy.
January 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM #330508zkParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
T4L,
Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.
So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.
January 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM #330844zkParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
T4L,
Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.
So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.
January 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM #330921zkParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
T4L,
Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.
So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.
January 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM #330947zkParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
T4L,
Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.
So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.
January 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM #331031zkParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
T4L,
Anybody can sue anybody. Whether they have legitimate grounds or not. If OCR gets sued, he’s got to defend himself, and that costs money. Whether he ends up winning the case or not. To answer the questions people have been asking you about why you’re questioning OCR’s ethics with, “he’s afraid of getting sued, therefore he must have done something wrong” is to not answer the questions at all.
So you still haven’t answered the questions. And now you look like someone who’s attacked someone else’s integrity without cause. If that bothers you, perhaps you should answer the questions.
January 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM #330513patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
Responding to a lawsuit (even a frivolous one) is costly and time consuming and a big hassle.
Implode-o-meter was sued by a mortgage company that lost financing allegedly because of leaks on implode-o-meter about their financial health.
The suit was thrown out but but Aaron Krowne had to spend thousands to defend himself. Then he had to incorporate to protect himself.
OCR has no obligation to post his address or defend his purchase.
I see OCR as someone who chronicles the housing bubble as a pass-time on his blog. Just because he ridicules knife catchers, doesn’t preclude him from being one himself.
His speech is protected speech. If you don’t like it, don’t read it.
One good reason to remain anonymous is if you can’t be served, then you can’t be sued.
January 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM #330850patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
Responding to a lawsuit (even a frivolous one) is costly and time consuming and a big hassle.
Implode-o-meter was sued by a mortgage company that lost financing allegedly because of leaks on implode-o-meter about their financial health.
The suit was thrown out but but Aaron Krowne had to spend thousands to defend himself. Then he had to incorporate to protect himself.
OCR has no obligation to post his address or defend his purchase.
I see OCR as someone who chronicles the housing bubble as a pass-time on his blog. Just because he ridicules knife catchers, doesn’t preclude him from being one himself.
His speech is protected speech. If you don’t like it, don’t read it.
One good reason to remain anonymous is if you can’t be served, then you can’t be sued.
January 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM #330926patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
Responding to a lawsuit (even a frivolous one) is costly and time consuming and a big hassle.
Implode-o-meter was sued by a mortgage company that lost financing allegedly because of leaks on implode-o-meter about their financial health.
The suit was thrown out but but Aaron Krowne had to spend thousands to defend himself. Then he had to incorporate to protect himself.
OCR has no obligation to post his address or defend his purchase.
I see OCR as someone who chronicles the housing bubble as a pass-time on his blog. Just because he ridicules knife catchers, doesn’t preclude him from being one himself.
His speech is protected speech. If you don’t like it, don’t read it.
One good reason to remain anonymous is if you can’t be served, then you can’t be sued.
January 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM #330952patientlywaitingParticipant[quote=Trojan4Life]Breeze,
If everything OCR did to make his purchase was above board, why would he be worried that someone has information about his identity that could lead to him being sued?
There’s more to this than meets the eye, but the legions of BMIT readers aren’t willing to look further than their nose.[/quote]
Responding to a lawsuit (even a frivolous one) is costly and time consuming and a big hassle.
Implode-o-meter was sued by a mortgage company that lost financing allegedly because of leaks on implode-o-meter about their financial health.
The suit was thrown out but but Aaron Krowne had to spend thousands to defend himself. Then he had to incorporate to protect himself.
OCR has no obligation to post his address or defend his purchase.
I see OCR as someone who chronicles the housing bubble as a pass-time on his blog. Just because he ridicules knife catchers, doesn’t preclude him from being one himself.
His speech is protected speech. If you don’t like it, don’t read it.
One good reason to remain anonymous is if you can’t be served, then you can’t be sued.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.