- This topic has 70 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160637February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #161039
jpinpb
ParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160938jpinpb
ParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160970jpinpb
ParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160953jpinpb
ParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:34 AM #160643jpinpb
ParticipantI didn’t read all the posts, but when first posted, I read about Wells Fargo requiring 20% down before they’ll consider lending to you.
Some bankers are not completely out of their minds.
So will we all have to resort to ARMs to buy a house? Seems risky. Lowering today, but what about next year? Many of these defaults and foreclosures, seems to me, they were not Annie thinking about tomorrow.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #161000pemeliza
ParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160981pemeliza
ParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160969pemeliza
ParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #160671pemeliza
ParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 8:58 AM #161069pemeliza
ParticipantI have to agree with Raybyrnes a bit on this one.
The rate on a 5/1 arm is only slightly over 5%. I still don’t think it is time to buy, but these low rates look like they could at least give buyers and bagholders the means to perpetuate this mess (if they can qualify).
I’m starting to feel like a bagholder myself with Big Ben submarining the value of my dollar stash. At some point all of us pigs are going to have to confront the fact that the road to prudent wealth has gotten longer and we may be on the losing side of this epic battle.
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #160687Raybyrnes
ParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #161084Raybyrnes
ParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #160984Raybyrnes
ParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
February 27, 2008 at 9:09 AM #161015Raybyrnes
ParticipantThe prudent thing at first appeared to be to use a 30 year fixed to finance a home. Now we are seeing how risk taking is going to be rewarded. For many borrower they are going to substancially benefit if by the time of reset interest rates ahve fallen back to their previous teaser rates. The spread between the reasonable fixed rates vs. the unprecedently low teaser rate means that those who took the risk save a ton of dough over the last 3 to 5 years. Can anyone argue against this?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.