- This topic has 99 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Raybyrnes.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2007 at 9:19 AM #90947October 23, 2007 at 9:22 AM #90975Rich ToscanoKeymaster
Hi PW – The thing is, you don’t really have to claim hardship to walk away. You can just walk away. (You’ll get less sympathy, I will admit).
However, that’s a good point about taking the money and running. That’s a pretty huge loophole though, and maybe they have things in place to prevent it. Hopefully someone with some experience or knowledge in this area can chime in.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:22 AM #90988Rich ToscanoKeymasterHi PW – The thing is, you don’t really have to claim hardship to walk away. You can just walk away. (You’ll get less sympathy, I will admit).
However, that’s a good point about taking the money and running. That’s a pretty huge loophole though, and maybe they have things in place to prevent it. Hopefully someone with some experience or knowledge in this area can chime in.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:22 AM #90953Rich ToscanoKeymasterHi PW – The thing is, you don’t really have to claim hardship to walk away. You can just walk away. (You’ll get less sympathy, I will admit).
However, that’s a good point about taking the money and running. That’s a pretty huge loophole though, and maybe they have things in place to prevent it. Hopefully someone with some experience or knowledge in this area can chime in.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:33 AM #90992justdoitstewartParticipantSome of you are missing the point of the post; it wasn’t to dissect if the destroyed home would help or hurt the FB/flopper. It was supposed to be about the mentality of the FB/flopper in a desperate situation that might have a “way out” (in their mind) and also how it will affect the Diego economy/housing prices.
(Alot of the people that are in the mess of being a FB/flopper are the same people who have no clue how their insurance works.)
October 23, 2007 at 9:33 AM #90959justdoitstewartParticipantSome of you are missing the point of the post; it wasn’t to dissect if the destroyed home would help or hurt the FB/flopper. It was supposed to be about the mentality of the FB/flopper in a desperate situation that might have a “way out” (in their mind) and also how it will affect the Diego economy/housing prices.
(Alot of the people that are in the mess of being a FB/flopper are the same people who have no clue how their insurance works.)
October 23, 2007 at 9:33 AM #90980justdoitstewartParticipantSome of you are missing the point of the post; it wasn’t to dissect if the destroyed home would help or hurt the FB/flopper. It was supposed to be about the mentality of the FB/flopper in a desperate situation that might have a “way out” (in their mind) and also how it will affect the Diego economy/housing prices.
(Alot of the people that are in the mess of being a FB/flopper are the same people who have no clue how their insurance works.)
October 23, 2007 at 9:34 AM #90990sandiegoParticipantThe insurance company doesn’t care if you rebuild, the lender will.
Your loan docs will spell out who gets the proceeds from the insurance settlement.
If your house is paid off, you get a check for the amount to rebuild. You can do anything you want with it. The insurance company can’t make you rebuild.
October 23, 2007 at 9:34 AM #90956sandiegoParticipantThe insurance company doesn’t care if you rebuild, the lender will.
Your loan docs will spell out who gets the proceeds from the insurance settlement.
If your house is paid off, you get a check for the amount to rebuild. You can do anything you want with it. The insurance company can’t make you rebuild.
October 23, 2007 at 9:34 AM #90979sandiegoParticipantThe insurance company doesn’t care if you rebuild, the lender will.
Your loan docs will spell out who gets the proceeds from the insurance settlement.
If your house is paid off, you get a check for the amount to rebuild. You can do anything you want with it. The insurance company can’t make you rebuild.
October 23, 2007 at 9:36 AM #90997Rich ToscanoKeymasterGood point SD, the leinholder would surely be entitled to the insurance payout, it seems to me.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:36 AM #90985Rich ToscanoKeymasterGood point SD, the leinholder would surely be entitled to the insurance payout, it seems to me.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:36 AM #90962Rich ToscanoKeymasterGood point SD, the leinholder would surely be entitled to the insurance payout, it seems to me.
rich
October 23, 2007 at 9:43 AM #90991tothjjParticipantSo if the appraised value is way higher than the actual value, could the lienholder take the money and just leave the property an empty burned out lot.
October 23, 2007 at 9:43 AM #90968tothjjParticipantSo if the appraised value is way higher than the actual value, could the lienholder take the money and just leave the property an empty burned out lot.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.