- This topic has 75 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 24, 2010 at 8:22 PM #530731March 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM #531423SD RealtorParticipant
JP that is pretty funny. Actually though, after thinking about it, I kind of like that. If you think about it, at least there is not the old double ended advantage for the listing agent right?
March 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM #530746SD RealtorParticipantJP that is pretty funny. Actually though, after thinking about it, I kind of like that. If you think about it, at least there is not the old double ended advantage for the listing agent right?
March 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM #531326SD RealtorParticipantJP that is pretty funny. Actually though, after thinking about it, I kind of like that. If you think about it, at least there is not the old double ended advantage for the listing agent right?
March 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM #531682SD RealtorParticipantJP that is pretty funny. Actually though, after thinking about it, I kind of like that. If you think about it, at least there is not the old double ended advantage for the listing agent right?
March 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM #530874SD RealtorParticipantJP that is pretty funny. Actually though, after thinking about it, I kind of like that. If you think about it, at least there is not the old double ended advantage for the listing agent right?
March 25, 2010 at 8:02 AM #531811jpinpbParticipantSDR – True. But since that’s generally not the practice, whoever is handling this is at a disadvantage. Maybe it’ll catch on and other banks will follow suit. Clearly somehow this is saving them money.
March 25, 2010 at 8:02 AM #531553jpinpbParticipantSDR – True. But since that’s generally not the practice, whoever is handling this is at a disadvantage. Maybe it’ll catch on and other banks will follow suit. Clearly somehow this is saving them money.
March 25, 2010 at 8:02 AM #530876jpinpbParticipantSDR – True. But since that’s generally not the practice, whoever is handling this is at a disadvantage. Maybe it’ll catch on and other banks will follow suit. Clearly somehow this is saving them money.
March 25, 2010 at 8:02 AM #531456jpinpbParticipantSDR – True. But since that’s generally not the practice, whoever is handling this is at a disadvantage. Maybe it’ll catch on and other banks will follow suit. Clearly somehow this is saving them money.
March 25, 2010 at 8:02 AM #531004jpinpbParticipantSDR – True. But since that’s generally not the practice, whoever is handling this is at a disadvantage. Maybe it’ll catch on and other banks will follow suit. Clearly somehow this is saving them money.
March 25, 2010 at 8:08 AM #5315584plexownerParticipant“PROPERTY SOLD AS IS WITHOUT REPAIR OR WARRANTY”
which means only cash buyers need to apply (unless the bank wants to provide a loan that they will keep on their own books which is not unheard of)
March 25, 2010 at 8:08 AM #5318164plexownerParticipant“PROPERTY SOLD AS IS WITHOUT REPAIR OR WARRANTY”
which means only cash buyers need to apply (unless the bank wants to provide a loan that they will keep on their own books which is not unheard of)
March 25, 2010 at 8:08 AM #5308814plexownerParticipant“PROPERTY SOLD AS IS WITHOUT REPAIR OR WARRANTY”
which means only cash buyers need to apply (unless the bank wants to provide a loan that they will keep on their own books which is not unheard of)
March 25, 2010 at 8:08 AM #5310094plexownerParticipant“PROPERTY SOLD AS IS WITHOUT REPAIR OR WARRANTY”
which means only cash buyers need to apply (unless the bank wants to provide a loan that they will keep on their own books which is not unheard of)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.