- This topic has 70 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160637February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #161039jpinpbParticipant
I didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160938jpinpbParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160970jpinpbParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160953jpinpbParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160643jpinpbParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #161000pemelizaParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160981pemelizaParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160969pemelizaParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160671pemelizaParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #161069pemelizaParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #160687RaybyrnesParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #161084RaybyrnesParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #160984RaybyrnesParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #161015RaybyrnesParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.