- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 9, 2007 at 9:11 PM #11148December 9, 2007 at 10:23 PM #112660patientrenterParticipant
jyurasek, put yourself in the shoes of many of the participants who are in this up to their necks.
If you’re head of a bank or hedge fund with a lot of exposure, you’re out of a job for certain if home prices drop a lot now. This plan may get you 5 more years. That’s better than 5 more months. And at the end of the 5 years, who knows, maybe your losses won’t be so bad, or maybe not. At least you get 5 more years, and a second bite at the apple at the end.
Yes, total ultimate losses may be deeper by waiting 5 more years, but each individual participant facing ruin now doesn’t care about that. From an individual perspective, nothing is worse than an immediate 100% loss. If a bank’s losses are terrible 5 years from now, the CEO won’t be worse off than if he’s fired today.
If efforts to boost home prices fail, then the Fed and other govt institutions will try everything in their considerable power to inflate while keeping (at least some key) interest rates low.
Patient renter in OC
December 9, 2007 at 10:23 PM #112777patientrenterParticipantjyurasek, put yourself in the shoes of many of the participants who are in this up to their necks.
If you’re head of a bank or hedge fund with a lot of exposure, you’re out of a job for certain if home prices drop a lot now. This plan may get you 5 more years. That’s better than 5 more months. And at the end of the 5 years, who knows, maybe your losses won’t be so bad, or maybe not. At least you get 5 more years, and a second bite at the apple at the end.
Yes, total ultimate losses may be deeper by waiting 5 more years, but each individual participant facing ruin now doesn’t care about that. From an individual perspective, nothing is worse than an immediate 100% loss. If a bank’s losses are terrible 5 years from now, the CEO won’t be worse off than if he’s fired today.
If efforts to boost home prices fail, then the Fed and other govt institutions will try everything in their considerable power to inflate while keeping (at least some key) interest rates low.
Patient renter in OC
December 9, 2007 at 10:23 PM #112816patientrenterParticipantjyurasek, put yourself in the shoes of many of the participants who are in this up to their necks.
If you’re head of a bank or hedge fund with a lot of exposure, you’re out of a job for certain if home prices drop a lot now. This plan may get you 5 more years. That’s better than 5 more months. And at the end of the 5 years, who knows, maybe your losses won’t be so bad, or maybe not. At least you get 5 more years, and a second bite at the apple at the end.
Yes, total ultimate losses may be deeper by waiting 5 more years, but each individual participant facing ruin now doesn’t care about that. From an individual perspective, nothing is worse than an immediate 100% loss. If a bank’s losses are terrible 5 years from now, the CEO won’t be worse off than if he’s fired today.
If efforts to boost home prices fail, then the Fed and other govt institutions will try everything in their considerable power to inflate while keeping (at least some key) interest rates low.
Patient renter in OC
December 9, 2007 at 10:23 PM #112824patientrenterParticipantjyurasek, put yourself in the shoes of many of the participants who are in this up to their necks.
If you’re head of a bank or hedge fund with a lot of exposure, you’re out of a job for certain if home prices drop a lot now. This plan may get you 5 more years. That’s better than 5 more months. And at the end of the 5 years, who knows, maybe your losses won’t be so bad, or maybe not. At least you get 5 more years, and a second bite at the apple at the end.
Yes, total ultimate losses may be deeper by waiting 5 more years, but each individual participant facing ruin now doesn’t care about that. From an individual perspective, nothing is worse than an immediate 100% loss. If a bank’s losses are terrible 5 years from now, the CEO won’t be worse off than if he’s fired today.
If efforts to boost home prices fail, then the Fed and other govt institutions will try everything in their considerable power to inflate while keeping (at least some key) interest rates low.
Patient renter in OC
December 9, 2007 at 10:23 PM #112858patientrenterParticipantjyurasek, put yourself in the shoes of many of the participants who are in this up to their necks.
If you’re head of a bank or hedge fund with a lot of exposure, you’re out of a job for certain if home prices drop a lot now. This plan may get you 5 more years. That’s better than 5 more months. And at the end of the 5 years, who knows, maybe your losses won’t be so bad, or maybe not. At least you get 5 more years, and a second bite at the apple at the end.
Yes, total ultimate losses may be deeper by waiting 5 more years, but each individual participant facing ruin now doesn’t care about that. From an individual perspective, nothing is worse than an immediate 100% loss. If a bank’s losses are terrible 5 years from now, the CEO won’t be worse off than if he’s fired today.
If efforts to boost home prices fail, then the Fed and other govt institutions will try everything in their considerable power to inflate while keeping (at least some key) interest rates low.
Patient renter in OC
December 10, 2007 at 7:30 AM #112770crParticipant…if you qualify for the bailout in the first place that is.
