Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Article: Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ‘Unsustainable’
- This topic has 185 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by wannabe2077.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM #400482May 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM #399831ArrayaParticipant
Allan-That is very interesting and does not surprise me. China is our main competitor for oil and has been jockeying for position in Africa for about a decade now. It seems like they have formed, at least, a temporary alliance with Russia and Nato has the ME in lock down except for Iran.
In regards to the reserve currency issue. I suspect that it has already been decided that the dollar is going to be replaced and Obama and others are telegraphing this now. Kind of letting the public digest it. China sure has been warning for over a year now. With the amount of time Goldman executives and Chinese speaking, Asian economics expert Giethner have spent over there that they must have brokered and/or aware of this, as well as financially positioning themselves if it is going to happen.
May 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM #400077ArrayaParticipantAllan-That is very interesting and does not surprise me. China is our main competitor for oil and has been jockeying for position in Africa for about a decade now. It seems like they have formed, at least, a temporary alliance with Russia and Nato has the ME in lock down except for Iran.
In regards to the reserve currency issue. I suspect that it has already been decided that the dollar is going to be replaced and Obama and others are telegraphing this now. Kind of letting the public digest it. China sure has been warning for over a year now. With the amount of time Goldman executives and Chinese speaking, Asian economics expert Giethner have spent over there that they must have brokered and/or aware of this, as well as financially positioning themselves if it is going to happen.
May 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM #400308ArrayaParticipantAllan-That is very interesting and does not surprise me. China is our main competitor for oil and has been jockeying for position in Africa for about a decade now. It seems like they have formed, at least, a temporary alliance with Russia and Nato has the ME in lock down except for Iran.
In regards to the reserve currency issue. I suspect that it has already been decided that the dollar is going to be replaced and Obama and others are telegraphing this now. Kind of letting the public digest it. China sure has been warning for over a year now. With the amount of time Goldman executives and Chinese speaking, Asian economics expert Giethner have spent over there that they must have brokered and/or aware of this, as well as financially positioning themselves if it is going to happen.
May 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM #400366ArrayaParticipantAllan-That is very interesting and does not surprise me. China is our main competitor for oil and has been jockeying for position in Africa for about a decade now. It seems like they have formed, at least, a temporary alliance with Russia and Nato has the ME in lock down except for Iran.
In regards to the reserve currency issue. I suspect that it has already been decided that the dollar is going to be replaced and Obama and others are telegraphing this now. Kind of letting the public digest it. China sure has been warning for over a year now. With the amount of time Goldman executives and Chinese speaking, Asian economics expert Giethner have spent over there that they must have brokered and/or aware of this, as well as financially positioning themselves if it is going to happen.
May 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM #400512ArrayaParticipantAllan-That is very interesting and does not surprise me. China is our main competitor for oil and has been jockeying for position in Africa for about a decade now. It seems like they have formed, at least, a temporary alliance with Russia and Nato has the ME in lock down except for Iran.
In regards to the reserve currency issue. I suspect that it has already been decided that the dollar is going to be replaced and Obama and others are telegraphing this now. Kind of letting the public digest it. China sure has been warning for over a year now. With the amount of time Goldman executives and Chinese speaking, Asian economics expert Giethner have spent over there that they must have brokered and/or aware of this, as well as financially positioning themselves if it is going to happen.
May 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM #399841EugeneParticipantNavy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.
Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
May 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM #400087EugeneParticipantNavy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.
Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
May 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM #400318EugeneParticipantNavy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.
Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
May 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM #400377EugeneParticipantNavy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.
Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
May 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM #400521EugeneParticipantNavy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.
Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
May 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM #399849NotCrankyParticipantResources O.K., I get the central asian situation a little better now…
This is the last sentence from the abstract pasted below: “and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.”
