- This topic has 99 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2007 at 10:32 AM #91029October 23, 2007 at 10:42 AM #91021kayceeParticipant
Regarding the insurance question. My mother had serious damage to her house due to a hurricaine. The initial insurance payment went to the lender to pay off the note. She then applied for a construction loan to rebuild the house, and then once the U&O certificate was issued, she refinanced into a traditional, brand new mortgage. She ended up even to a little bit ahead when all was said & done. This was many moons ago but I assume the process is the same. The lender doesn’t care if you leave a burned out shell. But generally the city/township does. They can’t make you rebuild, but they can make you take down the damaged building and landscape the lot. Not sure what effect/power the HOA has in such a situation though. My thoughts and prayers to all affected.
October 23, 2007 at 10:42 AM #90998kayceeParticipantRegarding the insurance question. My mother had serious damage to her house due to a hurricaine. The initial insurance payment went to the lender to pay off the note. She then applied for a construction loan to rebuild the house, and then once the U&O certificate was issued, she refinanced into a traditional, brand new mortgage. She ended up even to a little bit ahead when all was said & done. This was many moons ago but I assume the process is the same. The lender doesn’t care if you leave a burned out shell. But generally the city/township does. They can’t make you rebuild, but they can make you take down the damaged building and landscape the lot. Not sure what effect/power the HOA has in such a situation though. My thoughts and prayers to all affected.
October 23, 2007 at 10:42 AM #91031kayceeParticipantRegarding the insurance question. My mother had serious damage to her house due to a hurricaine. The initial insurance payment went to the lender to pay off the note. She then applied for a construction loan to rebuild the house, and then once the U&O certificate was issued, she refinanced into a traditional, brand new mortgage. She ended up even to a little bit ahead when all was said & done. This was many moons ago but I assume the process is the same. The lender doesn’t care if you leave a burned out shell. But generally the city/township does. They can’t make you rebuild, but they can make you take down the damaged building and landscape the lot. Not sure what effect/power the HOA has in such a situation though. My thoughts and prayers to all affected.
October 23, 2007 at 10:45 AM #91005EugeneParticipant“replacement cost is no more than 150% of the value of their policy coverage”
well 150% is still a good chunk of money. A new $1 million house in 4S ranch might have assessed value of buildings in $500k range.
The bigger question is, does 150% really cover what it costs to rebuild, when the house was originally built by a megabuilder like Lennar as part of subdivision containing 200 identical houses (so that Lennar could cut costs), and now it has to be rebuilt by custom contractors?
October 23, 2007 at 10:45 AM #91026EugeneParticipant“replacement cost is no more than 150% of the value of their policy coverage”
well 150% is still a good chunk of money. A new $1 million house in 4S ranch might have assessed value of buildings in $500k range.
The bigger question is, does 150% really cover what it costs to rebuild, when the house was originally built by a megabuilder like Lennar as part of subdivision containing 200 identical houses (so that Lennar could cut costs), and now it has to be rebuilt by custom contractors?
October 23, 2007 at 10:45 AM #91039EugeneParticipant“replacement cost is no more than 150% of the value of their policy coverage”
well 150% is still a good chunk of money. A new $1 million house in 4S ranch might have assessed value of buildings in $500k range.
The bigger question is, does 150% really cover what it costs to rebuild, when the house was originally built by a megabuilder like Lennar as part of subdivision containing 200 identical houses (so that Lennar could cut costs), and now it has to be rebuilt by custom contractors?
October 23, 2007 at 10:50 AM #91008crParticipantQuick follow up-
I just read in the paper the # of lost homes in SD is 655.To put that in perspective I did a quick search and found that in October of ’06 3,282 homes were sold in the county, down 21% from 4,155 12mos prior.
The current number of homes lost is ~20% of last October’s monthly sales volume.
October 23, 2007 at 10:50 AM #91041crParticipantQuick follow up-
I just read in the paper the # of lost homes in SD is 655.To put that in perspective I did a quick search and found that in October of ’06 3,282 homes were sold in the county, down 21% from 4,155 12mos prior.
The current number of homes lost is ~20% of last October’s monthly sales volume.
October 23, 2007 at 10:50 AM #91030crParticipantQuick follow up-
I just read in the paper the # of lost homes in SD is 655.To put that in perspective I did a quick search and found that in October of ’06 3,282 homes were sold in the county, down 21% from 4,155 12mos prior.
The current number of homes lost is ~20% of last October’s monthly sales volume.
October 23, 2007 at 11:08 AM #91054AnonymousGuestHere’s an even better question. When these houses are re-built, does the ‘closing’ go down as a sale in the books? If so, over 800 homes just went pending with closing dates in the next 6 months – 2 years.
October 23, 2007 at 11:08 AM #91040AnonymousGuestHere’s an even better question. When these houses are re-built, does the ‘closing’ go down as a sale in the books? If so, over 800 homes just went pending with closing dates in the next 6 months – 2 years.
October 23, 2007 at 11:08 AM #91020AnonymousGuestHere’s an even better question. When these houses are re-built, does the ‘closing’ go down as a sale in the books? If so, over 800 homes just went pending with closing dates in the next 6 months – 2 years.
October 23, 2007 at 11:50 AM #91072EugeneParticipantDon’t compare these numbers with existing home sales.
If people who lost their homes are in position to buy new homes to replace the ones they lost (and it seems from this thread that they aren’t), this has the effect of absorbing ~1 month of production of new homes in the county.
If not, the fire simply creates temporary additional demand for 700 rental apartments/houses.
October 23, 2007 at 11:50 AM #91060EugeneParticipantDon’t compare these numbers with existing home sales.
If people who lost their homes are in position to buy new homes to replace the ones they lost (and it seems from this thread that they aren’t), this has the effect of absorbing ~1 month of production of new homes in the county.
If not, the fire simply creates temporary additional demand for 700 rental apartments/houses.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.