- This topic has 605 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM #329370January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM #328951
jpinpb
Participantdelete
January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM #329288jpinpb
Participantdelete
January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM #329360jpinpb
Participantdelete
January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM #329388jpinpb
Participantdelete
January 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM #329471jpinpb
Participantdelete
January 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM #328946jpinpb
ParticipantYes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
January 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM #329283jpinpb
ParticipantYes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
January 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM #329355jpinpb
ParticipantYes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
January 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM #329383jpinpb
ParticipantYes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
January 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM #329465jpinpb
ParticipantYes, how dare we cheer on someone exposing the fraudsters. Our bad. Let’s just turn a blind eye to it all.
January 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM #328989patientlywaiting
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
January 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM #329328patientlywaiting
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
January 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM #329399patientlywaiting
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
January 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM #329427patientlywaiting
Participant[quote=Trojan4Life]
Throwing numbers up without providing any analysis of substance isn’t exactly what I was talking about. Do you see a difference between Rich’s analysis and OCR’s?
[/quote]Who says anyone has to analyze anything? Let the reader do their own analysis and form their own opinions. It’s better to have the data and examples excesses than for the information to be hidden.
If you don’t like it don’t read it. That’s what freedom of speech is all about.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
