- This topic has 30 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by bob007.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2008 at 11:00 PM #12137March 16, 2008 at 11:06 PM #171372jpinpbParticipant
Hundreds of rentals? More like tens of thousands of rentals. I don’t see it. But there’s so much insanity, I guess anything could happen.
March 16, 2008 at 11:06 PM #171811jpinpbParticipantHundreds of rentals? More like tens of thousands of rentals. I don’t see it. But there’s so much insanity, I guess anything could happen.
March 16, 2008 at 11:06 PM #171703jpinpbParticipantHundreds of rentals? More like tens of thousands of rentals. I don’t see it. But there’s so much insanity, I guess anything could happen.
March 16, 2008 at 11:06 PM #171709jpinpbParticipantHundreds of rentals? More like tens of thousands of rentals. I don’t see it. But there’s so much insanity, I guess anything could happen.
March 16, 2008 at 11:06 PM #171731jpinpbParticipantHundreds of rentals? More like tens of thousands of rentals. I don’t see it. But there’s so much insanity, I guess anything could happen.
March 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM #171387SD RealtorParticipantI don’t see this happening. This would turn the underlying asset backing up the security into an entirely different entity then it started out as. There is also an oversimplification that you are talking about. There are multiple lenders if there is more then one mortgage right? Furthermore the bank/lender/servicing organization also takes on liability by turning the home into a rental. What happens if the tenant injures himself in the home due to a problem with the home? What happens when the tenant stops paying rent and needs to be evicted? Basically I don’t see any of this happening at all. We have had threads in the past bringing this up and some posters swear that this has indeed happened before. Perhaps it has but I am not familiar with it… then again I am just a pup with regards to tenure so take my opinion with lots of grains of salt.
SD Realtor
March 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM #171826SD RealtorParticipantI don’t see this happening. This would turn the underlying asset backing up the security into an entirely different entity then it started out as. There is also an oversimplification that you are talking about. There are multiple lenders if there is more then one mortgage right? Furthermore the bank/lender/servicing organization also takes on liability by turning the home into a rental. What happens if the tenant injures himself in the home due to a problem with the home? What happens when the tenant stops paying rent and needs to be evicted? Basically I don’t see any of this happening at all. We have had threads in the past bringing this up and some posters swear that this has indeed happened before. Perhaps it has but I am not familiar with it… then again I am just a pup with regards to tenure so take my opinion with lots of grains of salt.
SD Realtor
March 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM #171718SD RealtorParticipantI don’t see this happening. This would turn the underlying asset backing up the security into an entirely different entity then it started out as. There is also an oversimplification that you are talking about. There are multiple lenders if there is more then one mortgage right? Furthermore the bank/lender/servicing organization also takes on liability by turning the home into a rental. What happens if the tenant injures himself in the home due to a problem with the home? What happens when the tenant stops paying rent and needs to be evicted? Basically I don’t see any of this happening at all. We have had threads in the past bringing this up and some posters swear that this has indeed happened before. Perhaps it has but I am not familiar with it… then again I am just a pup with regards to tenure so take my opinion with lots of grains of salt.
SD Realtor
March 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM #171726SD RealtorParticipantI don’t see this happening. This would turn the underlying asset backing up the security into an entirely different entity then it started out as. There is also an oversimplification that you are talking about. There are multiple lenders if there is more then one mortgage right? Furthermore the bank/lender/servicing organization also takes on liability by turning the home into a rental. What happens if the tenant injures himself in the home due to a problem with the home? What happens when the tenant stops paying rent and needs to be evicted? Basically I don’t see any of this happening at all. We have had threads in the past bringing this up and some posters swear that this has indeed happened before. Perhaps it has but I am not familiar with it… then again I am just a pup with regards to tenure so take my opinion with lots of grains of salt.
SD Realtor
March 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM #171744SD RealtorParticipantI don’t see this happening. This would turn the underlying asset backing up the security into an entirely different entity then it started out as. There is also an oversimplification that you are talking about. There are multiple lenders if there is more then one mortgage right? Furthermore the bank/lender/servicing organization also takes on liability by turning the home into a rental. What happens if the tenant injures himself in the home due to a problem with the home? What happens when the tenant stops paying rent and needs to be evicted? Basically I don’t see any of this happening at all. We have had threads in the past bringing this up and some posters swear that this has indeed happened before. Perhaps it has but I am not familiar with it… then again I am just a pup with regards to tenure so take my opinion with lots of grains of salt.
SD Realtor
March 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM #171788peterbParticipantIn the early 1990’s I knew someone who did quick remodels for REO’s that were about to be put on the market…paint, carpet, landscape type work. He said that there was a standing policy that every couple of weeks they would just knock $5K or $10K off the price until it sold. None became rentals. He said that people would low ball, get rejected and then 6 weeks later the banks were comming back to the offeror to see if they still wanted to buy!!
March 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM #171870peterbParticipantIn the early 1990’s I knew someone who did quick remodels for REO’s that were about to be put on the market…paint, carpet, landscape type work. He said that there was a standing policy that every couple of weeks they would just knock $5K or $10K off the price until it sold. None became rentals. He said that people would low ball, get rejected and then 6 weeks later the banks were comming back to the offeror to see if they still wanted to buy!!
March 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM #171769peterbParticipantIn the early 1990’s I knew someone who did quick remodels for REO’s that were about to be put on the market…paint, carpet, landscape type work. He said that there was a standing policy that every couple of weeks they would just knock $5K or $10K off the price until it sold. None became rentals. He said that people would low ball, get rejected and then 6 weeks later the banks were comming back to the offeror to see if they still wanted to buy!!
March 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM #171765peterbParticipantIn the early 1990’s I knew someone who did quick remodels for REO’s that were about to be put on the market…paint, carpet, landscape type work. He said that there was a standing policy that every couple of weeks they would just knock $5K or $10K off the price until it sold. None became rentals. He said that people would low ball, get rejected and then 6 weeks later the banks were comming back to the offeror to see if they still wanted to buy!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.