Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Best way to form a trust?
- This topic has 95 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by sdsurfer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2011 at 3:28 PM #703110June 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM #703175sdduuuudeParticipant
Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.
June 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM #703681sdduuuudeParticipantHolding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.
June 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM #702583sdduuuudeParticipantHolding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.
June 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM #703324sdduuuudeParticipantHolding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.
June 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM #702484sdduuuudeParticipantHolding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.
June 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM #702603earlyretirementParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.[/quote]
Excellent post sdduuude. I completely agree. I think anyone in California would be silly not to have a trust. As you mentioned, the benefit isn’t for us but our heirs.
You got a pretty good price for all of that. My lawyer charges $1,500 for those things.
June 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM #703701earlyretirementParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.[/quote]
Excellent post sdduuude. I completely agree. I think anyone in California would be silly not to have a trust. As you mentioned, the benefit isn’t for us but our heirs.
You got a pretty good price for all of that. My lawyer charges $1,500 for those things.
June 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM #703195earlyretirementParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.[/quote]
Excellent post sdduuude. I completely agree. I think anyone in California would be silly not to have a trust. As you mentioned, the benefit isn’t for us but our heirs.
You got a pretty good price for all of that. My lawyer charges $1,500 for those things.
June 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM #703344earlyretirementParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.[/quote]
Excellent post sdduuude. I completely agree. I think anyone in California would be silly not to have a trust. As you mentioned, the benefit isn’t for us but our heirs.
You got a pretty good price for all of that. My lawyer charges $1,500 for those things.
June 10, 2011 at 11:39 PM #702504earlyretirementParticipant[quote=sdduuuude]Holding property in trust offers little benefit to me. The benefit is to my heirs should I die or be deemed incompetent.
Basically, a trust lays the framework to transfer assets from me to my heirs without going through the government at all.
Without it, the assets go through a process called probate, which is basically a scam for a govt employee to charge my wife and/or kids $10K to $100K to shuffle papers around for two years before they actually get the stuff that I will to them.
With a trust, probate is avoided. Some inheiritance tax is avoided, but not all. The real benefit is to avoid probate.
If I recall, the right kind of trust also avoids a reset of taxable value when a house is transferred to the kids.[/quote]
Excellent post sdduuude. I completely agree. I think anyone in California would be silly not to have a trust. As you mentioned, the benefit isn’t for us but our heirs.
You got a pretty good price for all of that. My lawyer charges $1,500 for those things.
June 10, 2011 at 11:50 PM #703210anParticipantI agree with everything sdduuuude said. It’s totally worth it. Check with your company as well to see if they have any group lawyer service. If they do, sign up for it. It’ll save you a lot of money. I think to sign up, we have to pay something like $6/month. To do all the docs that sdduuuude stated, I was charged $250. So after said and done, I’m out ~$350 to have all of those docs draft up by a lawyer.
June 10, 2011 at 11:50 PM #703359anParticipantI agree with everything sdduuuude said. It’s totally worth it. Check with your company as well to see if they have any group lawyer service. If they do, sign up for it. It’ll save you a lot of money. I think to sign up, we have to pay something like $6/month. To do all the docs that sdduuuude stated, I was charged $250. So after said and done, I’m out ~$350 to have all of those docs draft up by a lawyer.
June 10, 2011 at 11:50 PM #702618anParticipantI agree with everything sdduuuude said. It’s totally worth it. Check with your company as well to see if they have any group lawyer service. If they do, sign up for it. It’ll save you a lot of money. I think to sign up, we have to pay something like $6/month. To do all the docs that sdduuuude stated, I was charged $250. So after said and done, I’m out ~$350 to have all of those docs draft up by a lawyer.
June 10, 2011 at 11:50 PM #703716anParticipantI agree with everything sdduuuude said. It’s totally worth it. Check with your company as well to see if they have any group lawyer service. If they do, sign up for it. It’ll save you a lot of money. I think to sign up, we have to pay something like $6/month. To do all the docs that sdduuuude stated, I was charged $250. So after said and done, I’m out ~$350 to have all of those docs draft up by a lawyer.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.