Central Asia: A major emerging energy player in the 21st century
James P. Dorian
International Energy Economist, 6201 Benalder Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, USA
Abstract
Energy is the most abundant and valuable natural resource of Central Asia and northwest China1 and includes oil, gas, coal, electricity, and renewables. Kazakhstan has large reserves of oil and coal. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have significant reserves of gas. Kyrgyzstan produces significant amounts of hydroelectric power. Xinjiang, China has significant coal resources and an uncertain, although generally promising, potential for oil in the Tarim basin. These energy reserves form the basis for future economic growth and development in the region, and energy exports are beginning to generate important foreign exchange revenues. Although Central Asia enjoys vast energy development potential, there are obstacles to exploiting these resources, including limited infrastructure for transporting energy—notably oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines—in the region, political turmoil, payment difficulties, and inadequate energy policies. Despite these challenges, however, with appropriate government planning Central Asia is poised to become a significant world supplier of energy, especially in the oil and gas sectors, and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.May 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM #400097NotCrankyParticipantResources O.K., I get the central asian situation a little better now…
This is the last sentence from the abstract pasted below: “and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.”
Central Asia: A major emerging energy player in the 21st century
James P. Dorian
International Energy Economist, 6201 Benalder Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, USA
Abstract
Energy is the most abundant and valuable natural resource of Central Asia and northwest China1 and includes oil, gas, coal, electricity, and renewables. Kazakhstan has large reserves of oil and coal. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have significant reserves of gas. Kyrgyzstan produces significant amounts of hydroelectric power. Xinjiang, China has significant coal resources and an uncertain, although generally promising, potential for oil in the Tarim basin. These energy reserves form the basis for future economic growth and development in the region, and energy exports are beginning to generate important foreign exchange revenues. Although Central Asia enjoys vast energy development potential, there are obstacles to exploiting these resources, including limited infrastructure for transporting energy—notably oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines—in the region, political turmoil, payment difficulties, and inadequate energy policies. Despite these challenges, however, with appropriate government planning Central Asia is poised to become a significant world supplier of energy, especially in the oil and gas sectors, and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.May 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM #400328NotCrankyParticipantResources O.K., I get the central asian situation a little better now…
This is the last sentence from the abstract pasted below: “and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.”
Central Asia: A major emerging energy player in the 21st century
James P. Dorian
International Energy Economist, 6201 Benalder Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, USA
Abstract
Energy is the most abundant and valuable natural resource of Central Asia and northwest China1 and includes oil, gas, coal, electricity, and renewables. Kazakhstan has large reserves of oil and coal. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have significant reserves of gas. Kyrgyzstan produces significant amounts of hydroelectric power. Xinjiang, China has significant coal resources and an uncertain, although generally promising, potential for oil in the Tarim basin. These energy reserves form the basis for future economic growth and development in the region, and energy exports are beginning to generate important foreign exchange revenues. Although Central Asia enjoys vast energy development potential, there are obstacles to exploiting these resources, including limited infrastructure for transporting energy—notably oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines—in the region, political turmoil, payment difficulties, and inadequate energy policies. Despite these challenges, however, with appropriate government planning Central Asia is poised to become a significant world supplier of energy, especially in the oil and gas sectors, and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.May 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM #400387NotCrankyParticipantResources O.K., I get the central asian situation a little better now…
This is the last sentence from the abstract pasted below: “and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.”
Central Asia: A major emerging energy player in the 21st century
James P. Dorian
International Energy Economist, 6201 Benalder Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, USA
Abstract
Energy is the most abundant and valuable natural resource of Central Asia and northwest China1 and includes oil, gas, coal, electricity, and renewables. Kazakhstan has large reserves of oil and coal. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have significant reserves of gas. Kyrgyzstan produces significant amounts of hydroelectric power. Xinjiang, China has significant coal resources and an uncertain, although generally promising, potential for oil in the Tarim basin. These energy reserves form the basis for future economic growth and development in the region, and energy exports are beginning to generate important foreign exchange revenues. Although Central Asia enjoys vast energy development potential, there are obstacles to exploiting these resources, including limited infrastructure for transporting energy—notably oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines—in the region, political turmoil, payment difficulties, and inadequate energy policies. Despite these challenges, however, with appropriate government planning Central Asia is poised to become a significant world supplier of energy, especially in the oil and gas sectors, and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.