Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Bailout plan: hot off the press
- This topic has 60 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by temeculaguy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2007 at 1:08 PM #110558December 6, 2007 at 1:37 PM #110720pbnativeParticipant
I’m curious what the people who hold all these loans think they should do. They don’t like this idea of a freeze, and put lots of requirements around it. Seems like they want to continue foreclosing if the borrower can’t pay as scheduled. Of course that’s the reasonable, legal thing to do, but how can that be in their own financial best interest in the current situation?
Do they think people will start to magically make more money and pay their bill? Do they think the market is coming back any sec? Or do they want the whole situation to get so bad the govt has to truly bail them out?
December 6, 2007 at 1:37 PM #110739pbnativeParticipantI’m curious what the people who hold all these loans think they should do. They don’t like this idea of a freeze, and put lots of requirements around it. Seems like they want to continue foreclosing if the borrower can’t pay as scheduled. Of course that’s the reasonable, legal thing to do, but how can that be in their own financial best interest in the current situation?
Do they think people will start to magically make more money and pay their bill? Do they think the market is coming back any sec? Or do they want the whole situation to get so bad the govt has to truly bail them out?
December 6, 2007 at 1:37 PM #110735pbnativeParticipantI’m curious what the people who hold all these loans think they should do. They don’t like this idea of a freeze, and put lots of requirements around it. Seems like they want to continue foreclosing if the borrower can’t pay as scheduled. Of course that’s the reasonable, legal thing to do, but how can that be in their own financial best interest in the current situation?
Do they think people will start to magically make more money and pay their bill? Do they think the market is coming back any sec? Or do they want the whole situation to get so bad the govt has to truly bail them out?
December 6, 2007 at 1:37 PM #110573pbnativeParticipantI’m curious what the people who hold all these loans think they should do. They don’t like this idea of a freeze, and put lots of requirements around it. Seems like they want to continue foreclosing if the borrower can’t pay as scheduled. Of course that’s the reasonable, legal thing to do, but how can that be in their own financial best interest in the current situation?
Do they think people will start to magically make more money and pay their bill? Do they think the market is coming back any sec? Or do they want the whole situation to get so bad the govt has to truly bail them out?
December 6, 2007 at 1:37 PM #110691pbnativeParticipantI’m curious what the people who hold all these loans think they should do. They don’t like this idea of a freeze, and put lots of requirements around it. Seems like they want to continue foreclosing if the borrower can’t pay as scheduled. Of course that’s the reasonable, legal thing to do, but how can that be in their own financial best interest in the current situation?
Do they think people will start to magically make more money and pay their bill? Do they think the market is coming back any sec? Or do they want the whole situation to get so bad the govt has to truly bail them out?
December 6, 2007 at 2:37 PM #110618SHILOHParticipantI don’t understand how they can change the terms of a loan…when these loans have been split up and sold as MBS with contracts….
Since when can you just start changing contracts? If both parties agree?What about all the other people who were foreclosed on under the contract? Will they have recourse if the contract has changed?
December 6, 2007 at 2:37 PM #110736SHILOHParticipantI don’t understand how they can change the terms of a loan…when these loans have been split up and sold as MBS with contracts….
Since when can you just start changing contracts? If both parties agree?What about all the other people who were foreclosed on under the contract? Will they have recourse if the contract has changed?
December 6, 2007 at 2:37 PM #110784SHILOHParticipantI don’t understand how they can change the terms of a loan…when these loans have been split up and sold as MBS with contracts….
Since when can you just start changing contracts? If both parties agree?What about all the other people who were foreclosed on under the contract? Will they have recourse if the contract has changed?
December 6, 2007 at 2:37 PM #110767SHILOHParticipantI don’t understand how they can change the terms of a loan…when these loans have been split up and sold as MBS with contracts….
Since when can you just start changing contracts? If both parties agree?What about all the other people who were foreclosed on under the contract? Will they have recourse if the contract has changed?
December 6, 2007 at 2:37 PM #110780SHILOHParticipantI don’t understand how they can change the terms of a loan…when these loans have been split up and sold as MBS with contracts….
Since when can you just start changing contracts? If both parties agree?What about all the other people who were foreclosed on under the contract? Will they have recourse if the contract has changed?
December 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM #110777kev374Participant
-Minimum 660 FICO requirement-No more than 60 days past due on payments
-Must have at least 3% equity
This bailout is an eyewash. If a buyer had an exotic loan or teaser rate ARM it’s almost certain they haven’t built any equity!!
And there is an additional requirement that the purchase must be post 2005. Since that time housing values have only gone down so almost 100% of these people are upside down. Any equity requirements rules them out completely!
December 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM #110790kev374Participant
-Minimum 660 FICO requirement-No more than 60 days past due on payments
-Must have at least 3% equity
This bailout is an eyewash. If a buyer had an exotic loan or teaser rate ARM it’s almost certain they haven’t built any equity!!
And there is an additional requirement that the purchase must be post 2005. Since that time housing values have only gone down so almost 100% of these people are upside down. Any equity requirements rules them out completely!
December 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM #110794kev374Participant
-Minimum 660 FICO requirement-No more than 60 days past due on payments
-Must have at least 3% equity
This bailout is an eyewash. If a buyer had an exotic loan or teaser rate ARM it’s almost certain they haven’t built any equity!!
And there is an additional requirement that the purchase must be post 2005. Since that time housing values have only gone down so almost 100% of these people are upside down. Any equity requirements rules them out completely!
December 6, 2007 at 2:44 PM #110746kev374Participant
-Minimum 660 FICO requirement-No more than 60 days past due on payments
-Must have at least 3% equity
This bailout is an eyewash. If a buyer had an exotic loan or teaser rate ARM it’s almost certain they haven’t built any equity!!
And there is an additional requirement that the purchase must be post 2005. Since that time housing values have only gone down so almost 100% of these people are upside down. Any equity requirements rules them out completely!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.