Then you’d have to be able to afford your house, (maintenance/repairs, taxes, insurance, HOA, mello roos, and of course payment) AND you’re keep your job through the 5 year period, when it ends, you still have to be able to pay for the payment that will inevitably rise. By this time you house may have depreciated by another, 25-50% maybe?
Of course you can’t sell and cover the value of your loan during this further prolonged period of price declines, so you’re now stuck, 10 years? 15 years? Until you can sell and at least break even.
That’s is of course assuming your job will not be negatively affected by the hit on the economy from this correction.
But I’m sure ol’ Helicopter Boy will keep flushing the toilet on the dollar to get through this.
December 10, 2007 at 7:30 AM #112887crParticipant…if you qualify for the bailout in the first place that is.
Then you’d have to be able to afford your house, (maintenance/repairs, taxes, insurance, HOA, mello roos, and of course payment) AND you’re keep your job through the 5 year period, when it ends, you still have to be able to pay for the payment that will inevitably rise. By this time you house may have depreciated by another, 25-50% maybe?
Of course you can’t sell and cover the value of your loan during this further prolonged period of price declines, so you’re now stuck, 10 years? 15 years? Until you can sell and at least break even.
That’s is of course assuming your job will not be negatively affected by the hit on the economy from this correction.
But I’m sure ol’ Helicopter Boy will keep flushing the toilet on the dollar to get through this.
December 10, 2007 at 7:30 AM #112968crParticipant…if you qualify for the bailout in the first place that is.
Then you’d have to be able to afford your house, (maintenance/repairs, taxes, insurance, HOA, mello roos, and of course payment) AND you’re keep your job through the 5 year period, when it ends, you still have to be able to pay for the payment that will inevitably rise. By this time you house may have depreciated by another, 25-50% maybe?
Of course you can’t sell and cover the value of your loan during this further prolonged period of price declines, so you’re now stuck, 10 years? 15 years? Until you can sell and at least break even.
That’s is of course assuming your job will not be negatively affected by the hit on the economy from this correction.
But I’m sure ol’ Helicopter Boy will keep flushing the toilet on the dollar to get through this.
December 10, 2007 at 7:30 AM #112927crParticipant…if you qualify for the bailout in the first place that is.
Then you’d have to be able to afford your house, (maintenance/repairs, taxes, insurance, HOA, mello roos, and of course payment) AND you’re keep your job through the 5 year period, when it ends, you still have to be able to pay for the payment that will inevitably rise. By this time you house may have depreciated by another, 25-50% maybe?
Of course you can’t sell and cover the value of your loan during this further prolonged period of price declines, so you’re now stuck, 10 years? 15 years? Until you can sell and at least break even.
That’s is of course assuming your job will not be negatively affected by the hit on the economy from this correction.
But I’m sure ol’ Helicopter Boy will keep flushing the toilet on the dollar to get through this.
December 10, 2007 at 7:30 AM #112935crParticipant…if you qualify for the bailout in the first place that is.
Then you’d have to be able to afford your house, (maintenance/repairs, taxes, insurance, HOA, mello roos, and of course payment) AND you’re keep your job through the 5 year period, when it ends, you still have to be able to pay for the payment that will inevitably rise. By this time you house may have depreciated by another, 25-50% maybe?
Of course you can’t sell and cover the value of your loan during this further prolonged period of price declines, so you’re now stuck, 10 years? 15 years? Until you can sell and at least break even.
That’s is of course assuming your job will not be negatively affected by the hit on the economy from this correction.
But I’m sure ol’ Helicopter Boy will keep flushing the toilet on the dollar to get through this.
December 10, 2007 at 7:35 AM #112973ArrayaParticipantThe people making the plan don’t care. They will be long gone in 5 years. In the mean time it makes a select few suckers debt slaves to a bad investment just long enough for the investors to minimize their liabilities in the short term and get out of town.
December 10, 2007 at 7:35 AM #112940ArrayaParticipantThe people making the plan don’t care. They will be long gone in 5 years. In the mean time it makes a select few suckers debt slaves to a bad investment just long enough for the investors to minimize their liabilities in the short term and get out of town.
December 10, 2007 at 7:35 AM #112892ArrayaParticipantThe people making the plan don’t care. They will be long gone in 5 years. In the mean time it makes a select few suckers debt slaves to a bad investment just long enough for the investors to minimize their liabilities in the short term and get out of town.
December 10, 2007 at 7:35 AM #112775ArrayaParticipantThe people making the plan don’t care. They will be long gone in 5 years. In the mean time it makes a select few suckers debt slaves to a bad investment just long enough for the investors to minimize their liabilities in the short term and get out of town.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.