- This topic has 90 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
Artifact.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2008 at 3:04 PM #148264February 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM #148270
nostradamus
ParticipantThey typo'd and forgot the "1" before the rest of the price tag?
Nope, they explicitly state
"Last sale aug 1993 for $115,000..This is a steal!!!"
My guess would be that access is limited, the land contains the rare blue-bellied gnat-catching muggle-whumper, or it is an ancient Indian burial ground.
February 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM #148168ParticipantThey typo'd and forgot the "1" before the rest of the price tag?
Nope, they explicitly state
"Last sale aug 1993 for $115,000..This is a steal!!!"
My guess would be that access is limited, the land contains the rare blue-bellied gnat-catching muggle-whumper, or it is an ancient Indian burial ground.
February 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM #148189ParticipantThey typo'd and forgot the "1" before the rest of the price tag?
Nope, they explicitly state
"Last sale aug 1993 for $115,000..This is a steal!!!"
My guess would be that access is limited, the land contains the rare blue-bellied gnat-catching muggle-whumper, or it is an ancient Indian burial ground.
February 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM #147921ParticipantThey typo'd and forgot the "1" before the rest of the price tag?
Nope, they explicitly state
"Last sale aug 1993 for $115,000..This is a steal!!!"
My guess would be that access is limited, the land contains the rare blue-bellied gnat-catching muggle-whumper, or it is an ancient Indian burial ground.
February 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM #148202ParticipantThey typo'd and forgot the "1" before the rest of the price tag?
Nope, they explicitly state
"Last sale aug 1993 for $115,000..This is a steal!!!"
My guess would be that access is limited, the land contains the rare blue-bellied gnat-catching muggle-whumper, or it is an ancient Indian burial ground.
February 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM #148183ParticipantDoesn’t look like extreme slope to me, although they might be showing only one small part of it.
Are you certain there is no access? Or is this based on looking at the map only?
[img_assist|nid=6411|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM #148285ParticipantDoesn’t look like extreme slope to me, although they might be showing only one small part of it.
Are you certain there is no access? Or is this based on looking at the map only?
[img_assist|nid=6411|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM #147936ParticipantDoesn’t look like extreme slope to me, although they might be showing only one small part of it.
Are you certain there is no access? Or is this based on looking at the map only?
[img_assist|nid=6411|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM #148204ParticipantDoesn’t look like extreme slope to me, although they might be showing only one small part of it.
Are you certain there is no access? Or is this based on looking at the map only?
[img_assist|nid=6411|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM #148217ParticipantDoesn’t look like extreme slope to me, although they might be showing only one small part of it.
Are you certain there is no access? Or is this based on looking at the map only?
[img_assist|nid=6411|title=|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=316]
February 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM #148242Bugs
ParticipantI looked at the plat map and the zoning map. This parcel is surrounded by little SFR lots on the mesas to the east and west. If there is a driveway easement to this site it isn’t obvious. Even if there is a driveway easement, if it isn’t wide enough and/or if they can’t expand the width the city might not issue the building permit. Any more, most fire agencies want a driveway that’s at least 20 feet wide for these interior lots. They’d be even less amenable to dealing if there was a lot of topo involved.
Gotta get water and sewer to this site before you can develop it. If there’s a natural drainage course or if there’s an open space easement that prevents getting those utilities in it can get complicated.
If nothing else, a couple NIMBY neighbors could effectively prevent development if they used their imagination. It’s not that hard to do.
Developing land often looks a lot easier than it is.
February 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM #147961ParticipantI looked at the plat map and the zoning map. This parcel is surrounded by little SFR lots on the mesas to the east and west. If there is a driveway easement to this site it isn’t obvious. Even if there is a driveway easement, if it isn’t wide enough and/or if they can’t expand the width the city might not issue the building permit. Any more, most fire agencies want a driveway that’s at least 20 feet wide for these interior lots. They’d be even less amenable to dealing if there was a lot of topo involved.
Gotta get water and sewer to this site before you can develop it. If there’s a natural drainage course or if there’s an open space easement that prevents getting those utilities in it can get complicated.
If nothing else, a couple NIMBY neighbors could effectively prevent development if they used their imagination. It’s not that hard to do.
Developing land often looks a lot easier than it is.
February 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM #148310ParticipantI looked at the plat map and the zoning map. This parcel is surrounded by little SFR lots on the mesas to the east and west. If there is a driveway easement to this site it isn’t obvious. Even if there is a driveway easement, if it isn’t wide enough and/or if they can’t expand the width the city might not issue the building permit. Any more, most fire agencies want a driveway that’s at least 20 feet wide for these interior lots. They’d be even less amenable to dealing if there was a lot of topo involved.
Gotta get water and sewer to this site before you can develop it. If there’s a natural drainage course or if there’s an open space easement that prevents getting those utilities in it can get complicated.
If nothing else, a couple NIMBY neighbors could effectively prevent development if they used their imagination. It’s not that hard to do.
Developing land often looks a lot easier than it is.
February 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM #148208ParticipantI looked at the plat map and the zoning map. This parcel is surrounded by little SFR lots on the mesas to the east and west. If there is a driveway easement to this site it isn’t obvious. Even if there is a driveway easement, if it isn’t wide enough and/or if they can’t expand the width the city might not issue the building permit. Any more, most fire agencies want a driveway that’s at least 20 feet wide for these interior lots. They’d be even less amenable to dealing if there was a lot of topo involved.
Gotta get water and sewer to this site before you can develop it. If there’s a natural drainage course or if there’s an open space easement that prevents getting those utilities in it can get complicated.
If nothing else, a couple NIMBY neighbors could effectively prevent development if they used their imagination. It’s not that hard to do.
Developing land often looks a lot easier than it is.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.