delete
delete
delete
delete
delete
Yes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
Yes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
Yes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
Yes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
Yes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]
Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]
Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]
Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]
Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.